基于人工智能的纵向多发性硬化 MRI 评估:临床实践中的优缺点。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sönke Peters , Lars Schmill , Carl Alexander Gless , Klarissa Stürner , Olav Jansen , Svea Seehafer
{"title":"基于人工智能的纵向多发性硬化 MRI 评估:临床实践中的优缺点。","authors":"Sönke Peters ,&nbsp;Lars Schmill ,&nbsp;Carl Alexander Gless ,&nbsp;Klarissa Stürner ,&nbsp;Olav Jansen ,&nbsp;Svea Seehafer","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In Multiple Sclerosis (MS) cerebral MRI is essential for disease and treatment monitoring. For this purpose, software solutions are available to support the radiologist with image interpretation and reporting of follow up imaging. Aim of this study was to evaluate an AI based software for longitudinal lesion detection with clinical data and to determine the influence of different MRI machines in such setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The database of a university hospital was screened for all follow up MRI of MS patients performed in 2023. The examinations were categorized in “initial and follow up imaging at the same MRI” or “initial and follow up imaging at different MRI”. The examinations were analysed with the AI based software mdbrain. The results concerning new and enlarging lesions were compared with the clinical radiologic report and with a gold standard reading.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>101 MRIs were performed at the same MRI machine and 130 at different scanners. The AI based software had a high sensitivity (1 and 0.786) and an acceptable specificity (0.74 and 0.549) concerning new or enlarging lesions in both settings. The negative predictive value was high (1 and 0.954), whereas the positive predictive value was low due to false positive new or enlarging lesions (0.444 and 0.177). The reasons for false positive lesions differed markedly in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the evaluation of follow up MR images of MS patients, an AI-based imaging analysis can be beneficial in clinical routine, especially due to a very high negative predictive value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based assessment of longitudinal multiple sclerosis MRI: Strengths and weaknesses in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Sönke Peters ,&nbsp;Lars Schmill ,&nbsp;Carl Alexander Gless ,&nbsp;Klarissa Stürner ,&nbsp;Olav Jansen ,&nbsp;Svea Seehafer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In Multiple Sclerosis (MS) cerebral MRI is essential for disease and treatment monitoring. For this purpose, software solutions are available to support the radiologist with image interpretation and reporting of follow up imaging. Aim of this study was to evaluate an AI based software for longitudinal lesion detection with clinical data and to determine the influence of different MRI machines in such setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The database of a university hospital was screened for all follow up MRI of MS patients performed in 2023. The examinations were categorized in “initial and follow up imaging at the same MRI” or “initial and follow up imaging at different MRI”. The examinations were analysed with the AI based software mdbrain. The results concerning new and enlarging lesions were compared with the clinical radiologic report and with a gold standard reading.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>101 MRIs were performed at the same MRI machine and 130 at different scanners. The AI based software had a high sensitivity (1 and 0.786) and an acceptable specificity (0.74 and 0.549) concerning new or enlarging lesions in both settings. The negative predictive value was high (1 and 0.954), whereas the positive predictive value was low due to false positive new or enlarging lesions (0.444 and 0.177). The reasons for false positive lesions differed markedly in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the evaluation of follow up MR images of MS patients, an AI-based imaging analysis can be beneficial in clinical routine, especially due to a very high negative predictive value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-based assessment of longitudinal multiple sclerosis MRI: Strengths and weaknesses in clinical practice

Objectives

In Multiple Sclerosis (MS) cerebral MRI is essential for disease and treatment monitoring. For this purpose, software solutions are available to support the radiologist with image interpretation and reporting of follow up imaging. Aim of this study was to evaluate an AI based software for longitudinal lesion detection with clinical data and to determine the influence of different MRI machines in such setting.

Methods

The database of a university hospital was screened for all follow up MRI of MS patients performed in 2023. The examinations were categorized in “initial and follow up imaging at the same MRI” or “initial and follow up imaging at different MRI”. The examinations were analysed with the AI based software mdbrain. The results concerning new and enlarging lesions were compared with the clinical radiologic report and with a gold standard reading.

Results

101 MRIs were performed at the same MRI machine and 130 at different scanners. The AI based software had a high sensitivity (1 and 0.786) and an acceptable specificity (0.74 and 0.549) concerning new or enlarging lesions in both settings. The negative predictive value was high (1 and 0.954), whereas the positive predictive value was low due to false positive new or enlarging lesions (0.444 and 0.177). The reasons for false positive lesions differed markedly in both groups.

Conclusion

For the evaluation of follow up MR images of MS patients, an AI-based imaging analysis can be beneficial in clinical routine, especially due to a very high negative predictive value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信