IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Helen M Haydon, Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Andrew Broadbent, Centaine L Snoswell, Anthony C Smith, Julie-Ann Brydon, Liam J Caffery, Emma E Thomas
{"title":"Telehealth-facilitated palliative care enables more people to die at home: An analysis of clinical outcomes and service activity data.","authors":"Helen M Haydon, Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Andrew Broadbent, Centaine L Snoswell, Anthony C Smith, Julie-Ann Brydon, Liam J Caffery, Emma E Thomas","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01622-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth-facilitated models of palliative care are a patient-focused way to deliver specialist care in or closer to home for people with a life-limiting illness. Telehealth can increase access to palliative care and support people experiencing symptoms of advanced disease in their own home, reducing the discomfort of travel. This retrospective cohort study examines the activity and outcomes of a regional telehealth-facilitated palliative care service to (i) describe which patients are most likely to use telehealth; and (ii) explore possible impacts of telehealth on patient outcomes including place of death, timely access to care, responsiveness to urgent needs and pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of service activity data (patient demographics, care modality, consultation frequency) and Palliative Care Outcomes Collaborative data registry (place of death, timely access to palliative care, responsiveness to urgent needs as measured by time in unstable phase, pain management) were undertaken. Outcomes were compared between patients who had no videoconsultations (n = 683) and those who had one or more videoconsultations (n = 524).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to people who had no videoconsultations, those who had at least one appointment via video were: more than twice as likely to die at home and spent a shorter amount of time in the unstable phase of palliation. Mixed results were found regarding timely access to palliative care. There was no significant difference in pain management between consultation modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telehealth-facilitated palliative care has multiple benefits, including the increased likelihood of fulfilling someone's wish to die at home, often their preferred place of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01622-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由远程医疗提供支持的姑息关怀模式是一种以病人为中心的方式,在家中或离家较近的地方为患有生命垂危疾病的病人提供专科护理。远程医疗可以增加姑息关怀的可及性,并为在自己家中出现晚期疾病症状的患者提供支持,减少旅行带来的不适。这项回顾性队列研究对地区性远程医疗姑息关怀服务的活动和结果进行了调查,目的是:(i)描述哪些病人最有可能使用远程医疗;(ii)探讨远程医疗对病人结果可能产生的影响,包括死亡地点、及时获得关怀、对紧急需求的响应和疼痛管理:方法:对服务活动数据(患者人口统计学、护理方式、咨询频率)和姑息治疗结果合作数据登记(死亡地点、及时获得姑息治疗、对紧急需求的响应(以不稳定期时间和疼痛管理来衡量))进行分析。对未接受过视频咨询的患者(683人)和接受过一次或多次视频咨询的患者(524人)的治疗结果进行了比较:结果:与没有接受过视频会诊的患者相比,至少接受过一次视频会诊的患者在家中去世的几率要高出一倍多,而且处于不稳定缓解阶段的时间较短。在及时获得姑息治疗方面,结果不一。不同咨询模式在疼痛管理方面没有明显差异:结论:远程医疗协助下的姑息关怀有多种益处,包括更有可能实现患者在家中死亡的愿望,而这往往是他们首选的死亡地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telehealth-facilitated palliative care enables more people to die at home: An analysis of clinical outcomes and service activity data.

Background: Telehealth-facilitated models of palliative care are a patient-focused way to deliver specialist care in or closer to home for people with a life-limiting illness. Telehealth can increase access to palliative care and support people experiencing symptoms of advanced disease in their own home, reducing the discomfort of travel. This retrospective cohort study examines the activity and outcomes of a regional telehealth-facilitated palliative care service to (i) describe which patients are most likely to use telehealth; and (ii) explore possible impacts of telehealth on patient outcomes including place of death, timely access to care, responsiveness to urgent needs and pain management.

Methods: Analysis of service activity data (patient demographics, care modality, consultation frequency) and Palliative Care Outcomes Collaborative data registry (place of death, timely access to palliative care, responsiveness to urgent needs as measured by time in unstable phase, pain management) were undertaken. Outcomes were compared between patients who had no videoconsultations (n = 683) and those who had one or more videoconsultations (n = 524).

Results: Compared to people who had no videoconsultations, those who had at least one appointment via video were: more than twice as likely to die at home and spent a shorter amount of time in the unstable phase of palliation. Mixed results were found regarding timely access to palliative care. There was no significant difference in pain management between consultation modes.

Conclusion: Telehealth-facilitated palliative care has multiple benefits, including the increased likelihood of fulfilling someone's wish to die at home, often their preferred place of death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信