Hanan Hamdan, Yen-Chun Liu, Sa A. Wang, Jacob Bledsoe, Karen M. Chisholm, Alexa Siddon, Robert Ohgami, Tracy I. George, Jason Kurzer, Robert P. Hasserjian, Daniel A. Arber, Adam Bagg, Kathryn Foucar, Elizabeth Margolskee, Dorottya Laczko, Weina Chen, Franklin Fuda, Nidhi Aggarwal, Olga K. Weinberg
{"title":"具有RAM免疫表型的急性髓系白血病的临床、免疫表型和基因组研究结果:与其他cd56阳性急性白血病的比较","authors":"Hanan Hamdan, Yen-Chun Liu, Sa A. Wang, Jacob Bledsoe, Karen M. Chisholm, Alexa Siddon, Robert Ohgami, Tracy I. George, Jason Kurzer, Robert P. Hasserjian, Daniel A. Arber, Adam Bagg, Kathryn Foucar, Elizabeth Margolskee, Dorottya Laczko, Weina Chen, Franklin Fuda, Nidhi Aggarwal, Olga K. Weinberg","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RAM immunophenotype is a newly recognized high-risk AML immunophenotypic subcategory characterized by blasts with bright expression of CD56 and weak to absent expression of CD45, HLA-DR, and CD38, as first described by the Children's Oncology Group (COG). The relationship between AML-RAM and other CD56-positive acute leukemias is unclear. The goal of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological characteristics of AML with RAM phenotype and compare them with other CD56 co-expressing acute leukemias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From a multi-institutional search, we identified a total of 160 CD56+ acute leukemia cases, including AML-RAM (<i>n</i> = 28), CD56+ acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) (<i>n</i> = 11), CD56+ T-lymphoblastic leukemia (<i>n</i> = 39), and CD56+ AML (<i>n</i> = 81). We compared the clinical and pathologic findings of these groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>AML-RAM patients were significantly younger and presented with significantly higher platelet and white blood cell counts and bone marrow (BM) blast percentages when compared to AUL (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and had higher median BM blast percentages than T-ALL and CD56+ AML groups (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). Flow cytometry showed significantly brighter expression of CD56 on blasts as compared to other CD56+ AML cases, partial CD34 expression compared to AUL, and AML, weak-to-absent CD38 expression compared to all groups, and absent HLA-DR and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as compared to AUL and T-ALL (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The frequency of abnormal karyotypes was significantly higher among RAM when compared to all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Next-generation sequencing profiles differed among the leukemia groups, with significant enrichment of <i>CBFA2T3::GLIS2</i> fusions (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and <i>TP53</i> mutations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in RAM cases compared to other AML control groups, and <i>U2AF1</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and BCL6 co-repressor (<i>p</i> < 0.05) mutations compared to AUL. Clinical outcome analysis demonstrated significantly lower 3-year overall survival of the RAM subgroup (36 months) compared to control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We find that AML with RAM phenotype occurs primarily in younger ages, with distinct clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and mutational presentations, and worse prognosis. This diagnosis should be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis of CD56-positive acute leukemias.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genomic findings of acute myeloid leukemia with RAM immunophenotype: Comparison with other CD56-positive acute leukemias\",\"authors\":\"Hanan Hamdan, Yen-Chun Liu, Sa A. Wang, Jacob Bledsoe, Karen M. Chisholm, Alexa Siddon, Robert Ohgami, Tracy I. George, Jason Kurzer, Robert P. Hasserjian, Daniel A. Arber, Adam Bagg, Kathryn Foucar, Elizabeth Margolskee, Dorottya Laczko, Weina Chen, Franklin Fuda, Nidhi Aggarwal, Olga K. Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jha2.1052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RAM immunophenotype is a newly recognized high-risk AML immunophenotypic subcategory characterized by blasts with bright expression of CD56 and weak to absent expression of CD45, HLA-DR, and CD38, as first described by the Children's Oncology Group (COG). The relationship between AML-RAM and other CD56-positive acute leukemias is unclear. The goal of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological characteristics of AML with RAM phenotype and compare them with other CD56 co-expressing acute leukemias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>From a multi-institutional search, we identified a total of 160 CD56+ acute leukemia cases, including AML-RAM (<i>n</i> = 28), CD56+ acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) (<i>n</i> = 11), CD56+ T-lymphoblastic leukemia (<i>n</i> = 39), and CD56+ AML (<i>n</i> = 81). We compared the clinical and pathologic findings of these groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>AML-RAM patients were significantly younger and presented with significantly higher platelet and white blood cell