{"title":"有效隔离上腔静脉的新型全极定位技术:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Naoto Oguri MD, Yousaku Okubo MD, PhD, Naoki Ishibashi MD, Junji Maeda MD, Takumi Sakai MD, Yukimi Uotani MD, Motoki Furutani MD, Shogo Miyamoto MD, Shunsuke Miyauchi MD, PhD, Sho Okamura MD, PhD, Takehito Tokuyama MD, PhD, Noboru Oda MD, PhD, Yukiko Nakano MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, <i>p</i> = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, <i>p</i> = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, <i>p</i> = .023).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel omnipolar mapping technology for effective superior vena cava isolation: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Naoto Oguri MD, Yousaku Okubo MD, PhD, Naoki Ishibashi MD, Junji Maeda MD, Takumi Sakai MD, Yukimi Uotani MD, Motoki Furutani MD, Shogo Miyamoto MD, Shunsuke Miyauchi MD, PhD, Sho Okamura MD, PhD, Takehito Tokuyama MD, PhD, Noboru Oda MD, PhD, Yukiko Nakano MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, <i>p</i> = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, <i>p</i> = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, <i>p</i> = .023).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:使用右心房(RA)和上腔静脉(SVC)之间的功能性传导阻滞成功分离上腔静脉(SVC)已被证实。然而,这种方法与基于血管造影的RA-SVC连接处的常规方法(CM)的环形消融的比较仍未被探索。目的:在本研究中,我们采用创新的全极定位技术(OT)来识别RA-SVC连接,并将临床结果与CM进行比较。方法:62例接受SVC分离的患者按1:1的比例随机分为OT组或CM组。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。我们评估了两组的疗效和安全性。结果:两组SVC分离的急性成功率相当(96%),但OT组需要较少的射频(RF)应用(13.6±6.0 vs. 19.8±10.9,p = 0.046)和更短的手术时间(9.6±6.8 min vs. 14.3±6.8 min, p = 0.007)。OT组总吸收剂量明显低于对照组(69.6±47.6 mGy vs. 90.3±30.3 mGy, p = 0.023)。结论:与常规治疗方法相比,OT增强了SVC分离的疗效,需要更少的射频应用,缩短了手术时间。
Novel omnipolar mapping technology for effective superior vena cava isolation: A randomized clinical trial
Background
Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.
Objective
In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.
Methods
Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.
Results
Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, p = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, p = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, p = .023).
Conclusions
The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.