优化TMS剂量法:评估有效电场作为一种新的度量。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Micol Colella, Micaela Liberti, Filippo Carducci, Giorgio Leodori, Giacomo Maria Russo, Francesca Apollonio, Alessandra Paffi
{"title":"优化TMS剂量法:评估有效电场作为一种新的度量。","authors":"Micol Colella, Micaela Liberti, Filippo Carducci, Giorgio Leodori, Giacomo Maria Russo, Francesca Apollonio, Alessandra Paffi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adae4b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study introduces the effective electric field (<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>) as a novel observable for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) numerical dosimetry.<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>represents the electric field component aligned with the local orientation of cortical and white matter (WM) neuronal elements. To assess the utility of<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>as a predictive measure for TMS outcomes, we evaluated its correlation with TMS induced muscle responses and compared it against conventional observables, including the electric (<i>E</i>-)field magnitude, and its components normal and tangential to the cortical surface.<i>Approach.</i>Using a custom-made software for TMS dosimetry, the<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>is calculated combining TMS dosimetric results from an anisotropic head model with tractography data of gray and white matter (GM and WM). To test the hypothesis that<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>has a stronger correlation with muscle response, a proof-of-concept experiment was conducted. Seven TMS sessions, with different coil rotations, targeted the primary motor area of a healthy subject. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle.<i>Main results.</i>The<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>trend for the seven TMS coil rotations closely matched the measured MEP response, displaying an ascending pattern that peaked and then symmetrically declined. In contrast, the<i>E</i>-field magnitude and its components tangential (<i>E</i><sub>tan</sub>) and normal (<i>E</i><sub>norm</sub>) to the cortical surface were less responsive to coil orientation changes.<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>showed a strong correlation with MEPs (<i>r</i>= 0.8), while the other observables had a weaker correlation (0.5 for<i>E</i><sub>norm</sub>and below 0.2 for<i>E</i>-field magnitude and<i>E</i><sub>tan</sub>).<i>Significance.</i>This study is the first to evaluate<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>, a novel component of the TMS induced<i>E</i>-field. Derived using tractography data from both white and GM,<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>inherently captures axonal organization and local orientation. By demonstrating its correlation with MEPs, this work introduces<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>as a promising observable for future TMS dosimetric studies, with the potential to improve the precision of TMS applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing TMS dosimetry: evaluating the effective electric field as a novel metric.\",\"authors\":\"Micol Colella, Micaela Liberti, Filippo Carducci, Giorgio Leodori, Giacomo Maria Russo, Francesca Apollonio, Alessandra Paffi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adae4b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study introduces the effective electric field (<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>) as a novel observable for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) numerical dosimetry.<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>represents the electric field component aligned with the local orientation of cortical and white matter (WM) neuronal elements. To assess the utility of<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>as a predictive measure for TMS outcomes, we evaluated its correlation with TMS induced muscle responses and compared it against conventional observables, including the electric (<i>E</i>-)field magnitude, and its components normal and tangential to the cortical surface.<i>Approach.</i>Using a custom-made software for TMS dosimetry, the<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>is calculated combining TMS dosimetric results from an anisotropic head model with tractography data of gray and white matter (GM and WM). To test the hypothesis that<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>has a stronger correlation with muscle response, a proof-of-concept experiment was conducted. Seven TMS sessions, with different coil rotations, targeted the primary motor area of a healthy subject. