脓毒症患者乳酸与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值的预后价值比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S486966
Ralphe Bou Chebl, Saadeddine Haidar, Nadim Kattouf, Mohamad Assaf, Joudie Sahar Alwan, Mohamad M Khamis, Karim Abdeldaem, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim, Gilbert Abou Dagher
{"title":"脓毒症患者乳酸与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值的预后价值比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Ralphe Bou Chebl, Saadeddine Haidar, Nadim Kattouf, Mohamad Assaf, Joudie Sahar Alwan, Mohamad M Khamis, Karim Abdeldaem, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim, Gilbert Abou Dagher","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S486966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lactate has long been recognized as a key prognostic biomarker in sepsis. Similarly, the prognostic role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in various conditions, including sepsis. Previous studies have explored the optimal NLR cutoff to differentiate sepsis survivors from nonsurvivors, predict bacteremia, diagnose sepsis, and assess mortality. This study compares the prognostic value of lactate and NLR in septic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 874 adult septic or septic shock patients presenting to a tertiary care center's Emergency Department between September 2018 and February 2021. The primary outcome was to compare the prognostic value of NLR and lactate regarding in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes compared their prognostic value in different septic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stepwise logistic regression showed NLR was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.003, p=0.544), while lactate was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.188, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the AUCs of NLR and lactate (0.552 vs 0.591, p=0.22). Lactate outperformed NLR in patients with albumin <30, those <65 years old, and those with sepsis from a urinary tract infection. No significant differences were found in AUCs between lactate and NLR in patients with septic shock, Lactate<2, Lactate≥2, diabetes, malignancy, chronic kidney diseases, other sources of infection, albumin ≥30 and age ≥ 65.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, lactate but not NLR was associated with in-hospital mortality. There was no significant difference in the AUCs between lactate and NLR among sepsis patients and among most of the subgroups. However, lactate outperformed NLR in the following subgroups: albumin<30 g/L, patients <65 years old and patients with sepsis due to a urinary tract infection. Our results advocate for the continued use of serum lactate rather than NLR, despite its limitations, as a predictor of mortality among septic patients and the different subgroups in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Prognostic Value of Lactate to the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Among Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ralphe Bou Chebl, Saadeddine Haidar, Nadim Kattouf, Mohamad Assaf, Joudie Sahar Alwan, Mohamad M Khamis, Karim Abdeldaem, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim, Gilbert Abou Dagher\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S486966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lactate has long been recognized as a key prognostic biomarker in sepsis. Similarly, the prognostic role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in various conditions, including sepsis. Previous studies have explored the optimal NLR cutoff to differentiate sepsis survivors from nonsurvivors, predict bacteremia, diagnose sepsis, and assess mortality. This study compares the prognostic value of lactate and NLR in septic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 874 adult septic or septic shock patients presenting to a tertiary care center's Emergency Department between September 2018 and February 2021. The primary outcome was to compare the prognostic value of NLR and lactate regarding in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes compared their prognostic value in different septic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stepwise logistic regression showed NLR was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.003, p=0.544), while lactate was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.188, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the AUCs of NLR and lactate (0.552 vs 0.591, p=0.22). Lactate outperformed NLR in patients with albumin <30, those <65 years old, and those with sepsis from a urinary tract infection. No significant differences were found in AUCs between lactate and NLR in patients with septic shock, Lactate<2, Lactate≥2, diabetes, malignancy, chronic kidney diseases, other sources of infection, albumin ≥30 and age ≥ 65.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, lactate but not NLR was associated with in-hospital mortality. There was no significant difference in the AUCs between lactate and NLR among sepsis patients and among most of the subgroups. However, lactate outperformed NLR in the following subgroups: albumin<30 g/L, patients <65 years old and patients with sepsis due to a urinary tract infection. Our results advocate for the continued use of serum lactate rather than NLR, despite its limitations, as a predictor of mortality among septic patients and the different subgroups in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S486966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S486966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳酸一直被认为是脓毒症的关键预后生物标志物。同样,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)在各种情况下的预后作用也被研究过,包括败血症。先前的研究已经探索了最佳NLR截止值来区分脓毒症幸存者和非幸存者,预测菌血症,诊断脓毒症和评估死亡率。本研究比较乳酸和NLR在脓毒症患者中的预后价值。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2018年9月至2021年2月期间在三级保健中心急诊科就诊的874名成年感染性或感染性休克患者。主要结局是比较NLR和乳酸对住院死亡率的预后价值。次要结局比较它们在不同脓毒症亚组中的预后价值。结果:逐步logistic回归显示NLR与住院死亡率无相关性(OR=1.003, p=0.544),而乳酸与住院死亡率有显著相关性(OR=1.188, p)。结论:本研究中,乳酸与住院死亡率无相关性,而NLR与住院死亡率无相关性。在脓毒症患者和大多数亚组中,乳酸和NLR之间的auc没有显著差异。然而,在以下亚组中,乳酸优于NLR:白蛋白
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Prognostic Value of Lactate to the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Among Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Lactate has long been recognized as a key prognostic biomarker in sepsis. Similarly, the prognostic role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in various conditions, including sepsis. Previous studies have explored the optimal NLR cutoff to differentiate sepsis survivors from nonsurvivors, predict bacteremia, diagnose sepsis, and assess mortality. This study compares the prognostic value of lactate and NLR in septic patients.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 874 adult septic or septic shock patients presenting to a tertiary care center's Emergency Department between September 2018 and February 2021. The primary outcome was to compare the prognostic value of NLR and lactate regarding in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes compared their prognostic value in different septic subgroups.

Results: Stepwise logistic regression showed NLR was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.003, p=0.544), while lactate was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR=1.188, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the AUCs of NLR and lactate (0.552 vs 0.591, p=0.22). Lactate outperformed NLR in patients with albumin <30, those <65 years old, and those with sepsis from a urinary tract infection. No significant differences were found in AUCs between lactate and NLR in patients with septic shock, Lactate<2, Lactate≥2, diabetes, malignancy, chronic kidney diseases, other sources of infection, albumin ≥30 and age ≥ 65.

Conclusion: In this study, lactate but not NLR was associated with in-hospital mortality. There was no significant difference in the AUCs between lactate and NLR among sepsis patients and among most of the subgroups. However, lactate outperformed NLR in the following subgroups: albumin<30 g/L, patients <65 years old and patients with sepsis due to a urinary tract infection. Our results advocate for the continued use of serum lactate rather than NLR, despite its limitations, as a predictor of mortality among septic patients and the different subgroups in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信