基线值对全膝关节置换术后住院康复结果的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Martin Missmann, Michael J Fischer
{"title":"基线值对全膝关节置换术后住院康复结果的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Martin Missmann, Michael J Fischer","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.40443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between groups with different baseline scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with knee osteoarthritis who have previously undergone unilateral TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients participated in 3-week inpatient rehabilitation following TKA and were assessed for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Furthermore, mobility scores for the range of motion (ROM) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test were recorded at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation. Patients were divided into quartile groups based on their initial examination scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>329 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population consisted mostly of female patients (63.8% vs 36.2%) with a mean age of 68.25 (SD 9.24) years. The personalized 21-day in rehabilitation programme was safe for all patients and had no dropouts. Patients with better PROMs scores at T1 did not have the same potential for improvement in PROMs but showed effective improvement in mobility (η² = 0.103 for changes in the WOMAC vs η²=0.502 for changes in the TUG test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the baseline scores, all patients presented significant improvements in both subjective and objective measures. Age and baseline PROMs or mobility scores did not have a significant effect on score development.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm40443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of baseline values on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Missmann, Michael J Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm.v57.40443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between groups with different baseline scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with knee osteoarthritis who have previously undergone unilateral TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients participated in 3-week inpatient rehabilitation following TKA and were assessed for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Furthermore, mobility scores for the range of motion (ROM) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test were recorded at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation. Patients were divided into quartile groups based on their initial examination scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>329 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population consisted mostly of female patients (63.8% vs 36.2%) with a mean age of 68.25 (SD 9.24) years. The personalized 21-day in rehabilitation programme was safe for all patients and had no dropouts. Patients with better PROMs scores at T1 did not have the same potential for improvement in PROMs but showed effective improvement in mobility (η² = 0.103 for changes in the WOMAC vs η²=0.502 for changes in the TUG test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the baseline scores, all patients presented significant improvements in both subjective and objective measures. Age and baseline PROMs or mobility scores did not have a significant effect on score development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"jrm40443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.40443\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.40443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不同基线评分组全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后住院康复效果。设计:回顾性观察性研究。研究对象:既往行单侧TKA的膝关节骨性关节炎患者。方法:患者在TKA后参加为期3周的住院康复,并对患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)进行评估,包括数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、欧洲生活质量5维度5水平版本(EQ-5D-5L)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)。此外,在康复开始和结束时记录运动范围(ROM)和定时向上和向前(TUG)测试的活动能力评分。根据患者的初始检查分数将患者分为四分位数组。结果:329例患者入组研究。研究人群以女性患者为主(63.8% vs 36.2%),平均年龄68.25岁(SD 9.24)。个性化的21天康复计划对所有患者都是安全的,没有退出。T1时PROMs评分较高的患者在PROMs方面没有相同的改善潜力,但在活动能力方面表现出有效的改善(WOMAC测试变化的η²= 0.103 vs TUG测试变化的η²=0.502)。结论:无论基线评分如何,所有患者在主观和客观测量方面均有显着改善。年龄和基线PROMs或活动得分对得分发展没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of baseline values on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study.

Objective: To compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between groups with different baseline scores.

Design: A retrospective observational study.

Subjects: Patients with knee osteoarthritis who have previously undergone unilateral TKA.

Methods: Patients participated in 3-week inpatient rehabilitation following TKA and were assessed for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Furthermore, mobility scores for the range of motion (ROM) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test were recorded at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation. Patients were divided into quartile groups based on their initial examination scores.

Results: 329 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population consisted mostly of female patients (63.8% vs 36.2%) with a mean age of 68.25 (SD 9.24) years. The personalized 21-day in rehabilitation programme was safe for all patients and had no dropouts. Patients with better PROMs scores at T1 did not have the same potential for improvement in PROMs but showed effective improvement in mobility (η² = 0.103 for changes in the WOMAC vs η²=0.502 for changes in the TUG test).

Conclusion: Regardless of the baseline scores, all patients presented significant improvements in both subjective and objective measures. Age and baseline PROMs or mobility scores did not have a significant effect on score development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信