远程心理健康采用对联邦合格健康中心心理健康服务利用的影响。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Khyathi Gadag, Kanika Arora, Whitney E Zahnd
{"title":"远程心理健康采用对联邦合格健康中心心理健康服务利用的影响。","authors":"Khyathi Gadag, Kanika Arora, Whitney E Zahnd","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241307417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental health issues disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, where access to prevention and treatment is limited. Implementing telemental health services (TMHS) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) could improve accessibility to mental healthcare. This study assessed the effect of TMHS on mental health services utilization in FQHCs, comparing centers with and without TMHS and examined differences in TMHS effect between FQHCs that adopted TMHS before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized FQHC-level data from Uniform Data Systems annual performance reports (<i>N</i> = 9540 FQHC-year) and county-level demographic, health status, and provider characteristic data from 2016 to 2022. A two-way fixed effects model was applied to examine the effect of TMHS on mental health visit rates, supplemented by the Sun and Abraham difference-in-differences estimator. The analysis included both pre-COVID and during-COVID TMHS adopters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FQHCs offering TMHS showed 1.04 times increase in overall mental health visit rates compared to those without TMHS. Centers serving higher proportions of Medicaid-insured (1.07 times) and low-income (below 200% FPL; 1.05 times) populations showed even higher visit rates. During-COVID TMHS adopters showed a significant increase (1.05 times), particularly in urban areas, whereas rural adopters did not see significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FQHCs offering TMHS showed increased mental health visit rates, especially among low-income and Medicaid-insured populations. FQHCs that adopted TMHS during the pandemic experienced a marked rise in mental health visits, but rural-urban disparities persist, highlighting the ongoing challenges in expanding access to mental healthcare in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241307417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of telemental health adoption on mental health services utilization in federally qualified health centers.\",\"authors\":\"Khyathi Gadag, Kanika Arora, Whitney E Zahnd\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X241307417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental health issues disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, where access to prevention and treatment is limited. Implementing telemental health services (TMHS) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) could improve accessibility to mental healthcare. This study assessed the effect of TMHS on mental health services utilization in FQHCs, comparing centers with and without TMHS and examined differences in TMHS effect between FQHCs that adopted TMHS before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized FQHC-level data from Uniform Data Systems annual performance reports (<i>N</i> = 9540 FQHC-year) and county-level demographic, health status, and provider characteristic data from 2016 to 2022. A two-way fixed effects model was applied to examine the effect of TMHS on mental health visit rates, supplemented by the Sun and Abraham difference-in-differences estimator. The analysis included both pre-COVID and during-COVID TMHS adopters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FQHCs offering TMHS showed 1.04 times increase in overall mental health visit rates compared to those without TMHS. Centers serving higher proportions of Medicaid-insured (1.07 times) and low-income (below 200% FPL; 1.05 times) populations showed even higher visit rates. During-COVID TMHS adopters showed a significant increase (1.05 times), particularly in urban areas, whereas rural adopters did not see significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FQHCs offering TMHS showed increased mental health visit rates, especially among low-income and Medicaid-insured populations. FQHCs that adopted TMHS during the pandemic experienced a marked rise in mental health visits, but rural-urban disparities persist, highlighting the ongoing challenges in expanding access to mental healthcare in rural settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1357633X241307417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241307417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241307417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:心理健康问题对农村和低收入人口的影响尤为严重,在这些地区获得预防和治疗的机会有限。在联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)实施远程精神卫生服务(TMHS)可以改善获得精神卫生保健的机会。本研究评估了TMHS对FQHCs心理健康服务利用的影响,比较了有TMHS和没有TMHS的中心,并检查了在大流行之前和期间采用TMHS的FQHCs之间TMHS效果的差异。方法:研究利用统一数据系统年度绩效报告(N = 9540 FQHC-year)中的fqhc级数据以及2016 - 2022年县级人口统计、健康状况和提供者特征数据。采用双向固定效应模型检验TMHS对心理健康就诊率的影响,并辅以Sun和Abraham差异中差估计量。该分析包括covid前和covid期间的TMHS采用者。结果:提供TMHS的家庭健康中心的总体心理健康出诊率比不提供TMHS的家庭健康中心高1.04倍。医疗保险参保比例较高(1.07倍)和低收入(低于200% FPL)的中心;1.05倍)的人口的到访率更高。在covid期间,TMHS采用者显着增加(1.05倍),特别是在城市地区,而农村采用者没有显着变化。结论:提供TMHS的FQHCs的心理健康访问率有所增加,特别是在低收入人群和医疗保险参保人群中。在大流行期间采用TMHS的家庭卫生保健中心的精神卫生就诊人数明显增加,但城乡差距仍然存在,突出了在农村环境中扩大获得精神卫生保健的机会方面面临的持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of telemental health adoption on mental health services utilization in federally qualified health centers.

Introduction: Mental health issues disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, where access to prevention and treatment is limited. Implementing telemental health services (TMHS) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) could improve accessibility to mental healthcare. This study assessed the effect of TMHS on mental health services utilization in FQHCs, comparing centers with and without TMHS and examined differences in TMHS effect between FQHCs that adopted TMHS before and during the pandemic.

Methods: The study utilized FQHC-level data from Uniform Data Systems annual performance reports (N = 9540 FQHC-year) and county-level demographic, health status, and provider characteristic data from 2016 to 2022. A two-way fixed effects model was applied to examine the effect of TMHS on mental health visit rates, supplemented by the Sun and Abraham difference-in-differences estimator. The analysis included both pre-COVID and during-COVID TMHS adopters.

Results: FQHCs offering TMHS showed 1.04 times increase in overall mental health visit rates compared to those without TMHS. Centers serving higher proportions of Medicaid-insured (1.07 times) and low-income (below 200% FPL; 1.05 times) populations showed even higher visit rates. During-COVID TMHS adopters showed a significant increase (1.05 times), particularly in urban areas, whereas rural adopters did not see significant changes.

Conclusion: FQHCs offering TMHS showed increased mental health visit rates, especially among low-income and Medicaid-insured populations. FQHCs that adopted TMHS during the pandemic experienced a marked rise in mental health visits, but rural-urban disparities persist, highlighting the ongoing challenges in expanding access to mental healthcare in rural settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信