用一种确定总可及工作空间的新方法评估上肢骨折骨融合术后的上肢功能能力。

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Felipe de Souza Serenza, Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato, Fernando Vieira, Kevin James McQuade, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira
{"title":"用一种确定总可及工作空间的新方法评估上肢骨折骨融合术后的上肢功能能力。","authors":"Felipe de Souza Serenza, Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato, Fernando Vieira, Kevin James McQuade, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/17585732241313363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess reachable workspace (RWS) in patients post-osteosynthesis of shoulder, elbow, or wrist fractures and explore correlations with self-reported function and kinesiophobia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational case-control study compared patients with fractures to a control group, utilizing questionnaires and 3D kinematic data.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample included 66 individuals who had undergone osteosynthesis: 21 with shoulder fractures, 10 with elbow fractures, and 22 with wrist fractures. A control group of 23 participants without upper limb pathologies was also established. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and recent surgery; exclusions were previous upper limb surgeries, cervical pathologies, systemic diseases or nerve injuries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>RWS, the three-dimensional volume the hand can reach, was measured with participants standing. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), and physical disability and pain were measured using the DASH questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture groups exhibited significant RWS reductions (62-85%) compared to the control group, with no significant differences among the fracture types. RWS showed a high correlation with TKS (R = 0.77) and a moderate correlation with DASH (R = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RWS is a promising biomechanical parameter for assessing upper limb function post-fracture, aiding in refining rehabilitation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241313363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of upper extremity functional capacity in following osteosynthesis for upper limb fractures using a novel method for determining total reachable workspace.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe de Souza Serenza, Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato, Fernando Vieira, Kevin James McQuade, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732241313363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess reachable workspace (RWS) in patients post-osteosynthesis of shoulder, elbow, or wrist fractures and explore correlations with self-reported function and kinesiophobia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational case-control study compared patients with fractures to a control group, utilizing questionnaires and 3D kinematic data.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample included 66 individuals who had undergone osteosynthesis: 21 with shoulder fractures, 10 with elbow fractures, and 22 with wrist fractures. A control group of 23 participants without upper limb pathologies was also established. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and recent surgery; exclusions were previous upper limb surgeries, cervical pathologies, systemic diseases or nerve injuries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>RWS, the three-dimensional volume the hand can reach, was measured with participants standing. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), and physical disability and pain were measured using the DASH questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture groups exhibited significant RWS reductions (62-85%) compared to the control group, with no significant differences among the fracture types. RWS showed a high correlation with TKS (R = 0.77) and a moderate correlation with DASH (R = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RWS is a promising biomechanical parameter for assessing upper limb function post-fracture, aiding in refining rehabilitation protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732241313363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241313363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241313363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估肩关节、肘关节或腕关节骨折患者的可达工作空间(RWS),并探讨其与自我报告的功能和运动恐惧症的相关性。设计:一项观察性病例对照研究,利用问卷调查和3D运动学数据,将骨折患者与对照组进行比较。参与者:样本包括66例接受过骨融合术的患者:21例肩骨折,10例肘部骨折,22例腕部骨折。另设23名无上肢病变的对照组。纳入标准:年龄18-80岁,近期手术;排除既往上肢手术、颈椎病变、全身性疾病或神经损伤。主要结果测量:RWS,手可以到达的三维体积,是在参与者站立时测量的。运动恐惧症采用坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TKS)进行评估,身体残疾和疼痛采用DASH问卷和数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)进行测量。结果:与对照组相比,骨折组RWS明显降低(62-85%),骨折类型之间无显著差异。RWS与TKS呈高度相关(R = 0.77),与DASH呈中度相关(R = 0.52)。结论:RWS是评估骨折后上肢功能的一个很有前途的生物力学参数,有助于完善康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of upper extremity functional capacity in following osteosynthesis for upper limb fractures using a novel method for determining total reachable workspace.

Objective: This study aimed to assess reachable workspace (RWS) in patients post-osteosynthesis of shoulder, elbow, or wrist fractures and explore correlations with self-reported function and kinesiophobia.

Design: An observational case-control study compared patients with fractures to a control group, utilizing questionnaires and 3D kinematic data.

Participants: The sample included 66 individuals who had undergone osteosynthesis: 21 with shoulder fractures, 10 with elbow fractures, and 22 with wrist fractures. A control group of 23 participants without upper limb pathologies was also established. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and recent surgery; exclusions were previous upper limb surgeries, cervical pathologies, systemic diseases or nerve injuries.

Main outcome measure: RWS, the three-dimensional volume the hand can reach, was measured with participants standing. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), and physical disability and pain were measured using the DASH questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Results: Fracture groups exhibited significant RWS reductions (62-85%) compared to the control group, with no significant differences among the fracture types. RWS showed a high correlation with TKS (R = 0.77) and a moderate correlation with DASH (R = 0.52).

Conclusion: RWS is a promising biomechanical parameter for assessing upper limb function post-fracture, aiding in refining rehabilitation protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信