利用PATH研究调查电子烟使用中种族差异的危险因素。

IF 0.9 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Stats Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.3390/stats7030037
Amy Liu, Kennedy Dorsey, Almetra Granger, Ty-Runet Bryant, Tung-Sung Tseng, Michael Celestin, Qingzhao Yu
{"title":"利用PATH研究调查电子烟使用中种族差异的危险因素。","authors":"Amy Liu, Kennedy Dorsey, Almetra Granger, Ty-Runet Bryant, Tung-Sung Tseng, Michael Celestin, Qingzhao Yu","doi":"10.3390/stats7030037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has identified differences in e-cigarette use and socioeconomic factors between different racial groups However, there is little research examining specific risk factors contributing to the racial differences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to identify racial disparities in e-cigarette use and to determine risk factors that help explain these differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of e-smoking across our risk factor variables. Next, we used multiple logistic regression to check the risk effects by adjusting all covariates. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether identified factors showed evidence of influencing the association between race and e-cigarette use. All analyses were performed in R or SAS. The R package mma was used for the mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations, our potential risk factors collectively explain 17.5% of the racial difference, former cigarette smoking explains 7.6%, receiving e-cigarette advertising 2.6%, and perception of e-cigarette harm explains 27.8% of the racial difference. Between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, former cigarette smoking, receiving e-cigarette advertising, and perception of e-cigarette harm explain 5.2%, 1.8%, and 6.8% of the racial difference, respectively. E-cigarette use is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic White population compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, which may be explained by former cigarette smoking, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, and e-cigarette harm perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that racial differences in e-cigarette use may be reduced by increasing knowledge of the dangers associated with e-cigarette use and reducing exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. This comprehensive analysis of risk factors can be used to significantly guide smoking cessation efforts and address potential health burden disparities arising from differences in e-cigarette usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93142,"journal":{"name":"Stats","volume":"7 3","pages":"613-626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Liu, Kennedy Dorsey, Almetra Granger, Ty-Runet Bryant, Tung-Sung Tseng, Michael Celestin, Qingzhao Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/stats7030037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has identified differences in e-cigarette use and socioeconomic factors between different racial groups However, there is little research examining specific risk factors contributing to the racial differences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to identify racial disparities in e-cigarette use and to determine risk factors that help explain these differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of e-smoking across our risk factor variables. Next, we used multiple logistic regression to check the risk effects by adjusting all covariates. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether identified factors showed evidence of influencing the association between race and e-cigarette use. All analyses were performed in R or SAS. The R package mma was used for the mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations, our potential risk factors collectively explain 17.5% of the racial difference, former cigarette smoking explains 7.6%, receiving e-cigarette advertising 2.6%, and perception of e-cigarette harm explains 27.8% of the racial difference. Between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, former cigarette smoking, receiving e-cigarette advertising, and perception of e-cigarette harm explain 5.2%, 1.8%, and 6.8% of the racial difference, respectively. E-cigarette use is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic White population compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, which may be explained by former cigarette smoking, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, and e-cigarette harm perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that racial differences in e-cigarette use may be reduced by increasing knowledge of the dangers associated with e-cigarette use and reducing exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. This comprehensive analysis of risk factors can be used to significantly guide smoking cessation efforts and address potential health burden disparities arising from differences in e-cigarette usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stats\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"613-626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stats\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stats","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:之前的研究已经确定了不同种族群体在电子烟使用和社会经济因素方面的差异,然而,很少有研究检查导致种族差异的具体风险因素。目的:本研究旨在确定电子烟使用中的种族差异,并确定有助于解释这些差异的风险因素。方法:我们使用成人烟草与健康评估(PATH)研究的第5期(2018-2019)。首先,我们对电子烟的风险因素变量进行了描述性统计。接下来,我们通过调整所有协变量,使用多元逻辑回归来检验风险效应。最后,我们进行了中介分析,以确定确定的因素是否显示影响种族和电子烟使用之间关联的证据。所有分析均在R或SAS中进行。采用R包mma进行中介分析。结果:在西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人人群中,我们的潜在风险因素共同解释了17.5%的种族差异,以前吸烟解释了7.6%,接受电子烟广告解释了2.6%,对电子烟危害的认知解释了27.8%的种族差异。在非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人人群中,曾经吸烟、接受电子烟广告和对电子烟危害的认知分别解释了5.2%、1.8%和6.8%的种族差异。与非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人群相比,非西班牙裔白人中电子烟的使用最为普遍,这可能是由于以前吸烟、接触电子烟广告以及对电子烟危害的认识。结论:这些发现表明,通过增加对电子烟使用相关危险的认识和减少对电子烟广告的接触,可以减少电子烟使用的种族差异。这种对风险因素的全面分析可用于显著指导戒烟工作,并解决因电子烟使用差异而产生的潜在健康负担差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study.

Background: Previous research has identified differences in e-cigarette use and socioeconomic factors between different racial groups However, there is little research examining specific risk factors contributing to the racial differences.

Objective: This study sought to identify racial disparities in e-cigarette use and to determine risk factors that help explain these differences.

Methods: We used Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of e-smoking across our risk factor variables. Next, we used multiple logistic regression to check the risk effects by adjusting all covariates. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether identified factors showed evidence of influencing the association between race and e-cigarette use. All analyses were performed in R or SAS. The R package mma was used for the mediation analysis.

Results: Between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations, our potential risk factors collectively explain 17.5% of the racial difference, former cigarette smoking explains 7.6%, receiving e-cigarette advertising 2.6%, and perception of e-cigarette harm explains 27.8% of the racial difference. Between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, former cigarette smoking, receiving e-cigarette advertising, and perception of e-cigarette harm explain 5.2%, 1.8%, and 6.8% of the racial difference, respectively. E-cigarette use is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic White population compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, which may be explained by former cigarette smoking, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, and e-cigarette harm perception.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that racial differences in e-cigarette use may be reduced by increasing knowledge of the dangers associated with e-cigarette use and reducing exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. This comprehensive analysis of risk factors can be used to significantly guide smoking cessation efforts and address potential health burden disparities arising from differences in e-cigarette usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信