人神经干细胞治疗创伤性脑损伤——临床前研究的系统综述。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0544
Sarah L Schantz, Kylee J Duberstein, Erin E Kaiser, Franklin D West
{"title":"人神经干细胞治疗创伤性脑损伤——临床前研究的系统综述。","authors":"Sarah L Schantz, Kylee J Duberstein, Erin E Kaiser, Franklin D West","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human neural stem cells (hNSCs) possess significant therapeutic potential for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of global death and disability. Recent pre-clinical studies have shown that hNSCs reduce tissue damage and promote functional recovery through neuroprotective and regenerative signaling and cell replacement. Yet the overall efficacy of hNSCs for TBI indications remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate hNSC interventions compared with controls in pre-clinical TBI models. Through this process, variations in hNSC administration protocols were consolidated, and key knowledge gaps were identified. Meta-analysis was applied to primary outcomes of lesion volume, Morris Water Maze (MWM) performance, modified Neurological Severity Scores (mNSS), and the rotarod task. Narrative review of secondary outcomes included hNSC survival and differentiation, endogenous neuron survival, axonal injury, and inflammation. Overall, hNSC intervention reduced lesion volume, enhanced MWM performance, and led to trending decreases in acute and chronic neurological deficits at acute and chronic time points. These results suggest hNSCs demonstrate clear efficacy in pre-clinical TBI models. However, further studies are needed to address key questions regarding optimal hNSC administration (e.g., dosing, treatment window) and underlying mechanisms of action prior to progressing to human clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"668-688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review of Pre-Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Schantz, Kylee J Duberstein, Erin E Kaiser, Franklin D West\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neu.2024.0544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human neural stem cells (hNSCs) possess significant therapeutic potential for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of global death and disability. Recent pre-clinical studies have shown that hNSCs reduce tissue damage and promote functional recovery through neuroprotective and regenerative signaling and cell replacement. Yet the overall efficacy of hNSCs for TBI indications remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate hNSC interventions compared with controls in pre-clinical TBI models. Through this process, variations in hNSC administration protocols were consolidated, and key knowledge gaps were identified. Meta-analysis was applied to primary outcomes of lesion volume, Morris Water Maze (MWM) performance, modified Neurological Severity Scores (mNSS), and the rotarod task. Narrative review of secondary outcomes included hNSC survival and differentiation, endogenous neuron survival, axonal injury, and inflammation. Overall, hNSC intervention reduced lesion volume, enhanced MWM performance, and led to trending decreases in acute and chronic neurological deficits at acute and chronic time points. These results suggest hNSCs demonstrate clear efficacy in pre-clinical TBI models. However, further studies are needed to address key questions regarding optimal hNSC administration (e.g., dosing, treatment window) and underlying mechanisms of action prior to progressing to human clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"668-688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0544\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类神经干细胞(hNSCs)在治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)方面具有巨大的治疗潜力,创伤性脑损伤是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。最近的临床前研究表明,hNSCs通过神经保护和再生信号传导以及细胞替代来减少组织损伤并促进功能恢复。然而,hNSCs对TBI适应症的总体疗效尚不清楚。因此,本系统综述旨在比较临床前TBI模型中hNSC干预与对照组的效果。通过这一过程,hNSC管理协议的差异得到了巩固,并确定了关键的知识差距。对病变体积、Morris水迷宫(MWM)表现、改良神经严重程度评分(mNSS)和旋转棒任务的主要结局进行meta分析。次要结局的叙述性回顾包括hNSC存活和分化、内源性神经元存活、轴突损伤和炎症。总体而言,hNSC干预减少了病变体积,增强了MWM性能,并导致急性和慢性时间点急慢性神经功能缺损呈下降趋势。这些结果表明,hNSCs在临床前TBI模型中表现出明显的疗效。然而,在进行人体临床试验之前,需要进一步的研究来解决有关hNSC最佳给药(例如,剂量,治疗窗口)和潜在作用机制的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review of Pre-Clinical Studies.

Human neural stem cells (hNSCs) possess significant therapeutic potential for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of global death and disability. Recent pre-clinical studies have shown that hNSCs reduce tissue damage and promote functional recovery through neuroprotective and regenerative signaling and cell replacement. Yet the overall efficacy of hNSCs for TBI indications remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate hNSC interventions compared with controls in pre-clinical TBI models. Through this process, variations in hNSC administration protocols were consolidated, and key knowledge gaps were identified. Meta-analysis was applied to primary outcomes of lesion volume, Morris Water Maze (MWM) performance, modified Neurological Severity Scores (mNSS), and the rotarod task. Narrative review of secondary outcomes included hNSC survival and differentiation, endogenous neuron survival, axonal injury, and inflammation. Overall, hNSC intervention reduced lesion volume, enhanced MWM performance, and led to trending decreases in acute and chronic neurological deficits at acute and chronic time points. These results suggest hNSCs demonstrate clear efficacy in pre-clinical TBI models. However, further studies are needed to address key questions regarding optimal hNSC administration (e.g., dosing, treatment window) and underlying mechanisms of action prior to progressing to human clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信