Pasquale Salerno , Mirko Job , Matteo Iurato , Monica Biggio , Marco Testa , Marco Bove , Ambra Bisio
{"title":"用动态关节位置再现任务评估本体感觉敏锐度的见解。","authors":"Pasquale Salerno , Mirko Job , Matteo Iurato , Monica Biggio , Marco Testa , Marco Bove , Ambra Bisio","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.102984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated proprioceptive acuity using the conventional joint position reproduction (JPR) task and a modified version, the Dynamic JPR task (D-JPR), during Concentric and Eccentric muscle contractions. Seventeen participants were recruited and received a tactile stimulus indicating the position cue at Initial (INI), Intermediate (INT), and Final (FIN) phases of movements, during either the concentric or eccentric phases. After the movement, they replicated the position where they received the stimulus. Angular error (AE) and movement velocity were analysed. AE was higher in the D-JPR than in JPR Task, and in Concentric than Eccentric contractions. Within the D-JPR Task, during Concentric contractions, AE was lower at FIN phase compared to INI and INT phases, and at INT phase compared to INI phase, whereas in Eccentric contraction AE was lower in FIN compared to INI phase. Significant correlations between movement velocity at the time of stimulus delivery and AE were found in both types of contractions. Proprioceptive acuity was affected by task type, muscle contraction, movement phase, and movement velocity, highlighting the need to consider these factors for accurate and ecological assessments of proprioception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into proprioceptive acuity assessed with a dynamic joint position reproduction task\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale Salerno , Mirko Job , Matteo Iurato , Monica Biggio , Marco Testa , Marco Bove , Ambra Bisio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.102984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated proprioceptive acuity using the conventional joint position reproduction (JPR) task and a modified version, the Dynamic JPR task (D-JPR), during Concentric and Eccentric muscle contractions. Seventeen participants were recruited and received a tactile stimulus indicating the position cue at Initial (INI), Intermediate (INT), and Final (FIN) phases of movements, during either the concentric or eccentric phases. After the movement, they replicated the position where they received the stimulus. Angular error (AE) and movement velocity were analysed. AE was higher in the D-JPR than in JPR Task, and in Concentric than Eccentric contractions. Within the D-JPR Task, during Concentric contractions, AE was lower at FIN phase compared to INI and INT phases, and at INT phase compared to INI phase, whereas in Eccentric contraction AE was lower in FIN compared to INI phase. Significant correlations between movement velocity at the time of stimulus delivery and AE were found in both types of contractions. Proprioceptive acuity was affected by task type, muscle contraction, movement phase, and movement velocity, highlighting the need to consider these factors for accurate and ecological assessments of proprioception.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641125000100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641125000100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights into proprioceptive acuity assessed with a dynamic joint position reproduction task
This study investigated proprioceptive acuity using the conventional joint position reproduction (JPR) task and a modified version, the Dynamic JPR task (D-JPR), during Concentric and Eccentric muscle contractions. Seventeen participants were recruited and received a tactile stimulus indicating the position cue at Initial (INI), Intermediate (INT), and Final (FIN) phases of movements, during either the concentric or eccentric phases. After the movement, they replicated the position where they received the stimulus. Angular error (AE) and movement velocity were analysed. AE was higher in the D-JPR than in JPR Task, and in Concentric than Eccentric contractions. Within the D-JPR Task, during Concentric contractions, AE was lower at FIN phase compared to INI and INT phases, and at INT phase compared to INI phase, whereas in Eccentric contraction AE was lower in FIN compared to INI phase. Significant correlations between movement velocity at the time of stimulus delivery and AE were found in both types of contractions. Proprioceptive acuity was affected by task type, muscle contraction, movement phase, and movement velocity, highlighting the need to consider these factors for accurate and ecological assessments of proprioception.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques.
As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.