在马拉维和赞比亚,CXR-CAD软件与放射科医生在评估Sars - CoV-2感染的个体中识别COVID-19的比较

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000535
Sam Linsen, Aurélie Kamoun, Andrews Gunda, Tamara Mwenifumbo, Chancy Chavula, Lindiwe Nchimunya, Yucheng Tsai, Namwaka Mulenga, Godfrey Kadewele, Eunice Nahache Kajombo, Veronica Sunkutu, Jane Shawa, Rigveda Kadam, Matthew Arentz
{"title":"在马拉维和赞比亚,CXR-CAD软件与放射科医生在评估Sars - CoV-2感染的个体中识别COVID-19的比较","authors":"Sam Linsen, Aurélie Kamoun, Andrews Gunda, Tamara Mwenifumbo, Chancy Chavula, Lindiwe Nchimunya, Yucheng Tsai, Namwaka Mulenga, Godfrey Kadewele, Eunice Nahache Kajombo, Veronica Sunkutu, Jane Shawa, Rigveda Kadam, Matthew Arentz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI based software, including computer aided detection software for chest radiographs (CXR-CAD), was developed during the pandemic to improve COVID-19 case finding and triage. In high burden TB countries, the use of highly portable CXR and computer aided detection software has been adopted more broadly to improve the screening and triage of individuals for TB, but there is little evidence in these settings regarding COVID-19 CAD performance. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cross-over study evaluating CXRs from individuals at risk for COVID-19. We evaluated performance of CAD software and radiologists in comparison to COVID-19 laboratory results in 671 individuals evaluated for COVID-19 at sites in Zambia and Malawi between January 2021 and June 2022. All CXRs were interpreted by an expert radiologist and two commercially available COVID-19 CXR-CAD software. Radiologists interpreted CXRs for COVID-19 with a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI: 69%- 76%) and specificity of 49% (95% CI: 40%-58%). One CAD software (CAD2) showed performance in diagnosing COVID-19 that was comparable to that of radiologists, (AUC-ROC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75)), while a second (CAD1) showed inferior performance (AUC-ROC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63)). Agreement between CAD software and radiologists was moderate for diagnosing COVID-19, and agreement was very good in differentiating normal and abnormal CXRs in this high prevalent population. The study highlights the potential of CXR-CAD as a tool to support effective triage of individuals in Malawi and Zambia during the pandemic, particularly for distinguishing normal from abnormal CXRs. These findings suggest that while current AI-based diagnostics like CXR-CAD show promise, their effectiveness varies significantly. In order to better prepare for future pandemics, there is a need for representative training data to optimize performance in key populations, and ongoing data collection to maintain diagnostic accuracy, especially as new disease strains emerge.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 1","pages":"e0000535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of CXR-CAD software to radiologists in identifying COVID-19 in individuals evaluated for Sars CoV-2 infection in Malawi and Zambia.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Linsen, Aurélie Kamoun, Andrews Gunda, Tamara Mwenifumbo, Chancy Chavula, Lindiwe Nchimunya, Yucheng Tsai, Namwaka Mulenga, Godfrey Kadewele, Eunice Nahache Kajombo, Veronica Sunkutu, Jane Shawa, Rigveda Kadam, Matthew Arentz\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AI based software, including computer aided detection software for chest radiographs (CXR-CAD), was developed during the pandemic to improve COVID-19 case finding and triage. In high burden TB countries, the use of highly portable CXR and computer aided detection software has been adopted more broadly to improve the screening and triage of individuals for TB, but there is little evidence in these settings regarding COVID-19 CAD performance. