作为创业场所的协作空间:企业家的场所创造经验和实践的现象学研究

IF 4.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Pascal Dey, Amadou Lô, Pauline Fatien
{"title":"作为创业场所的协作空间:企业家的场所创造经验和实践的现象学研究","authors":"Pascal Dey, Amadou Lô, Pauline Fatien","doi":"10.1177/00187267241310701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurship scholars have become increasingly interested in new collaborative spaces—such as incubators, makerspaces, and coworking spaces—that support entrepreneurial ventures. However, limited attention has been paid to entrepreneurs’ embodied capacity to transform these collaborative spaces into places for entrepreneuring. In response, we propose a phenomenological perspective to advance theorizing on how entrepreneurs “do place” by experiencing and shaping the meaning, affective content, and materiality of their workplace in specific ways. Based on a longitudinal qualitative study of a coworking space in Paris, we identify three regimes of entrepreneur’s place-making: (a) collectively negotiating place-meaning, (b) manipulating place as a site of practical use, and (c) place-based identity forming. Our contribution is threefold. First, drawing on a diverse literature on phenomenology, and recent practice-based research, we argue that a dual focus on the embodied experiences and practices of entrepreneurs enables a more granular understanding of how collaborative spaces are enacted as “places-of-entrepreneuring.” Second, we show how “places-of-entrepreneuring” emerge from the skillful interweaving of different regimes of place-making. Third, we recommend that owners of collaborative spaces proactively promote place-making “by design” by encouraging entrepreneurs to become active producers, rather than passive users, of their work environments.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative spaces as places-of-entrepreneuring: A phenomenological investigation of entrepreneurs’ place-making experiences and practices\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Dey, Amadou Lô, Pauline Fatien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187267241310701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entrepreneurship scholars have become increasingly interested in new collaborative spaces—such as incubators, makerspaces, and coworking spaces—that support entrepreneurial ventures. However, limited attention has been paid to entrepreneurs’ embodied capacity to transform these collaborative spaces into places for entrepreneuring. In response, we propose a phenomenological perspective to advance theorizing on how entrepreneurs “do place” by experiencing and shaping the meaning, affective content, and materiality of their workplace in specific ways. Based on a longitudinal qualitative study of a coworking space in Paris, we identify three regimes of entrepreneur’s place-making: (a) collectively negotiating place-meaning, (b) manipulating place as a site of practical use, and (c) place-based identity forming. Our contribution is threefold. First, drawing on a diverse literature on phenomenology, and recent practice-based research, we argue that a dual focus on the embodied experiences and practices of entrepreneurs enables a more granular understanding of how collaborative spaces are enacted as “places-of-entrepreneuring.” Second, we show how “places-of-entrepreneuring” emerge from the skillful interweaving of different regimes of place-making. Third, we recommend that owners of collaborative spaces proactively promote place-making “by design” by encouraging entrepreneurs to become active producers, rather than passive users, of their work environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Relations\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241310701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241310701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创业学者对支持创业的新型协作空间越来越感兴趣,例如孵化器、创客空间和联合办公空间。然而,企业家将这些协作空间转化为创业场所的具体能力却受到了有限的关注。作为回应,我们提出了一种现象学的观点,以推进企业家如何通过体验和塑造其工作场所的意义、情感内容和物质性来“做位置”的理论化。基于对巴黎一个共享办公空间的纵向定性研究,我们确定了企业家的三种场所制造机制:(a)集体协商场所意义,(b)将场所作为实际使用的场所,以及(c)基于场所的身份形成。我们的贡献是三重的。首先,借鉴现象学方面的多种文献,以及最近基于实践的研究,我们认为,对企业家的具体化经验和实践的双重关注,可以更细致地理解协作空间是如何被制定为“创业场所”的。其次,我们展示了“创业场所”是如何从不同场所创造制度的巧妙交织中产生的。第三,我们建议协作空间的所有者通过鼓励企业家成为其工作环境的主动生产者,而不是被动用户,积极推动“通过设计”创造场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative spaces as places-of-entrepreneuring: A phenomenological investigation of entrepreneurs’ place-making experiences and practices
Entrepreneurship scholars have become increasingly interested in new collaborative spaces—such as incubators, makerspaces, and coworking spaces—that support entrepreneurial ventures. However, limited attention has been paid to entrepreneurs’ embodied capacity to transform these collaborative spaces into places for entrepreneuring. In response, we propose a phenomenological perspective to advance theorizing on how entrepreneurs “do place” by experiencing and shaping the meaning, affective content, and materiality of their workplace in specific ways. Based on a longitudinal qualitative study of a coworking space in Paris, we identify three regimes of entrepreneur’s place-making: (a) collectively negotiating place-meaning, (b) manipulating place as a site of practical use, and (c) place-based identity forming. Our contribution is threefold. First, drawing on a diverse literature on phenomenology, and recent practice-based research, we argue that a dual focus on the embodied experiences and practices of entrepreneurs enables a more granular understanding of how collaborative spaces are enacted as “places-of-entrepreneuring.” Second, we show how “places-of-entrepreneuring” emerge from the skillful interweaving of different regimes of place-making. Third, we recommend that owners of collaborative spaces proactively promote place-making “by design” by encouraging entrepreneurs to become active producers, rather than passive users, of their work environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Relations
Human Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信