Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal), Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec), Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg), Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University), Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间患者和家庭参与感染预防:加拿大大学卫生保健中心利益相关者的q -方法学研究","authors":"Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal), Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec), Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg), Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University), Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Family Engagement in Infection Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Q-Methodology Study with Stakeholders from a Canadian University Health Care Center\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Clavel PhD (Assistant Professor, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal), Jesseca Paquette MSc (Research Professional, Institut de la Statistique du Québec), Anaïck Briand MSc (Nursing Practice Consultant, Department of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Alain Biron PhD (Director of Nursing, McGill University Health Centre), Laurence Bernard PhD (Professor, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg), Céline Gélinas PhD (Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University), Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay PhD (Professor, Department of Nursing, University of Montreal. Please address correspondence to Nathalie Clavel)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 270-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024003416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024003416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient and Family Engagement in Infection Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Q-Methodology Study with Stakeholders from a Canadian University Health Care Center
Background
Health care–associated infections are frequent complications for hospitalized patients, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ viewpoints on how patients and families should engage in preventing health care–associated infections in hospital settings.
Methods
The authors employed Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach combining by-person factor analysis with in-depth interviews to capture shared viewpoints among participants. The research was conducted in a university-affiliated adult transplant unit using a purposive sample of staff members, patients, and family members. Participants ranked 40 preselected statements on a tablet using the Q-sorTouch Web application (for example, “Staff members should check that patients and family members wash their hands at key moments”) on a continuum from “most agree” (+2) to “most disagree” (-2). Participants then took part in in-depth interviews to elaborate on their rankings. Data analysis included factor extraction and thematic interpretation.
Results
Nineteen participants completed the study. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints on patient and family engagement in infection prevention and control: (1) a controlling approach in which health care professionals ensure patient and family compliance, (2) an enabling approach that supports shared responsibility and emphasizes autonomy, and (3) a view of patients and family members as vigilant partners. Seven consensus statements emerged, indicating agreement on strategies in which patients and families are passive rather than proactive.
Conclusion
Although a paternalistic model emphasizing health care professional oversight prevailed, alternative perspectives emerged advocating for greater autonomy and responsibility among patients and families. These differing opinions indicate ongoing debate about how best to involve patients and their families in infection control, particularly during periods of heightened risk.