双切口技术联合皮质钮扣和干涉螺钉固定治疗肱二头肌远端骨折的疗效:一个病例系列。

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brandon T Fisher, Alexander Cm Chong, Kevin P Feltz, Howard T Berglund, Jason L Hurd
{"title":"双切口技术联合皮质钮扣和干涉螺钉固定治疗肱二头肌远端骨折的疗效:一个病例系列。","authors":"Brandon T Fisher, Alexander Cm Chong, Kevin P Feltz, Howard T Berglund, Jason L Hurd","doi":"10.1177/17585732241312212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241312212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon T Fisher, Alexander Cm Chong, Kevin P Feltz, Howard T Berglund, Jason L Hurd\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732241312212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732241312212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755422/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241312212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241312212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂是一种损伤,可导致力量和耐力显著降低。通过单切口技术采用皮质钮扣和干涉螺钉联合固定。有有限的资料描述该技术采用双切口入路。本研究描述了经双切口入路采用皮质钮扣和干涉螺钉联合固定进行初级二头肌远端修复的患者结果。方法:这是对2006年1月至2020年2月在中西部一家机构内的患者进行的病例系列分析。我们检查了患者人口统计学、术中效率变量、患者结局和术后并发症。结果:共纳入62例,其中男性62例;急性完全破裂44例,急性部分破裂1例,慢性完全破裂8例,慢性部分破裂9例)。平均手术时间48±23 min。术后活动范围(ROM)结果显示89%-92%肘关节ROM参数满意。有两例术后并发症报道,但没有出现神经失用、伤口裂开、关节闭锁、桡骨近端骨折或固定失败的病例。结论:本研究结果表明该方法安全、可靠、有效。这将有助于外科医生确定最佳的固定方法和入路,以减少二头肌远端骨折患者的术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series.

Background: Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.

Methods: This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.

Results: Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信