COVID-19大流行期间患者和家庭参与感染预防:加拿大大学卫生保健中心利益相关者的q -方法学研究

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal), Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec), Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg), Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University), Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间患者和家庭参与感染预防:加拿大大学卫生保健中心利益相关者的q -方法学研究","authors":"Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal),&nbsp;Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec),&nbsp;Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre),&nbsp;Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre),&nbsp;Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg),&nbsp;Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University),&nbsp;Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Family Engagement in Infection Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Q-Methodology Study with Stakeholders from a Canadian University Health Care Center\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal),&nbsp;Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec),&nbsp;Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre),&nbsp;Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre),&nbsp;Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg),&nbsp;Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University),&nbsp;Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 270-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024003416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024003416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健相关感染是住院患者常见的并发症,COVID-19大流行加剧了这一问题。本研究旨在探讨利益相关者对患者和家庭应如何参与预防医院环境中卫生保健相关感染的观点。方法:作者采用q方法,这是一种结合个人因素分析和深度访谈的混合方法,以捕捉参与者之间的共同观点。这项研究是在一所大学附属的成人移植单位进行的,目的是对工作人员、患者和家属进行抽样调查。参与者使用Q-sorTouch网络应用程序在平板电脑上对40个预先选择的陈述进行排序(例如,“工作人员应该检查患者和家属在关键时刻洗手”),从“最同意”(+2)到“最不同意”(-2)不等。然后,参与者参加了深度访谈,详细说明他们的排名。数据分析包括因素提取和专题解读。结果:19名参与者完成了研究。分析揭示了患者和家庭参与感染预防和控制的三种不同观点:(1)卫生保健专业人员确保患者和家庭遵守的控制方法;(2)支持分担责任并强调自主权的支持方法;(3)将患者和家庭成员视为警惕的合作伙伴。出现了七项共识声明,表明对患者和家属被动而不是主动的策略达成一致。结论:虽然强调卫生保健专业监督的家长式模式盛行,但倡导患者和家庭更大的自主权和责任的替代观点也出现了。这些不同的观点表明,关于如何最好地使患者及其家属参与感染控制,特别是在高风险时期,正在进行辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and Family Engagement in Infection Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Q-Methodology Study with Stakeholders from a Canadian University Health Care Center

Background

Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.

Methods

The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.

Results

Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.

Conclusion

Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信