Charles Swanton, Velicia Bachtiar, Chris Mathews, Adam R Brentnall, Ian Lowenhoff, Jo Waller, Martine Bomb, Sean McPhail, Heather Pinches, Rebecca Smittenaar, Sara Hiom, Richard D Neal, Peter Sasieni
{"title":"NHS-Galleri试验:丰富的入组方法和入组参与者的社会人口学特征。","authors":"Charles Swanton, Velicia Bachtiar, Chris Mathews, Adam R Brentnall, Ian Lowenhoff, Jo Waller, Martine Bomb, Sean McPhail, Heather Pinches, Rebecca Smittenaar, Sara Hiom, Richard D Neal, Peter Sasieni","doi":"10.1177/17407745241302477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Certain sociodemographic groups are routinely underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting generalisability. Here, we describe the extent to which enriched enrolment approaches yielded a diverse trial population enriched for older age in a randomised controlled trial of a blood-based multi-cancer early detection test (NCT05611632).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged 50-77 years were recruited from eight Cancer Alliance regions in England. Most were identified and invited from centralised health service lists; a dynamic invitation algorithm was used to target those in older and more deprived groups. Others were invited by their general practice surgery (GP-based Participant Identification Centres in selected regions); towards the end of recruitment, specifically Asian and Black individuals were invited via this route, as part of a concerted effort to encourage enrolment among these individuals. Some participants self-referred, often following engagement activities involving community organisations. Enrolment took place in 11 mobile clinics at 151 locations that were generally more socioeconomically deprived and ethnically diverse than the England average. We reduced logistical barriers to trial participation by offering language interpretation and translation and disabled access measures. After enrolment, we examined (1) sociodemographic distribution of participants versus England and Cancer Alliance populations, and (2) number needed to invite (NNI; the number of invitations sent to enrol one participant) by age, sex, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and ethnicity, and GP surgery-level bowel screening participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 1.5 million individuals were invited and 142,924 enrolled (98% via centralised health service lists/invitation algorithm) in 10.5 months. The enrolled population was older and more deprived than the England population aged 50-77 years (73.3% vs 56.8% aged 60-77 years; 42.3% vs 35.3% in IMD groups 1-2). Ethnic diversity was lower in the trial than the England population (1.4% vs 2.8% Black; 3.3% vs 5.3% Asian). NNI was highest in Black (32.8), Asian (28.2) and most-deprived (21.5) groups, and lowest in mixed ethnicity (8.1) and least-deprived (4.6) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enrolment approaches used in the NHS-Galleri trial enabled recruitment of an older, socioeconomically diverse participant population relatively rapidly. Compared with the England and Cancer Alliance populations, the enrolled population was enriched for those in older age and more deprived groups. Better ethnicity data availability in central health service records could enable better invitation targeting to further enhance ethnically diverse recruitment. Future research should evaluate approaches used to facilitate recruitment from underrepresented groups in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NHS-Galleri trial: Enriched enrolment approaches and sociodemographic characteristics of enrolled participants.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Swanton, Velicia Bachtiar, Chris Mathews, Adam R Brentnall, Ian Lowenhoff, Jo Waller, Martine Bomb, Sean McPhail, Heather Pinches, Rebecca Smittenaar, Sara Hiom, Richard D Neal, Peter Sasieni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17407745241302477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Certain sociodemographic groups are routinely underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting generalisability. Here, we describe the extent to which enriched enrolment approaches yielded a diverse trial population enriched for older age in a randomised controlled trial of a blood-based multi-cancer early detection test (NCT05611632).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged 50-77 years were recruited from eight Cancer Alliance regions in England. Most were identified and invited from centralised health service lists; a dynamic invitation algorithm was used to target those in older and more deprived groups. Others were invited by their general practice surgery (GP-based Participant Identification Centres in selected regions); towards the end of recruitment, specifically Asian and Black individuals were invited via this route, as part of a concerted effort to encourage enrolment among these individuals. Some participants self-referred, often following engagement activities involving community organisations. Enrolment took place in 11 mobile clinics at 151 locations that were generally more socioeconomically deprived and ethnically diverse than the England average. We reduced logistical barriers to trial participation by offering language interpretation and translation and disabled access measures. After enrolment, we examined (1) sociodemographic distribution of participants versus England and Cancer Alliance populations, and (2) number needed to invite (NNI; the number of