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle.<i>Main results.</i>The<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>trend for the seven TMS coil rotations closely matched the measured MEP response, displaying an ascending pattern that peaked and then symmetrically declined. In contrast, the<i>E</i>-field magnitude and its components tangential (<i>E</i><sub>tan</sub>) and normal (<i>E</i><sub>norm</sub>) to the cortical surface were less responsive to coil orientation changes.<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>showed a strong correlation with MEPs (<i>r</i>= 0.8), while the other observables had a weaker correlation (0.5 for<i>E</i><sub>norm</sub>and below 0.2 for<i>E</i>-field magnitude and<i>E</i><sub>tan</sub>).<i>Significance.</i>This study is the first to evaluate<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>, a novel component of the TMS induced<i>E</i>-field. Derived using tractography data from both white and GM,<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>inherently captures axonal organization and local orientation. By demonstrating its correlation with MEPs, this work introduces<i>E</i><sub>eff</sub>as a promising observable for future TMS dosimetric studies, with the potential to improve the precision of TMS applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adae4b\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adae4b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:介绍有效电场(Eeff)作为经颅磁刺激(TMS)数值剂量学中一种新的观测值。Eeff表示与皮层和白质神经元局部方向一致的电场分量。为了评估Eeff作为经颅磁刺激结果预测指标的效用,我们评估了Eeff与经颅磁刺激诱导的肌肉反应的相关性,并将其与常规观察结果进行了比较,包括电场(E-)强度,以及其正常和切向皮质表面的分量。方法:使用定制的TMS剂量测定软件,结合各向异性头部模型的TMS剂量测定结果和灰质和白质的牵道成像数据计算Eeff。为了验证Eeff与肌肉反应有更强相关性的假设,进行了一个概念验证实验。七次不同线圈旋转的经颅磁刺激以健康受试者的初级运动区域为目标。记录第一背骨间肌运动诱发电位(MEPs)。主要结果:7次经颅磁刺激线圈旋转的Eeff趋势与测量的MEP响应密切匹配,呈现上升模式,达到峰值,然后对称下降。相反,电场大小及其在皮层表面的切向分量(Etan)和法向分量(Enorm)对线圈方向变化的响应较小。Eeff与MEPs的相关性较强(r = 0.8),而其他观测值的相关性较弱(Enorm为0.5,电场强度和Etan低于0.2)。意义:本研究首次对Eeff这一经颅磁刺激诱导电场的新成分进行了评价。利用来自白质和灰质的神经束成像数据,Eeff固有地捕获轴突组织和局部方向。通过证明Eeff与MEPs的相关性,本研究将Eeff作为未来经颅磁刺激剂量学研究的一个有希望的观察物,具有提高经颅磁刺激应用精度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing TMS dosimetry: evaluating the effective electric field as a novel metric.

Objective. This study introduces the effective electric field (Eeff) as a novel observable for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) numerical dosimetry.Eeffrepresents the electric field component aligned with the local orientation of cortical and white matter (WM) neuronal elements. To assess the utility ofEeffas a predictive measure for TMS outcomes, we evaluated its correlation with TMS induced muscle responses and compared it against conventional observables, including the electric (E-)field magnitude, and its components normal and tangential to the cortical surface.Approach.Using a custom-made software for TMS dosimetry, theEeffis calculated combining TMS dosimetric results from an anisotropic head model with tractography data of gray and white matter (GM and WM). To test the hypothesis thatEeffhas a stronger correlation with muscle response, a proof-of-concept experiment was conducted. Seven TMS sessions, with different coil rotations, targeted the primary motor area of a healthy subject. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle.Main results.TheEefftrend for the seven TMS coil rotations closely matched the measured MEP response, displaying an ascending pattern that peaked and then symmetrically declined. In contrast, theE-field magnitude and its components tangential (Etan) and normal (Enorm) to the cortical surface were less responsive to coil orientation changes.Eeffshowed a strong correlation with MEPs (r= 0.8), while the other observables had a weaker correlation (0.5 forEnormand below 0.2 forE-field magnitude andEtan).Significance.This study is the first to evaluateEeff, a novel component of the TMS inducedE-field. Derived using tractography data from both white and GM,Eeffinherently captures axonal organization and local orientation. By demonstrating its correlation with MEPs, this work introducesEeffas a promising observable for future TMS dosimetric studies, with the potential to improve the precision of TMS applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信