IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olivia Hall, Ajmol Ali, Carol Wham
{"title":"New Zealand Early Learning Service Menus Do Not Meet Health New Zealand Guidelines for Providing Healthy Menus and Reducing Food-Related Choking in Children.","authors":"Olivia Hall, Ajmol Ali, Carol Wham","doi":"10.1002/hpja.953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess alignment of food and drinks served to New Zealand (NZ) children in early learning services (ELS) with the Health NZ (formerly known as Ministry of Health) Healthy Food and Drink (HFD) and Reducing Food Related Choking (choking) guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Menus (271) collected remotely from 148 ELS from November 2020-March 2021 were analysed for their nutritional quality based on a 'traffic light' classification of 'green' (most nutritious), 'amber' (moderately nutritious) and 'red' (least nutritious) based on the guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2.6% of menus met the guidance, and alignment was greater for menus for over 2-year-olds (over-2s) than under 2-year-olds (under-2s; p < 0.01). One-fifth (18.5%) of menus met the choking guidance. Services with a Healthy Heart Award (HHA) from the Heart Foundation provided more 'green' items to over-2s (p = 0.039) and under-2s (p = 0.01), and less 'red' items to over-2s (p = 0.04). Providing more green menu items was inversely correlated with providing less high choking risk foods (p < 0.01). Menu scores did not vary by service location, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation or type (services operating independently versus those part of an education group chain).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alignment with Health NZ nutritional guidance is low, particularly in ELS caring for very young children (under-2s). Service characteristics, except for HHA status, are a poor predictor of nutritional quality of menus at ELS.</p><p><strong>So what: </strong>Greater uptake of the HHA scheme could assist ELS to provide healthier food and drinks. Early learning services need further support from the public health sector to implement national nutritional guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 1","pages":"e953"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估向新西兰(NZ)早期教育服务机构(ELS)的儿童提供的食品和饮料是否符合新西兰卫生部(前身为卫生部)的健康食品和饮料(HFD)以及减少与食物有关的窒息(窒息)指南:从 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月,我们从 148 个幼儿学习中心远程收集了菜单(271 份),并根据指南,按照 "红绿灯 "将其分为 "绿色"(最有营养)、"黄色"(中等营养)和 "红色"(最无营养),对其营养质量进行了分析:结果:总体而言,2.6% 的菜单符合指南要求,2 岁以上儿童(over-2s)的菜单比 2 岁以下儿童(under-2s)的菜单更符合指南要求:与新西兰卫生部营养指南的一致性较低,尤其是在照顾两岁以下幼儿的幼儿服务中。服务特征(HHA 状态除外)对幼儿学前班菜单的营养质量预测较差。早期教育服务需要公共卫生部门的进一步支持,以落实国家营养指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Zealand Early Learning Service Menus Do Not Meet Health New Zealand Guidelines for Providing Healthy Menus and Reducing Food-Related Choking in Children.

Objective: To assess alignment of food and drinks served to New Zealand (NZ) children in early learning services (ELS) with the Health NZ (formerly known as Ministry of Health) Healthy Food and Drink (HFD) and Reducing Food Related Choking (choking) guidance.

Methods: Menus (271) collected remotely from 148 ELS from November 2020-March 2021 were analysed for their nutritional quality based on a 'traffic light' classification of 'green' (most nutritious), 'amber' (moderately nutritious) and 'red' (least nutritious) based on the guidance.

Results: Overall, 2.6% of menus met the guidance, and alignment was greater for menus for over 2-year-olds (over-2s) than under 2-year-olds (under-2s; p < 0.01). One-fifth (18.5%) of menus met the choking guidance. Services with a Healthy Heart Award (HHA) from the Heart Foundation provided more 'green' items to over-2s (p = 0.039) and under-2s (p = 0.01), and less 'red' items to over-2s (p = 0.04). Providing more green menu items was inversely correlated with providing less high choking risk foods (p < 0.01). Menu scores did not vary by service location, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation or type (services operating independently versus those part of an education group chain).

Conclusions: Alignment with Health NZ nutritional guidance is low, particularly in ELS caring for very young children (under-2s). Service characteristics, except for HHA status, are a poor predictor of nutritional quality of menus at ELS.

So what: Greater uptake of the HHA scheme could assist ELS to provide healthier food and drinks. Early learning services need further support from the public health sector to implement national nutritional guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信