invitations sent to enrol one participant) by age, sex, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and ethnicity, and GP surgery-level bowel screening participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 1.5 million individuals were invited and 142,924 enrolled (98% via centralised health service lists/invitation algorithm) in 10.5 months. The enrolled population was older and more deprived than the England population aged 50-77 years (73.3% vs 56.8% aged 60-77 years; 42.3% vs 35.3% in IMD groups 1-2). Ethnic diversity was lower in the trial than the England population (1.4% vs 2.8% Black; 3.3% vs 5.3% Asian). NNI was highest in Black (32.8), Asian (28.2) and most-deprived (21.5) groups, and lowest in mixed ethnicity (8.1) and least-deprived (4.6) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enrolment approaches used in the NHS-Galleri trial enabled recruitment of an older, socioeconomically diverse participant population relatively rapidly. Compared with the England and Cancer Alliance populations, the enrolled population was enriched for those in older age and more deprived groups. Better ethnicity data availability in central health service records could enable better invitation targeting to further enhance ethnically diverse recruitment. Future research should evaluate approaches used to facilitate recruitment from underrepresented groups in clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"227-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241302477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241302477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:某些社会人口统计学群体在临床试验中通常代表性不足,限制了普遍性。在这里,我们描述了在一项基于血液的多种癌症早期检测试验(NCT05611632)的随机对照试验中,强化入组方法在多大程度上产生了丰富的老年试验人群。方法:从英国八个癌症联盟地区招募年龄在50-77岁的参与者。大多数是从集中卫生服务名单中确定和邀请的;一种动态邀请算法被用于针对年龄较大和较贫困的群体。其他人则由他们的全科医生(选定地区的全科医生参与者身份识别中心)邀请;在招募结束时,特别通过这一途径邀请了亚洲人和黑人,作为鼓励这些人入学的共同努力的一部分。一些参与者往往是在参与社区组织的参与活动后自我介绍的。登记在151个地点的11个流动诊所进行,这些地点通常比英格兰平均水平更缺乏社会经济和种族多样性。我们通过提供语言口译和翻译以及残疾人无障碍措施,减少了参与试验的后勤障碍。入组后,我们检查了(1)参与者与英格兰和癌症联盟人群的社会人口分布,(2)需要邀请的人数(NNI;根据年龄、性别、多重剥夺指数(IMD)和种族,以及全科医生手术水平的肠道筛查参与程度,发送邀请的数量。结果:在10.5个月内,约有150万人被邀请,142,924人注册(98%通过集中卫生服务列表/邀请算法)。入组人群比50-77岁的英格兰人口年龄更大、更贫困(73.3% vs 60-77岁的56.8%;在IMD 1-2组中为42.3% vs 35.3%)。该试验的种族多样性低于英格兰人口(1.4% vs 2.8%黑人;3.3% vs 5.3%亚洲)。NNI在黑人(32.8)、亚洲(28.2)和最贫困(21.5)群体中最高,在混合种族(8.1)和最贫困(4.6)群体中最低。结论:在NHS-Galleri试验中使用的招募方法能够相对快速地招募年龄较大、社会经济背景不同的参与者。与英格兰和癌症联盟的人群相比,入组人群中年龄较大和更贫困的人群更丰富。在中央卫生服务记录中更好地提供族裔数据,可以更好地确定邀请目标,进一步加强族裔多样化的招聘。未来的研究应评估用于促进从临床试验中代表性不足的群体中招募的方法。
NHS-Galleri trial: Enriched enrolment approaches and sociodemographic characteristics of enrolled participants.
Background/aims: Certain sociodemographic groups are routinely underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting generalisability. Here, we describe the extent to which enriched enrolment approaches yielded a diverse trial population enriched for older age in a randomised controlled trial of a blood-based multi-cancer early detection test (NCT05611632).
Methods: Participants aged 50-77 years were recruited from eight Cancer Alliance regions in England. Most were identified and invited from centralised health service lists; a dynamic invitation algorithm was used to target those in older and more deprived groups. Others were invited by their general practice surgery (GP-based Participant Identification Centres in selected regions); towards the end of recruitment, specifically Asian and Black individuals were invited via this route, as part of a concerted effort to encourage enrolment among these individuals. Some participants self-referred, often following engagement activities involving community organisations. Enrolment took place in 11 mobile clinics at 151 locations that were generally more socioeconomically deprived and ethnically diverse than the England average. We reduced logistical barriers to trial participation by offering language interpretation and translation and disabled access measures. After enrolment, we examined (1) sociodemographic distribution of participants versus England and Cancer Alliance populations, and (2) number needed to invite (NNI; the number of invitations sent to enrol one participant) by age, sex, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and ethnicity, and GP surgery-level bowel screening participation.
Results: Approximately 1.5 million individuals were invited and 142,924 enrolled (98% via centralised health service lists/invitation algorithm) in 10.5 months. The enrolled population was older and more deprived than the England population aged 50-77 years (73.3% vs 56.8% aged 60-77 years; 42.3% vs 35.3% in IMD groups 1-2). Ethnic diversity was lower in the trial than the England population (1.4% vs 2.8% Black; 3.3% vs 5.3% Asian). NNI was highest in Black (32.8), Asian (28.2) and most-deprived (21.5) groups, and lowest in mixed ethnicity (8.1) and least-deprived (4.6) groups.
Conclusions: Enrolment approaches used in the NHS-Galleri trial enabled recruitment of an older, socioeconomically diverse participant population relatively rapidly. Compared with the England and Cancer Alliance populations, the enrolled population was enriched for those in older age and more deprived groups. Better ethnicity data availability in central health service records could enable better invitation targeting to further enhance ethnically diverse recruitment. Future research should evaluate approaches used to facilitate recruitment from underrepresented groups in clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.