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cross-over study evaluating CXRs from individuals at risk for COVID-19. We evaluated performance of CAD software and radiologists in comparison to COVID-19 laboratory results in 671 individuals evaluated for COVID-19 at sites in Zambia and Malawi between January 2021 and June 2022. All CXRs were interpreted by an expert radiologist and two commercially available COVID-19 CXR-CAD software. Radiologists interpreted CXRs for COVID-19 with a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI: 69%- 76%) and specificity of 49% (95% CI: 40%-58%). One CAD software (CAD2) showed performance in diagnosing COVID-19 that was comparable to that of radiologists, (AUC-ROC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75)), while a second (CAD1) showed inferior performance (AUC-ROC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63)). Agreement between CAD software and radiologists was moderate for diagnosing COVID-19, and agreement was very good in differentiating normal and abnormal CXRs in this high prevalent population. The study highlights the potential of CXR-CAD as a tool to support effective triage of individuals in Malawi and Zambia during the pandemic, particularly for distinguishing normal from abnormal CXRs. These findings suggest that while current AI-based diagnostics like CXR-CAD show promise, their effectiveness varies significantly. In order to better prepare for future pandemics, there is a need for representative training data to optimize performance in key populations, and ongoing data collection to maintain diagnostic accuracy, especially as new disease strains emerge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e0000535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大流行期间,开发了基于人工智能的软件,包括胸片计算机辅助检测软件(CXR-CAD),以改善COVID-19病例的发现和分类。在结核病高负担国家,高度便携式CXR和计算机辅助检测软件的使用已被更广泛地采用,以改善结核病患者的筛查和分诊,但在这些环境中,关于COVID-19 CAD性能的证据很少。我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性交叉研究,评估了COVID-19风险个体的cxr。我们将CAD软件和放射科医生的表现与2021年1月至2022年6月期间在赞比亚和马拉维接受COVID-19评估的671名个体的COVID-19实验室结果进行了比较。所有cxr均由一名放射专家和两款市售的COVID-19 CXR-CAD软件进行解释。放射科医生对COVID-19的cxr的敏感性为73% (95% CI: 69%- 76%),特异性为49% (95% CI: 40%-58%)。一款CAD软件(CAD2)在诊断COVID-19方面的表现与放射科医生相当(AUC-ROC为0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75)),而另一款CAD软件(CAD1)的表现较差(AUC-ROC为0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63))。CAD软件与放射科医师对COVID-19的诊断一致性中等,在这一高发人群中区分正常和异常cxr的一致性非常好。该研究强调了CXR-CAD作为一种工具的潜力,可在大流行期间支持对马拉维和赞比亚的个体进行有效分类,特别是用于区分正常和异常的cxr。这些发现表明,尽管目前基于人工智能的诊断(如CXR-CAD)显示出希望,但它们的有效性差异很大。为了更好地应对未来的大流行病,需要有代表性的培训数据,以优化在关键人群中的表现,并需要不断收集数据,以保持诊断的准确性,特别是在出现新的疾病菌株时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of CXR-CAD software to radiologists in identifying COVID-19 in individuals evaluated for Sars CoV-2 infection in Malawi and Zambia.

AI based software, including computer aided detection software for chest radiographs (CXR-CAD), was developed during the pandemic to improve COVID-19 case finding and triage. In high burden TB countries, the use of highly portable CXR and computer aided detection software has been adopted more broadly to improve the screening and triage of individuals for TB, but there is little evidence in these settings regarding COVID-19 CAD performance. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cross-over study evaluating CXRs from individuals at risk for COVID-19. We evaluated performance of CAD software and radiologists in comparison to COVID-19 laboratory results in 671 individuals evaluated for COVID-19 at sites in Zambia and Malawi between January 2021 and June 2022. All CXRs were interpreted by an expert radiologist and two commercially available COVID-19 CXR-CAD software. Radiologists interpreted CXRs for COVID-19 with a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI: 69%- 76%) and specificity of 49% (95% CI: 40%-58%). One CAD software (CAD2) showed performance in diagnosing COVID-19 that was comparable to that of radiologists, (AUC-ROC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75)), while a second (CAD1) showed inferior performance (AUC-ROC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63)). Agreement between CAD software and radiologists was moderate for diagnosing COVID-19, and agreement was very good in differentiating normal and abnormal CXRs in this high prevalent population. The study highlights the potential of CXR-CAD as a tool to support effective triage of individuals in Malawi and Zambia during the pandemic, particularly for distinguishing normal from abnormal CXRs. These findings suggest that while current AI-based diagnostics like CXR-CAD show promise, their effectiveness varies significantly. In order to better prepare for future pandemics, there is a need for representative training data to optimize performance in key populations, and ongoing data collection to maintain diagnostic accuracy, especially as new disease strains emerge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信