视频胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸手术治疗早期肺癌的长期生存率随机对照试验

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Finn Amundsen Dittberner, Morten Bendixen, Peter Bjørn Licht
{"title":"视频胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸手术治疗早期肺癌的长期生存率随机对照试验","authors":"Finn Amundsen Dittberner, Morten Bendixen, Peter Bjørn Licht","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously did a randomized clinical trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer and found that patients who underwent VATS had less postoperative pain and better quality of life compared with thoracotomy. VATS has since been regarded the preferred surgical method for early-stage lung cancer. It is assumed that long-term survival is not influenced by surgical approach, but this assumption primarily rests on non-randomized comparative studies. We decided to do a long-term follow-up of patients who entered our previous randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2008 and 2014, we randomly assigned 206 patients to VATS (n = 103) or anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 103) for proven or suspected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Records from patients with NSCLC on final pathology were identified in the national electronic patient-record system and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Overall, disease-free and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare the 2 interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients had NSCLC on final histopathology. Four patients were lost to follow-up and the remaining 192 were included in this follow-up study with 128 events used for overall survival analysis, 100 events for disease-free survival analysis and 79 events for CSS analysis. VATS was used in 99 patients versus 93 by thoracotomy. Median age at time of surgery was 66 years (range 41-85 years). After a median follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 9.9-15.8 years), 33% of patients were alive. Overall, disease-free and CSS were not significantly different between VATS and thoracotomy: overall survival (P = 0.29), disease-free survival (P = 0.17) and CSS (P = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall, disease-free or CSS between VATS and thoracotomy. However, larger trials with better power for survival analysis are needed to fully explore if there are differences. Alternatively, differences in survival between thoracotomy and VATS for early-stage NSCLC could be investigated by pooling survival data from 2 similar randomized trials that have since been published.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Finn Amundsen Dittberner, Morten Bendixen, Peter Bjørn Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously did a randomized clinical trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer and found that patients who underwent VATS had less postoperative pain and better quality of life compared with thoracotomy. VATS has since been regarded the preferred surgical method for early-stage lung cancer. It is assumed that long-term survival is not influenced by surgical approach, but this assumption primarily rests on non-randomized comparative studies. We decided to do a long-term follow-up of patients who entered our previous randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2008 and 2014, we randomly assigned 206 patients to VATS (n = 103) or anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 103) for proven or suspected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Records from patients with NSCLC on final pathology were identified in the national electronic patient-record system and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Overall, disease-free and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare the 2 interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients had NSCLC on final histopathology. Four patients were lost to follow-up and the remaining 192 were included in this follow-up study with 128 events used for overall survival analysis, 100 events for disease-free survival analysis and 79 events for CSS analysis. VATS was used in 99 patients versus 93 by thoracotomy. Median age at time of surgery was 66 years (range 41-85 years). After a median follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 9.9-15.8 years), 33% of patients were alive. Overall, disease-free and CSS were not significantly different between VATS and thoracotomy: overall survival (P = 0.29), disease-free survival (P = 0.17) and CSS (P = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall, disease-free or CSS between VATS and thoracotomy. However, larger trials with better power for survival analysis are needed to fully explore if there are differences. Alternatively, differences in survival between thoracotomy and VATS for early-stage NSCLC could be investigated by pooling survival data from 2 similar randomized trials that have since been published.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们之前进行了一项早期肺癌肺叶切除术VATS或开胸的随机临床试验,发现与开胸相比,接受VATS的患者术后疼痛更少,生活质量更好。VATS一直被认为是早期肺癌的首选手术方法。假设长期生存不受手术入路的影响,但这一假设主要基于非随机比较研究。我们决定对之前随机试验的患者进行长期随访。方法:在2008年至2014年期间,我们随机分配206例确诊或疑似早期NSCLC患者进行VATS (n = 103)或前外侧开胸术(n = 103)。非小细胞肺癌患者的最终病理记录在国家电子病历系统和丹麦肺癌登记处得到确认。总体而言,使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计无病和癌症特异性生存,并使用log-rank检验比较两种干预措施。结果:196例患者经最终组织病理学检查为非小细胞肺癌。4例患者失去随访,其余192例纳入本随访研究,其中128例用于总体生存分析,100例用于无病生存分析,79例用于癌症特异性生存分析。99例患者采用VATS, 93例患者采用开胸术。手术时的中位年龄为66岁(范围41-85岁)。中位随访时间为12.8年(范围9.9-15.8年),33%的患者存活。VATS和开胸术的总生存率、无病生存率和癌症特异性生存率无显著差异:总生存率(p = 0.29)、无病生存率(p = 0.17)和癌症特异性生存率(p = 0.31)。结论:我们没有发现VATS和开胸术在总体、无病或癌症特异性生存方面有统计学上的显著差异。然而,需要更大规模的生存分析试验来充分探索是否存在差异。另外,可以通过汇集两项已发表的类似随机试验的生存数据来研究开胸和VATS治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的生存差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer.

Objectives: We previously did a randomized clinical trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer and found that patients who underwent VATS had less postoperative pain and better quality of life compared with thoracotomy. VATS has since been regarded the preferred surgical method for early-stage lung cancer. It is assumed that long-term survival is not influenced by surgical approach, but this assumption primarily rests on non-randomized comparative studies. We decided to do a long-term follow-up of patients who entered our previous randomized trial.

Methods: Between 2008 and 2014, we randomly assigned 206 patients to VATS (n = 103) or anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 103) for proven or suspected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Records from patients with NSCLC on final pathology were identified in the national electronic patient-record system and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Overall, disease-free and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare the 2 interventions.

Results: A total of 196 patients had NSCLC on final histopathology. Four patients were lost to follow-up and the remaining 192 were included in this follow-up study with 128 events used for overall survival analysis, 100 events for disease-free survival analysis and 79 events for CSS analysis. VATS was used in 99 patients versus 93 by thoracotomy. Median age at time of surgery was 66 years (range 41-85 years). After a median follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 9.9-15.8 years), 33% of patients were alive. Overall, disease-free and CSS were not significantly different between VATS and thoracotomy: overall survival (P = 0.29), disease-free survival (P = 0.17) and CSS (P = 0.31).

Conclusions: We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall, disease-free or CSS between VATS and thoracotomy. However, larger trials with better power for survival analysis are needed to fully explore if there are differences. Alternatively, differences in survival between thoracotomy and VATS for early-stage NSCLC could be investigated by pooling survival data from 2 similar randomized trials that have since been published.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信