脉冲逐脉冲治疗计划及其在光子和质子超高剂量率放射治疗的一般观察中的应用。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
James L Bedford
{"title":"脉冲逐脉冲治疗计划及其在光子和质子超高剂量率放射治疗的一般观察中的应用。","authors":"James L Bedford","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adaf04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The exact temporal characteristics of beam delivery affect the efficacy and outcome of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR or 'FLASH') radiotherapy, mainly due to the influence of the beam pulse structure on mean dose rate. Single beams may also be delivered in separate treatment sessions to elevate mean dose rate. This paper therefore describes a model for pulse-by-pulse treatment planning and demonstrates its application by making some generic observations of the characteristics of FLASH radiotherapy with photons and protons.<i>Approach.</i>A beam delivery model was implemented into the AutoBeam (v6.3) inverse treatment planning system, so that the individual pulses of the delivery system could be explicitly described during optimisation. The delivery model was used to calculate distributions of time-averaged and dose-averaged mean dose rate and the dose modifying factor for FLASH was then determined and applied to dose calculated by a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver. The method was applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy with photons as well as to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning with protons for the case of a simple phantom geometry with a prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 3 fractions.<i>Main results.</i>Dose and dose rate are highest in the target region, so FLASH sparing is most pronounced around the planning target volume (PTV). When using a treatment session per beam, OAR sparing is possible more peripherally. The sparing with photons is higher than with protons because the dose to OAR is higher with photons.<i>Significance.</i>The framework provides an efficient method to determine the optimal technique for delivering clinical dose distributions using FLASH. The most sparing occurs close to the PTV for hypofractionated treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulse-by-pulse treatment planning and its application to generic observations of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy with photons and protons.\",\"authors\":\"James L Bedford\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adaf04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The exact temporal characteristics of beam delivery affect the efficacy and outcome of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR or 'FLASH') radiotherapy, mainly due to the influence of the beam pulse structure on mean dose rate. Single beams may also be delivered in separate treatment sessions to elevate mean dose rate. This paper therefore describes a model for pulse-by-pulse treatment planning and demonstrates its application by making some generic observations of the characteristics of FLASH radiotherapy with photons and protons.<i>Approach.</i>A beam delivery model was implemented into the AutoBeam (v6.3) inverse treatment planning system, so that the individual pulses of the delivery system could be explicitly described during optimisation. The delivery model was used to calculate distributions of time-averaged and dose-averaged mean dose rate and the dose modifying factor for FLASH was then determined and applied to dose calculated by a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver. The method was applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy with photons as well as to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning with protons for the case of a simple phantom geometry with a prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 3 fractions.<i>Main results.</i>Dose and dose rate are highest in the target region, so FLASH sparing is most pronounced around the planning target volume (PTV). When using a treatment session per beam, OAR sparing is possible more peripherally. The sparing with photons is higher than with protons because the dose to OAR is higher with photons.<i>Significance.</i>The framework provides an efficient method to determine the optimal technique for delivering clinical dose distributions using FLASH. The most sparing occurs close to the PTV for hypofractionated treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adaf04\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adaf04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:光束传递的确切时间特征影响超高剂量率(UHDR或“FLASH”)放疗的疗效和结果,主要是由于光束脉冲结构对平均剂量率的影响。为了提高平均剂量率,单束也可以在不同的治疗阶段进行。因此,本文描述了一个逐脉冲治疗计划的模型,并通过对光子和质子的FLASH放疗特性的一些一般观察来演示其应用。在AutoBeam (v6.3)逆处理计划系统中实现了光束输送模型,以便在优化过程中明确描述输送系统的各个脉冲。利用传递模型计算时间平均和剂量平均平均剂量率的分布,确定FLASH的剂量修正因子,并将其应用于离散坐标玻尔兹曼解算器计算的剂量。该方法应用于光子调强放射治疗(IMRT),以及质子被动散射和铅笔束扫描的情况下,一个简单的幻影几何,规定剂量为36 Gy,分3部分。剂量和剂量率在目标区域最高,因此在计划目标体积周围最明显。当每个波束进行一次治疗时,可以在更外围的地方保留桨叶。光子的节约比质子的节约要高,因为光子对OAR的剂量更高。该框架提供了一种有效的方法来确定使用FLASH提供临床剂量分布的最佳技术。对于低分割治疗,PTV附近最节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulse-by-pulse treatment planning and its application to generic observations of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy with photons and protons.

Objective.The exact temporal characteristics of beam delivery affect the efficacy and outcome of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR or 'FLASH') radiotherapy, mainly due to the influence of the beam pulse structure on mean dose rate. Single beams may also be delivered in separate treatment sessions to elevate mean dose rate. This paper therefore describes a model for pulse-by-pulse treatment planning and demonstrates its application by making some generic observations of the characteristics of FLASH radiotherapy with photons and protons.Approach.A beam delivery model was implemented into the AutoBeam (v6.3) inverse treatment planning system, so that the individual pulses of the delivery system could be explicitly described during optimisation. The delivery model was used to calculate distributions of time-averaged and dose-averaged mean dose rate and the dose modifying factor for FLASH was then determined and applied to dose calculated by a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver. The method was applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy with photons as well as to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning with protons for the case of a simple phantom geometry with a prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 3 fractions.Main results.Dose and dose rate are highest in the target region, so FLASH sparing is most pronounced around the planning target volume (PTV). When using a treatment session per beam, OAR sparing is possible more peripherally. The sparing with photons is higher than with protons because the dose to OAR is higher with photons.Significance.The framework provides an efficient method to determine the optimal technique for delivering clinical dose distributions using FLASH. The most sparing occurs close to the PTV for hypofractionated treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信