Gündüzalp Buğrahan Babacan, Filiz Özülker, Oğuzhan Şahin, Osman Güven, Osman Kanatsız, Göksel Alçın, Tamer Özülker
{"title":"数字PET/CT时代是否有新的18F-FDG生物分布?真实世界的数据分析。","authors":"Gündüzalp Buğrahan Babacan, Filiz Özülker, Oğuzhan Şahin, Osman Güven, Osman Kanatsız, Göksel Alçın, Tamer Özülker","doi":"10.1089/cbr.2024.0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This retrospective multicenter study investigated the biodistribution of Fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) in the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in digital PET/CT (dPET) compared to analog PET/CT (aPET), focusing differences in physiological uptake in reference and small structures across various scanner models. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> One hundred thirty patients with similar preimaging conditions underwent both dPET and aPET imaging within 6 months. Visual evaluations and paired comparative analyses of semiquantitative parameters were performed for small and reference structures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake was higher in both reference and small structures for dPET compared to three different aPET scanners. The Siemens mCT20-4R (mCT20) demonstrated comparable results to dPET. Notably, mCT20 had higher standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) for the conus medullaris (CM) (3.20 vs. 2.76). CM was most highly visible with dPET on visual evaluation by physicians. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Digital PET/CT provides higher SUV values in both small and reference structures. This leads to improved visualization of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG physiological biodistribution. Given the growing adoption of dPET technology, these advancements should be carefully considered in image interpretation and clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55277,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There Novel <sup>18</sup>F-FDG Biodistribution in the Digital PET/CT Era? A Real-World Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gündüzalp Buğrahan Babacan, Filiz Özülker, Oğuzhan Şahin, Osman Güven, Osman Kanatsız, Göksel Alçın, Tamer Özülker\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/cbr.2024.0226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This retrospective multicenter study investigated the biodistribution of Fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) in the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in digital PET/CT (dPET) compared to analog PET/CT (aPET), focusing differences in physiological uptake in reference and small structures across various scanner models. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> One hundred thirty patients with similar preimaging conditions underwent both dPET and aPET imaging within 6 months. Visual evaluations and paired comparative analyses of semiquantitative parameters were performed for small and reference structures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake was higher in both reference and small structures for dPET compared to three different aPET scanners. The Siemens mCT20-4R (mCT20) demonstrated comparable results to dPET. Notably, mCT20 had higher standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) for the conus medullaris (CM) (3.20 vs. 2.76). CM was most highly visible with dPET on visual evaluation by physicians. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Digital PET/CT provides higher SUV values in both small and reference structures. This leads to improved visualization of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG physiological biodistribution. Given the growing adoption of dPET technology, these advancements should be carefully considered in image interpretation and clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2024.0226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2024.0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:这项回顾性的多中心研究调查了氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)在正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)中的生物分布,数字PET/CT (dPET)与模拟PET/CT (aPET)相比,聚焦了不同扫描仪模型中参考和小结构的生理摄取差异。材料与方法:130例影像学前情况相似的患者在6个月内同时行dPET和aPET影像学检查。对小型结构和参考结构进行了视觉评价和半定量参数配对比较分析。结果:与三种不同的aPET扫描仪相比,dPET的参考结构和小结构中18F-FDG的摄取都更高。西门子mCT20- 4r (mCT20)显示出与dPET相当的结果。值得注意的是,mCT20对髓圆锥(CM)具有更高的标准化摄取值(SUVmax) (3.20 vs. 2.76)。在医生的视觉评价中,dPET显示CM最明显。结论:数字PET/CT在小型和参考结构中均具有较高的SUV值。这可以改善18F-FDG生理生物分布的可视化。鉴于dPET技术的日益普及,在图像解释和临床研究中应该仔细考虑这些进步。
Is There Novel 18F-FDG Biodistribution in the Digital PET/CT Era? A Real-World Data Analysis.
Background: This retrospective multicenter study investigated the biodistribution of Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in digital PET/CT (dPET) compared to analog PET/CT (aPET), focusing differences in physiological uptake in reference and small structures across various scanner models. Materials and Methods: One hundred thirty patients with similar preimaging conditions underwent both dPET and aPET imaging within 6 months. Visual evaluations and paired comparative analyses of semiquantitative parameters were performed for small and reference structures. Results:18F-FDG uptake was higher in both reference and small structures for dPET compared to three different aPET scanners. The Siemens mCT20-4R (mCT20) demonstrated comparable results to dPET. Notably, mCT20 had higher standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the conus medullaris (CM) (3.20 vs. 2.76). CM was most highly visible with dPET on visual evaluation by physicians. Conclusions: Digital PET/CT provides higher SUV values in both small and reference structures. This leads to improved visualization of 18F-FDG physiological biodistribution. Given the growing adoption of dPET technology, these advancements should be carefully considered in image interpretation and clinical research.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals is the established peer-reviewed journal, with over 25 years of cutting-edge content on innovative therapeutic investigations to ultimately improve cancer management. It is the only journal with the specific focus of cancer biotherapy and is inclusive of monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapy, cancer gene therapy, cell-based therapies, and other forms of immunotherapies.
The Journal includes extensive reporting on advancements in radioimmunotherapy, and the use of radiopharmaceuticals and radiolabeled peptides for the development of new cancer treatments.