{"title":"交叉韧带损伤患者外侧半月板后根撕裂的术前MRI诊断中，裂截三角征象的联合应用有助于提高诊断水平。","authors":"Aritoshi Yoshihara, Caroline Mouton, Renaud Siboni, Tomomasa Nakamura, Ichiro Sekiya, Hideyuki Koga, Romain Seil, Yusuke Nakagawa","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether combining the analysis of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs enhances the diagnostic accuracy of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. We hypothesised that analysing the cleft, ghost and truncated triangle signs and lateral meniscus extrusion (LME) measurement together would improve the preoperative MRI-based diagnosis of LMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used prospectively collected registry data from two academic centres, including patients undergoing primary or revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and LMPRT repair. The control group included age- and sex-matched (1:1) patients undergoing ACLR without any lateral meniscus tears. LME (mm) and the presence of cleft, ghost and/or truncated triangle signs were evaluated using preoperative MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 252 patients (126 per group) were included. Individually, the cleft and truncated triangle signs achieved the highest sensitivity (60% and 62%, respectively) and accuracy (>89%). The presence of either sign increased sensitivity to 79% and enabled the correct classification of 93% of ACL injuries as having or not having an LMPRT, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination was considered the most efficient in reducing false positives and false negatives. The LME (cutoff value: 2.2 mm) and ghost sign had lower sensitivities (50% and 14%, respectively) and accuracies (83% and 87%) and were not part of the optimal combination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleft and/or truncated triangle signs on preoperative MRI reliably detected 79% of LMPRTs in this cohort, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination provides an effective method for achieving reasonable sensitivity while minimising false positives, aiding surgeons in preoperative diagnosis and planning for LMPRT repair.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined use of cleft and truncated triangle signs helps improve the preoperative MRI diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in patients with ACL injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Aritoshi Yoshihara, Caroline Mouton, Renaud Siboni, Tomomasa Nakamura, Ichiro Sekiya, Hideyuki Koga, Romain Seil, Yusuke Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether combining the analysis of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs enhances the diagnostic accuracy of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. We hypothesised that analysing the cleft, ghost and truncated triangle signs and lateral meniscus extrusion (LME) measurement together would improve the preoperative MRI-based diagnosis of LMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used prospectively collected registry data from two academic centres, including patients undergoing primary or revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and LMPRT repair. The control group included age- and sex-matched (1:1) patients undergoing ACLR without any lateral meniscus tears. LME (mm) and the presence of cleft, ghost and/or truncated triangle signs were evaluated using preoperative MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 252 patients (126 per group) were included. Individually, the cleft and truncated triangle signs achieved the highest sensitivity (60% and 62%, respectively) and accuracy (>89%). The presence of either sign increased sensitivity to 79% and enabled the correct classification of 93% of ACL injuries as having or not having an LMPRT, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination was considered the most efficient in reducing false positives and false negatives. The LME (cutoff value: 2.2 mm) and ghost sign had lower sensitivities (50% and 14%, respectively) and accuracies (83% and 87%) and were not part of the optimal combination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleft and/or truncated triangle signs on preoperative MRI reliably detected 79% of LMPRTs in this cohort, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination provides an effective method for achieving reasonable sensitivity while minimising false positives, aiding surgeons in preoperative diagnosis and planning for LMPRT repair.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12597\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined use of cleft and truncated triangle signs helps improve the preoperative MRI diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in patients with ACL injuries.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether combining the analysis of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs enhances the diagnostic accuracy of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. We hypothesised that analysing the cleft, ghost and truncated triangle signs and lateral meniscus extrusion (LME) measurement together would improve the preoperative MRI-based diagnosis of LMPRTs.
Methods: This retrospective study used prospectively collected registry data from two academic centres, including patients undergoing primary or revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and LMPRT repair. The control group included age- and sex-matched (1:1) patients undergoing ACLR without any lateral meniscus tears. LME (mm) and the presence of cleft, ghost and/or truncated triangle signs were evaluated using preoperative MRI.
Results: In total, 252 patients (126 per group) were included. Individually, the cleft and truncated triangle signs achieved the highest sensitivity (60% and 62%, respectively) and accuracy (>89%). The presence of either sign increased sensitivity to 79% and enabled the correct classification of 93% of ACL injuries as having or not having an LMPRT, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination was considered the most efficient in reducing false positives and false negatives. The LME (cutoff value: 2.2 mm) and ghost sign had lower sensitivities (50% and 14%, respectively) and accuracies (83% and 87%) and were not part of the optimal combination.
Conclusion: The cleft and/or truncated triangle signs on preoperative MRI reliably detected 79% of LMPRTs in this cohort, with high specificity (95%) and good positive predictive value (74%). This combination provides an effective method for achieving reasonable sensitivity while minimising false positives, aiding surgeons in preoperative diagnosis and planning for LMPRT repair.
期刊介绍：
Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication.
The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance.
Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards.
Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
