{"title":"AlphaFold3 在 RNA 方面取得了成功吗?","authors":"Clément Bernard, Guillaume Postic, Sahar Ghannay, Fariza Tahi","doi":"10.1107/S2059798325000592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting the 3D structure of RNA is a significant challenge despite ongoing advancements in the field. Although AlphaFold has successfully addressed this problem for proteins, RNA structure prediction raises difficulties due to the fundamental differences between proteins and RNA, which hinder its direct adaptation. The latest release of AlphaFold, AlphaFold3, has broadened its scope to include multiple different molecules such as DNA, ligands and RNA. While the AlphaFold3 article discussed the results for the last CASP-RNA data set, the scope of its performance and the limitations for RNA are unclear. In this article, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the performance of AlphaFold3 in the prediction of 3D structures of RNA. Through an extensive benchmark over five different test sets, we discuss the performance and limitations of AlphaFold3. We also compare its performance with ten existing state-of-the-art ab initio, template-based and deep-learning approaches. Our results are freely available on the EvryRNA platform at https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/evryrna/alphafold3/.</p>","PeriodicalId":7116,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?\",\"authors\":\"Clément Bernard, Guillaume Postic, Sahar Ghannay, Fariza Tahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1107/S2059798325000592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Predicting the 3D structure of RNA is a significant challenge despite ongoing advancements in the field. Although AlphaFold has successfully addressed this problem for proteins, RNA structure prediction raises difficulties due to the fundamental differences between proteins and RNA, which hinder its direct adaptation. The latest release of AlphaFold, AlphaFold3, has broadened its scope to include multiple different molecules such as DNA, ligands and RNA. While the AlphaFold3 article discussed the results for the last CASP-RNA data set, the scope of its performance and the limitations for RNA are unclear. In this article, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the performance of AlphaFold3 in the prediction of 3D structures of RNA. Through an extensive benchmark over five different test sets, we discuss the performance and limitations of AlphaFold3. We also compare its performance with ten existing state-of-the-art ab initio, template-based and deep-learning approaches. Our results are freely available on the EvryRNA platform at https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/evryrna/alphafold3/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798325000592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798325000592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting the 3D structure of RNA is a significant challenge despite ongoing advancements in the field. Although AlphaFold has successfully addressed this problem for proteins, RNA structure prediction raises difficulties due to the fundamental differences between proteins and RNA, which hinder its direct adaptation. The latest release of AlphaFold, AlphaFold3, has broadened its scope to include multiple different molecules such as DNA, ligands and RNA. While the AlphaFold3 article discussed the results for the last CASP-RNA data set, the scope of its performance and the limitations for RNA are unclear. In this article, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the performance of AlphaFold3 in the prediction of 3D structures of RNA. Through an extensive benchmark over five different test sets, we discuss the performance and limitations of AlphaFold3. We also compare its performance with ten existing state-of-the-art ab initio, template-based and deep-learning approaches. Our results are freely available on the EvryRNA platform at https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/evryrna/alphafold3/.
期刊介绍:
Acta Crystallographica Section D welcomes the submission of articles covering any aspect of structural biology, with a particular emphasis on the structures of biological macromolecules or the methods used to determine them.
Reports on new structures of biological importance may address the smallest macromolecules to the largest complex molecular machines. These structures may have been determined using any structural biology technique including crystallography, NMR, cryoEM and/or other techniques. The key criterion is that such articles must present significant new insights into biological, chemical or medical sciences. The inclusion of complementary data that support the conclusions drawn from the structural studies (such as binding studies, mass spectrometry, enzyme assays, or analysis of mutants or other modified forms of biological macromolecule) is encouraged.
Methods articles may include new approaches to any aspect of biological structure determination or structure analysis but will only be accepted where they focus on new methods that are demonstrated to be of general applicability and importance to structural biology. Articles describing particularly difficult problems in structural biology are also welcomed, if the analysis would provide useful insights to others facing similar problems.