counts and bone marrow (BM) blast percentages when compared to AUL (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and had higher median BM blast percentages than T-ALL and CD56+ AML groups (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). Flow cytometry showed significantly brighter expression of CD56 on blasts as compared to other CD56+ AML cases, partial CD34 expression compared to AUL, and AML, weak-to-absent CD38 expression compared to all groups, and absent HLA-DR and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as compared to AUL and T-ALL (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The frequency of abnormal karyotypes was significantly higher among RAM when compared to all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Next-generation sequencing profiles differed among the leukemia groups, with significant enrichment of <i>CBFA2T3::GLIS2</i> fusions (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and <i>TP53</i> mutations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in RAM cases compared to other AML control groups, and <i>U2AF1</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and BCL6 co-repressor (<i>p</i> < 0.05) mutations compared to AUL. Clinical outcome analysis demonstrated significantly lower 3-year overall survival of the RAM subgroup (36 months) compared to control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We find that AML with RAM phenotype occurs primarily in younger ages, with distinct clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and mutational presentations, and worse prognosis. This diagnosis should be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis of CD56-positive acute leukemias.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJHaem\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJHaem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性髓性白血病(AML)具有RAM免疫表型,是一种新发现的高风险AML免疫表型亚类,其特征是CD56的亮表达和CD45、HLA-DR和CD38的弱表达或缺失,由儿童肿瘤小组(COG)首次描述。AML-RAM与其他cd56阳性急性白血病之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是表征具有RAM表型的AML的临床病理特征,并将其与其他共表达CD56的急性白血病进行比较。方法:通过多机构检索,我们确定了160例CD56+急性白血病病例,包括AML- ram (n = 28), CD56+急性未分化白血病(AUL) (n = 11), CD56+ t淋巴细胞白血病(n = 39)和CD56+ AML (n = 81)。我们比较了这两组的临床和病理表现。结果:AML- ram患者明显更年轻,血小板、白细胞计数和骨髓(BM)细胞百分比明显高于AUL (p < 0.05),骨髓(BM)细胞百分比中位数高于T-ALL和CD56+ AML组(p < p CBFA2T3::GLIS2融合(p < p TP53突变(p < p = 0.002))。结论:我们发现具有RAM表型的AML主要发生在较年轻的年龄,具有独特的临床病理,免疫表型和突变表现,预后较差。在cd56阳性急性白血病的临床鉴别诊断中应考虑这一诊断。
Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genomic findings of acute myeloid leukemia with RAM immunophenotype: Comparison with other CD56-positive acute leukemias
Background
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RAM immunophenotype is a newly recognized high-risk AML immunophenotypic subcategory characterized by blasts with bright expression of CD56 and weak to absent expression of CD45, HLA-DR, and CD38, as first described by the Children's Oncology Group (COG). The relationship between AML-RAM and other CD56-positive acute leukemias is unclear. The goal of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological characteristics of AML with RAM phenotype and compare them with other CD56 co-expressing acute leukemias.
Methods
From a multi-institutional search, we identified a total of 160 CD56+ acute leukemia cases, including AML-RAM (n = 28), CD56+ acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) (n = 11), CD56+ T-lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 39), and CD56+ AML (n = 81). We compared the clinical and pathologic findings of these groups.
Results
AML-RAM patients were significantly younger and presented with significantly higher platelet and white blood cell counts and bone marrow (BM) blast percentages when compared to AUL (p > 0.05) and had higher median BM blast percentages than T-ALL and CD56+ AML groups (both p < 0.05). Flow cytometry showed significantly brighter expression of CD56 on blasts as compared to other CD56+ AML cases, partial CD34 expression compared to AUL, and AML, weak-to-absent CD38 expression compared to all groups, and absent HLA-DR and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as compared to AUL and T-ALL (all p < 0.05). The frequency of abnormal karyotypes was significantly higher among RAM when compared to all groups (p < 0.05). Next-generation sequencing profiles differed among the leukemia groups, with significant enrichment of CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusions (p < 0.05) and TP53 mutations (p < 0.05) in RAM cases compared to other AML control groups, and U2AF1 (p < 0.05), serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 2 (p < 0.05), and BCL6 co-repressor (p < 0.05) mutations compared to AUL. Clinical outcome analysis demonstrated significantly lower 3-year overall survival of the RAM subgroup (36 months) compared to control groups (p = 0.002).
Conclusion
We find that AML with RAM phenotype occurs primarily in younger ages, with distinct clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and mutational presentations, and worse prognosis. This diagnosis should be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis of CD56-positive acute leukemias.