[医生在患者使用替代和补充药物方面的职责]。

Rodrigo Salinas R, Carlos Echeverría B, Alberto Rojas O, Paulina Taboada R, Hernán Borja R, Anamaría Arriagada U, María A Rodríguez S, Gonzalo Ruiz-Esquide S, María Alejandra Florenzano V
{"title":"[医生在患者使用替代和补充药物方面的职责]。","authors":"Rodrigo Salinas R, Carlos Echeverría B, Alberto Rojas O, Paulina Taboada R, Hernán Borja R, Anamaría Arriagada U, María A Rodríguez S, Gonzalo Ruiz-Esquide S, María Alejandra Florenzano V","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the prevailing medical pluralism of contemporary society, alternative and complementary medicine occupy a relevant place, comprising a heterogeneous group of practices with different values depending on tradition and social acceptance. Their scarce regulation and growing use, facilitated by promotion through social networks and distrust of the dominant biomedical model, have generated interest among medical organizations and health authorities in their use and consequences. Appreciations vary from outright rejection to interest in its adoption by public health systems as part of their services. Its growing use, however, contrasts with an incipient development of the scientific evidence supporting its use and, consequently, a scarce representation of its curricular teaching in our medical schools. The use of CAM by patients cannot be ignored in the therapeutic encounter. Physicians must be prepared to discuss their possible benefits and risks with their patients and to make recommendations in accordance with the principles of medical professionalism: the good of the patient must take precedence over other interests, taking into account the scarce scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety, the imperfect regulation to which they are subject and the lack of pharmacovigilance on their effects. The patient's autonomy over his or her health care, considerations regarding the use of scarce health care resources, and the due compassion and empathy owed to the patient as a suffering being cannot be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 8","pages":"901-908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Salinas R, Carlos Echeverría B, Alberto Rojas O, Paulina Taboada R, Hernán Borja R, Anamaría Arriagada U, María A Rodríguez S, Gonzalo Ruiz-Esquide S, María Alejandra Florenzano V\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the prevailing medical pluralism of contemporary society, alternative and complementary medicine occupy a relevant place, comprising a heterogeneous group of practices with different values depending on tradition and social acceptance. Their scarce regulation and growing use, facilitated by promotion through social networks and distrust of the dominant biomedical model, have generated interest among medical organizations and health authorities in their use and consequences. Appreciations vary from outright rejection to interest in its adoption by public health systems as part of their services. Its growing use, however, contrasts with an incipient development of the scientific evidence supporting its use and, consequently, a scarce representation of its curricular teaching in our medical schools. The use of CAM by patients cannot be ignored in the therapeutic encounter. Physicians must be prepared to discuss their possible benefits and risks with their patients and to make recommendations in accordance with the principles of medical professionalism: the good of the patient must take precedence over other interests, taking into account the scarce scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety, the imperfect regulation to which they are subject and the lack of pharmacovigilance on their effects. The patient's autonomy over his or her health care, considerations regarding the use of scarce health care resources, and the due compassion and empathy owed to the patient as a suffering being cannot be ignored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 8\",\"pages\":\"901-908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当代社会普遍存在的医学多元化中,替代和补充医学占据了相关的地位,由具有不同价值观的不同传统和社会接受度的异质实践组成。由于社会网络的推广和对占主导地位的生物医学模式的不信任,它们缺乏监管和越来越多的使用,引起了医疗组织和卫生当局对它们的使用和后果的兴趣。褒贬不一,有的完全拒绝,有的对公共卫生系统将其作为其服务的一部分加以采用感兴趣。然而,它的使用越来越多,与支持其使用的科学证据的初步发展形成鲜明对比,因此,它在我们医学院的课程教学中很少有代表性。患者在治疗过程中不能忽视CAM的使用。医生必须准备好与患者讨论这些药物可能带来的益处和风险,并根据医疗专业原则提出建议:患者的利益必须优先于其他利益,同时考虑到这些药物的有效性和安全性缺乏科学证据,它们所受的监管不完善,以及对其影响缺乏药物警惕性。病人对他或她的医疗保健的自主权,关于使用稀缺的医疗保健资源的考虑,以及作为一个受苦的人对病人应有的同情和同情是不能忽视的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].

In the prevailing medical pluralism of contemporary society, alternative and complementary medicine occupy a relevant place, comprising a heterogeneous group of practices with different values depending on tradition and social acceptance. Their scarce regulation and growing use, facilitated by promotion through social networks and distrust of the dominant biomedical model, have generated interest among medical organizations and health authorities in their use and consequences. Appreciations vary from outright rejection to interest in its adoption by public health systems as part of their services. Its growing use, however, contrasts with an incipient development of the scientific evidence supporting its use and, consequently, a scarce representation of its curricular teaching in our medical schools. The use of CAM by patients cannot be ignored in the therapeutic encounter. Physicians must be prepared to discuss their possible benefits and risks with their patients and to make recommendations in accordance with the principles of medical professionalism: the good of the patient must take precedence over other interests, taking into account the scarce scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety, the imperfect regulation to which they are subject and the lack of pharmacovigilance on their effects. The patient's autonomy over his or her health care, considerations regarding the use of scarce health care resources, and the due compassion and empathy owed to the patient as a suffering being cannot be ignored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信