Charlotte Fisch, Malou E Gelderblom, Rosella P M G Hermens, Philip R de Reuver, Simon W Nienhuijs, Diederik M Somford, Joanne A de Hullu, Jurgen M J Piek
{"title":"非妇科手术期间输卵管切除术降低卵巢癌风险:范围审查。","authors":"Charlotte Fisch, Malou E Gelderblom, Rosella P M G Hermens, Philip R de Reuver, Simon W Nienhuijs, Diederik M Somford, Joanne A de Hullu, Jurgen M J Piek","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynaecological cancers. The identification of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of most ovarian cancers introduces a novel prevention strategy by removing the fallopian tubes during an already indicated abdominal surgery for another reason, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. This preventive opportunity is evidence based, recommended and established at the time of gynaecologic surgery in many countries worldwide. To expand interest among surgeons in performing a salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery, the aim of this review is to identify knowledge gaps during those surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed following the PRISMA-Scoping Review (ScR) checklist. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024. Trial registers were searched for ongoing trials. All studies reporting original data on salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery were included. Outcomes were provided narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were identified reporting on the implementation, surgical feasibility, patients' perspectives, physicians' knowledge and cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery. Population-level data indicate that an opportunistic salpingectomy is rarely performed in non-gynaecological surgeries. High success rates and no complications of an opportunistic salpingectomy were observed during bariatric surgery and cholecystectomies. However, performing an additional salpingectomy appeared more time-consuming. Patients had strong interest in information on and willingness to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Cost-effectiveness analysis encourages opportunistic salpingectomy use, as models show reduced ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rate while being cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecologic surgery appears to be a promising method to prevent ovarian cancer. Implementing such a strategy will require education of multiple surgical disciplines, training and resolution of organizational issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ovarian cancer risk reduction by salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery: scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Fisch, Malou E Gelderblom, Rosella P M G Hermens, Philip R de Reuver, Simon W Nienhuijs, Diederik M Somford, Joanne A de Hullu, Jurgen M J Piek\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynaecological cancers. The identification of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of most ovarian cancers introduces a novel prevention strategy by removing the fallopian tubes during an already indicated abdominal surgery for another reason, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. This preventive opportunity is evidence based, recommended and established at the time of gynaecologic surgery in many countries worldwide. To expand interest among surgeons in performing a salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery, the aim of this review is to identify knowledge gaps during those surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed following the PRISMA-Scoping Review (ScR) checklist. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024. Trial registers were searched for ongoing trials. All studies reporting original data on salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery were included. Outcomes were provided narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were identified reporting on the implementation, surgical feasibility, patients' perspectives, physicians' knowledge and cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery. Population-level data indicate that an opportunistic salpingectomy is rarely performed in non-gynaecological surgeries. High success rates and no complications of an opportunistic salpingectomy were observed during bariatric surgery and cholecystectomies. However, performing an additional salpingectomy appeared more time-consuming. Patients had strong interest in information on and willingness to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Cost-effectiveness analysis encourages opportunistic salpingectomy use, as models show reduced ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rate while being cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecologic surgery appears to be a promising method to prevent ovarian cancer. Implementing such a strategy will require education of multiple surgical disciplines, training and resolution of organizational issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:卵巢癌是妇科癌症中导致死亡的主要原因。输卵管上皮是大多数卵巢癌的起源,这引入了一种新的预防策略,即在已经指示的腹部手术中切除输卵管,因为另一个原因,也称为机会性输卵管切除术。这种预防机会是基于证据的,是世界上许多国家在妇科手术时推荐和确立的。为了扩大外科医生在非妇科手术中进行输卵管切除术的兴趣,本综述的目的是确定这些手术中的知识差距。方法:根据prisma - scope review (ScR)检查表进行范围审查。系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)数据库和Cochrane图书馆自成立至2024年11月。检索正在进行的试验登记。所有报告非妇科手术期间输卵管切除术原始数据的研究均被纳入。结果以叙述方式提供。结果:18项研究报告了机会性输卵管切除术在非妇科手术中的实施、手术可行性、患者观点、医生知识和成本效益。人口水平的数据表明,机会性输卵管切除术很少在非妇科手术中进行。在减肥手术和胆囊切除术中观察到机会性输卵管切除术的高成功率和无并发症。然而,进行额外的输卵管切除术似乎更耗时。患者对机会性输卵管切除术的信息有强烈的兴趣和意愿。成本效益分析鼓励机会性使用输卵管切除术,因为模型显示卵巢癌发病率和死亡率降低,同时具有成本效益。结论:机会性输卵管切除术在非妇科手术期间似乎是一种很有希望的预防卵巢癌的方法。实施这样的策略将需要多种外科学科的教育,培训和解决组织问题。
Ovarian cancer risk reduction by salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery: scoping review.
Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynaecological cancers. The identification of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of most ovarian cancers introduces a novel prevention strategy by removing the fallopian tubes during an already indicated abdominal surgery for another reason, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. This preventive opportunity is evidence based, recommended and established at the time of gynaecologic surgery in many countries worldwide. To expand interest among surgeons in performing a salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery, the aim of this review is to identify knowledge gaps during those surgeries.
Methods: A scoping review was performed following the PRISMA-Scoping Review (ScR) checklist. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024. Trial registers were searched for ongoing trials. All studies reporting original data on salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery were included. Outcomes were provided narratively.
Results: Eighteen studies were identified reporting on the implementation, surgical feasibility, patients' perspectives, physicians' knowledge and cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery. Population-level data indicate that an opportunistic salpingectomy is rarely performed in non-gynaecological surgeries. High success rates and no complications of an opportunistic salpingectomy were observed during bariatric surgery and cholecystectomies. However, performing an additional salpingectomy appeared more time-consuming. Patients had strong interest in information on and willingness to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Cost-effectiveness analysis encourages opportunistic salpingectomy use, as models show reduced ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rate while being cost-effective.
Conclusions: Opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecologic surgery appears to be a promising method to prevent ovarian cancer. Implementing such a strategy will require education of multiple surgical disciplines, training and resolution of organizational issues.