探索以生肉为基础的饮食对狗和猫的普及程度:西班牙的一项横断面民意调查。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Record Pub Date : 2025-05-17 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1002/vetr.5013
David Díaz-Regañón, Celia Llorca, Ángel Sainz, Fernando Rodríguez-Franco, Alejandra Villaescusa, Patricia Olmeda, Mercedes García-Sancho
{"title":"探索以生肉为基础的饮食对狗和猫的普及程度:西班牙的一项横断面民意调查。","authors":"David Díaz-Regañón, Celia Llorca, Ángel Sainz, Fernando Rodríguez-Franco, Alejandra Villaescusa, Patricia Olmeda, Mercedes García-Sancho","doi":"10.1002/vetr.5013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the general public's knowledge and usage patterns of pet food, particularly regarding raw meat-based diets (RMBDs), is limited in many countries, including Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted to assess the Spanish population's understanding and perceptions of RMBDs for cats and dogs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 712 respondents, 46.77% were familiar with RMBDs, and 6% of pet owners reported using them. Dogs (7.61%) were more likely to be fed an RMBDs than cats (3.23%). While 66% of those familiar with RMBDs believed in their benefits, 96.40% recognised potential disadvantages. Concerns about risks to pets (63%) and those handling the food items (44.74%) were noted. Moreover, almost one in four owners (22.58%) who fed their pet an RMBDs lived with immunologically vulnerable people. Interestingly, confidence in veterinary advice was lower among owners using these diets.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations intrinsic to questionnaire studies, such as potential response bias, are acknowledged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the importance of improved veterinarian‒client communication regarding pet nutrition, emphasising the need for veterinarians to play a more active educational role.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e5013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the popularity of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats: A cross-sectional opinion survey in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"David Díaz-Regañón, Celia Llorca, Ángel Sainz, Fernando Rodríguez-Franco, Alejandra Villaescusa, Patricia Olmeda, Mercedes García-Sancho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/vetr.5013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the general public's knowledge and usage patterns of pet food, particularly regarding raw meat-based diets (RMBDs), is limited in many countries, including Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted to assess the Spanish population's understanding and perceptions of RMBDs for cats and dogs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 712 respondents, 46.77% were familiar with RMBDs, and 6% of pet owners reported using them. Dogs (7.61%) were more likely to be fed an RMBDs than cats (3.23%). While 66% of those familiar with RMBDs believed in their benefits, 96.40% recognised potential disadvantages. Concerns about risks to pets (63%) and those handling the food items (44.74%) were noted. Moreover, almost one in four owners (22.58%) who fed their pet an RMBDs lived with immunologically vulnerable people. Interestingly, confidence in veterinary advice was lower among owners using these diets.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations intrinsic to questionnaire studies, such as potential response bias, are acknowledged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the importance of improved veterinarian‒client communication regarding pet nutrition, emphasising the need for veterinarians to play a more active educational role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Record\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e5013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在包括西班牙在内的许多国家,对普通公众对宠物食品的认识和使用模式,特别是对生肉为主的宠物食品(rmbd)的研究有限。方法:采用匿名横断面网络调查,评估西班牙人口对猫和狗的人民币的理解和看法。结果:在712名受访者中,46.77%的人熟悉人民币,6%的宠物主人使用人民币。狗(7.61%)比猫(3.23%)更有可能被喂食人民币。虽然66%熟悉人民币的人相信其好处,但96.40%的人认为其潜在的缺点。对宠物(63%)和处理食品的人(44.74%)的风险表示担忧。此外,近四分之一(22.58%)用人民币喂养宠物的主人与免疫系统脆弱的人一起生活。有趣的是,使用这些饮食的主人对兽医建议的信心较低。局限性:问卷研究固有的局限性,如潜在的反应偏差,是公认的。结论:本研究强调了改善兽医与客户在宠物营养方面沟通的重要性,强调兽医需要发挥更积极的教育作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the popularity of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats: A cross-sectional opinion survey in Spain.

Exploring the popularity of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats: A cross-sectional opinion survey in Spain.

Exploring the popularity of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats: A cross-sectional opinion survey in Spain.

Exploring the popularity of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats: A cross-sectional opinion survey in Spain.

Background: Research on the general public's knowledge and usage patterns of pet food, particularly regarding raw meat-based diets (RMBDs), is limited in many countries, including Spain.

Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted to assess the Spanish population's understanding and perceptions of RMBDs for cats and dogs.

Results: Of the 712 respondents, 46.77% were familiar with RMBDs, and 6% of pet owners reported using them. Dogs (7.61%) were more likely to be fed an RMBDs than cats (3.23%). While 66% of those familiar with RMBDs believed in their benefits, 96.40% recognised potential disadvantages. Concerns about risks to pets (63%) and those handling the food items (44.74%) were noted. Moreover, almost one in four owners (22.58%) who fed their pet an RMBDs lived with immunologically vulnerable people. Interestingly, confidence in veterinary advice was lower among owners using these diets.

Limitations: Limitations intrinsic to questionnaire studies, such as potential response bias, are acknowledged.

Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of improved veterinarian‒client communication regarding pet nutrition, emphasising the need for veterinarians to play a more active educational role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信