糖尿病患者减肥手术后的健康支出:胃旁路和袖式胃切除术的比较。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-00480
Matthew L Maciejewski, Lindsay Zepel, Valerie A Smith, David E Arterburn, Mary K Theis, Aileen Baecker, Caroline Sloan, Amy G Clark, Ryan M Kane, Christopher R Daigle, Karen J Coleman, Aniket A Kawatkar
{"title":"糖尿病患者减肥手术后的健康支出:胃旁路和袖式胃切除术的比较。","authors":"Matthew L Maciejewski, Lindsay Zepel, Valerie A Smith, David E Arterburn, Mary K Theis, Aileen Baecker, Caroline Sloan, Amy G Clark, Ryan M Kane, Christopher R Daigle, Karen J Coleman, Aniket A Kawatkar","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) differ in their effects on body weight and risk for reoperation. However, it is unclear whether long-term health expenditures differ by procedure type in patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare health expenditures 3 years before and 5.5 years after bariatric surgery between patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB versus SG.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using target trial emulation principles.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Integrated health system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB (<i>n</i> = 3147) or SG (<i>n</i> = 3510) from 2012 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Total, inpatient, outpatient, and medication expenditures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics of patients undergoing RYGB and SG were well balanced after weighting; 73% were female, average body mass index was 43.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and average age was 50 years. Expenditures per 6-month period decreased by about 30% for both groups, from $4039.06 (95% CI, $3770.88 to $4326.31) 3 years before to $2441.13 (CI, $2151.07 to $2770.30) 5.5 years after RYGB and from $3918.37 (CI, $3658.75 to $4196.40) 3 years before to $2658.15 (CI, $2279.17 to $3100.16) 5.5 years after SG. Total expenditures after surgery did not differ between groups through 5.5 years (difference at 5.5 years, -$217.02 [CI, -$671.29 to $201.96]) except for the first 6 months, when expenditures were transiently higher in the RYGB group (difference, $564.32 [CI, $232.60 to $895.20]), driven by a higher inpatient admission rate. Otherwise, postsurgical outpatient and medication expenditures did not appear to differ between RYGB and SG.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Unobserved confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall expenditures decreased substantially in the postsurgical period, primarily due to reductions in pharmacy expenditures, with no differences between RYGB and SG except in the first 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Expenditures of Patients With Diabetes After Bariatric Surgery: Comparing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew L Maciejewski, Lindsay Zepel, Valerie A Smith, David E Arterburn, Mary K Theis, Aileen Baecker, Caroline Sloan, Amy G Clark, Ryan M Kane, Christopher R Daigle, Karen J Coleman, Aniket A Kawatkar\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) differ in their effects on body weight and risk for reoperation. However, it is unclear whether long-term health expenditures differ by procedure type in patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare health expenditures 3 years before and 5.5 years after bariatric surgery between patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB versus SG.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using target trial emulation principles.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Integrated health system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB (<i>n</i> = 3147) or SG (<i>n</i> = 3510) from 2012 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Total, inpatient, outpatient, and medication expenditures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics of patients undergoing RYGB and SG were well balanced after weighting; 73% were female, average body mass index was 43.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and average age was 50 years. Expenditures per 6-month period decreased by about 30% for both groups, from $4039.06 (95% CI, $3770.88 to $4326.31) 3 years before to $2441.13 (CI, $2151.07 to $2770.30) 5.5 years after RYGB and from $3918.37 (CI, $3658.75 to $4196.40) 3 years before to $2658.15 (CI, $2279.17 to $3100.16) 5.5 years after SG. Total expenditures after surgery did not differ between groups through 5.5 years (difference at 5.5 years, -$217.02 [CI, -$671.29 to $201.96]) except for the first 6 months, when expenditures were transiently higher in the RYGB group (difference, $564.32 [CI, $232.60 to $895.20]), driven by a higher inpatient admission rate. Otherwise, postsurgical outpatient and medication expenditures did not appear to differ between RYGB and SG.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Unobserved confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall expenditures decreased substantially in the postsurgical period, primarily due to reductions in pharmacy expenditures, with no differences between RYGB and SG except in the first 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"305-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00480\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖式胃切除术(SG)对体重和再手术风险的影响不同。然而,目前尚不清楚糖尿病患者的长期医疗支出是否因手术类型而异。目的:比较接受RYGB和SG的糖尿病患者减肥手术前3年和手术后5.5年的医疗支出。设计:采用目标试验模拟原则的回顾性队列研究。环境:综合卫生系统。患者:2012 - 2019年接受RYGB (n = 3147)或SG (n = 3510)治疗的糖尿病患者。测量:总住院、门诊和药物支出。结果:经加权后,RYGB和SG患者的特征平衡良好;女性占73%,平均体重指数43.8 kg/m2,平均年龄50岁。两组每6个月的支出都减少了约30%,从3年前的4039.06美元(95% CI, 3770.88美元至4326.31美元)下降到RYGB后5.5年的2441.13美元(CI, 2151.07美元至2770.30美元),从3年前的3918.37美元(CI, 3658.75美元至4196.40美元)下降到SG后5.5年的2658.15美元(CI, 2279.17美元至3100.16美元)。手术后的总费用在5.5年内各组之间没有差异(5.5年的差异,- 217.02美元[CI, - 671.29美元至201.96美元]),除了前6个月,RYGB组的费用暂时较高(差异,564.32美元[CI, 232.60美元至895.20美元]),这是由较高的住院率引起的。此外,术后门诊和药物支出在RYGB和SG之间似乎没有差异。限制:未观察到的混淆。结论:总体费用在术后大幅下降,主要是由于药房费用的减少,RYGB和SG之间除了术后前6个月没有差异。主要资金来源:国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Expenditures of Patients With Diabetes After Bariatric Surgery: Comparing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) differ in their effects on body weight and risk for reoperation. However, it is unclear whether long-term health expenditures differ by procedure type in patients with diabetes.

Objective: To compare health expenditures 3 years before and 5.5 years after bariatric surgery between patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB versus SG.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using target trial emulation principles.

Setting: Integrated health system.

Patients: Patients with diabetes undergoing RYGB (n = 3147) or SG (n = 3510) from 2012 to 2019.

Measurements: Total, inpatient, outpatient, and medication expenditures.

Results: Characteristics of patients undergoing RYGB and SG were well balanced after weighting; 73% were female, average body mass index was 43.8 kg/m2, and average age was 50 years. Expenditures per 6-month period decreased by about 30% for both groups, from $4039.06 (95% CI, $3770.88 to $4326.31) 3 years before to $2441.13 (CI, $2151.07 to $2770.30) 5.5 years after RYGB and from $3918.37 (CI, $3658.75 to $4196.40) 3 years before to $2658.15 (CI, $2279.17 to $3100.16) 5.5 years after SG. Total expenditures after surgery did not differ between groups through 5.5 years (difference at 5.5 years, -$217.02 [CI, -$671.29 to $201.96]) except for the first 6 months, when expenditures were transiently higher in the RYGB group (difference, $564.32 [CI, $232.60 to $895.20]), driven by a higher inpatient admission rate. Otherwise, postsurgical outpatient and medication expenditures did not appear to differ between RYGB and SG.

Limitation: Unobserved confounding.

Conclusion: Overall expenditures decreased substantially in the postsurgical period, primarily due to reductions in pharmacy expenditures, with no differences between RYGB and SG except in the first 6 months after surgery.

Primary funding source: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信