关节镜治疗舟状骨不连前后的清创术和松质骨移植。

IF 1.6
Alexandre Quemener-Tanguy, Rémy Vigié, Axel Koelhy, Safire Ballet, Jean-Baptiste De Villeneuve Bargemon, Michel Levadoux
{"title":"关节镜治疗舟状骨不连前后的清创术和松质骨移植。","authors":"Alexandre Quemener-Tanguy, Rémy Vigié, Axel Koelhy, Safire Ballet, Jean-Baptiste De Villeneuve Bargemon, Michel Levadoux","doi":"10.1177/17531934241312333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the outcomes of two groups of patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting. In group 1, K-wires were introduced beforehand and in group 2 after debridement and packing bone grafts in the nonunion site. Our hypothesis was that the percentage of unions would be higher in group 2. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre comparative study of two consecutive series of patients. Seventeen patients in group 1 were operated between 2011 and 2015 and 25 patients in group 2 between 2015 and 2022. At 3 months, there was already a significant difference in consolidation, with three fractures united in group 1 and 21 in group 2. At 6 months, 10 patients (59%) united in group 1 and 24 (96%) in group 2. Debridement of the nonunion site without K-wires in place may allow a more thorough debridement and extensive filling of the defect with bone graft. If an arthroscopic technique is used for scaphoid nonunion, we do not recommend prior fixation with K-wires.<b>Level of evidence:</b> III.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"914-921"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion with debridement and cancellous bone grafting before or after K-wire fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Quemener-Tanguy, Rémy Vigié, Axel Koelhy, Safire Ballet, Jean-Baptiste De Villeneuve Bargemon, Michel Levadoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934241312333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compared the outcomes of two groups of patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting. In group 1, K-wires were introduced beforehand and in group 2 after debridement and packing bone grafts in the nonunion site. Our hypothesis was that the percentage of unions would be higher in group 2. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre comparative study of two consecutive series of patients. Seventeen patients in group 1 were operated between 2011 and 2015 and 25 patients in group 2 between 2015 and 2022. At 3 months, there was already a significant difference in consolidation, with three fractures united in group 1 and 21 in group 2. At 6 months, 10 patients (59%) united in group 1 and 24 (96%) in group 2. Debridement of the nonunion site without K-wires in place may allow a more thorough debridement and extensive filling of the defect with bone graft. If an arthroscopic technique is used for scaphoid nonunion, we do not recommend prior fixation with K-wires.<b>Level of evidence:</b> III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"914-921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241312333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241312333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们比较了两组经关节镜下松质骨移植治疗舟状骨不连的结果。第1组事先引入k针,第2组在骨不连部位清创和填充骨移植物后引入k针。我们的假设是,第2组的结合率会更高。我们对两个连续系列的患者进行了回顾性、单中心比较研究。组1于2011 - 2015年手术17例,组2于2015 - 2022年手术25例。3个月时,两组患者的巩固情况已有显著差异,1组有3处骨折愈合,2组有21处骨折愈合。6个月时,1组有10例(59%)患者痊愈,2组有24例(96%)患者痊愈。不使用克氏针对骨不连部位进行清创,可以实现更彻底的清创和骨移植物对缺损的广泛填充。如果使用关节镜技术治疗舟状骨不连,我们不建议事先用k针固定。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion with debridement and cancellous bone grafting before or after K-wire fixation.

We compared the outcomes of two groups of patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting. In group 1, K-wires were introduced beforehand and in group 2 after debridement and packing bone grafts in the nonunion site. Our hypothesis was that the percentage of unions would be higher in group 2. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre comparative study of two consecutive series of patients. Seventeen patients in group 1 were operated between 2011 and 2015 and 25 patients in group 2 between 2015 and 2022. At 3 months, there was already a significant difference in consolidation, with three fractures united in group 1 and 21 in group 2. At 6 months, 10 patients (59%) united in group 1 and 24 (96%) in group 2. Debridement of the nonunion site without K-wires in place may allow a more thorough debridement and extensive filling of the defect with bone graft. If an arthroscopic technique is used for scaphoid nonunion, we do not recommend prior fixation with K-wires.Level of evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信