低收入和中低收入国家供款医疗保险计划的政策选择,以推动实现全民健康覆盖。

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2024-12-18 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905
Agnes Gatome-Munyua, Joseph Kutzin, Cheryl Cashin
{"title":"低收入和中低收入国家供款医疗保险计划的政策选择,以推动实现全民健康覆盖。","authors":"Agnes Gatome-Munyua, Joseph Kutzin, Cheryl Cashin","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The promise of contributory health insurance to generate additional, self-sustaining funding for the health sector has not been achieved in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Instead, contributory health insurance has been found to exacerbate inequities in access to health care because entitlements are linked to contributions. For these countries with contributory health insurance schemes, with separate institutional arrangements for revenue collection and purchasing, that operate alongside budget-funded and other health financing schemes, it is usually not politically or technically feasible to reverse or eliminate these arrangements even when they fragment the health system. We propose three complementary policy options for countries in this difficult position to enable progress towards UHC: (1) Merge existing schemes into a single scheme (or fewer schemes) to consolidate pooling and purchasing functions. (2) Build on what they have by: reducing reliance on contributions by increasing budget transfers; using existing revenue collection mechanisms to allow the insurance agency to focus on the purchasing function; and strengthening insurance agencies' operational capacity for purchasing. (3) Reframe the insurance agency's role within the overall health system, rather than treating it as a distinct system by: unifying data collection and analysis for all patient visits irrespective of scheme membership, and universalizing core benefits across the population. We urge countries to review the patchwork of schemes and avoid worsening fragmentation that compromises health system performance. Countries can then create a strategy to expand coverage more equitably in a sequential manner, while consolidating institutional capacity for purchasing and unifying data systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"10 3","pages":"2449905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Options for Contributory Health Insurance Schemes in Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries to Enable Progress Towards Universal Health Coverage.\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Gatome-Munyua, Joseph Kutzin, Cheryl Cashin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The promise of contributory health insurance to generate additional, self-sustaining funding for the health sector has not been achieved in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Instead, contributory health insurance has been found to exacerbate inequities in access to health care because entitlements are linked to contributions. For these countries with contributory health insurance schemes, with separate institutional arrangements for revenue collection and purchasing, that operate alongside budget-funded and other health financing schemes, it is usually not politically or technically feasible to reverse or eliminate these arrangements even when they fragment the health system. We propose three complementary policy options for countries in this difficult position to enable progress towards UHC: (1) Merge existing schemes into a single scheme (or fewer schemes) to consolidate pooling and purchasing functions. (2) Build on what they have by: reducing reliance on contributions by increasing budget transfers; using existing revenue collection mechanisms to allow the insurance agency to focus on the purchasing function; and strengthening insurance agencies' operational capacity for purchasing. (3) Reframe the insurance agency's role within the overall health system, rather than treating it as a distinct system by: unifying data collection and analysis for all patient visits irrespective of scheme membership, and universalizing core benefits across the population. We urge countries to review the patchwork of schemes and avoid worsening fragmentation that compromises health system performance. Countries can then create a strategy to expand coverage more equitably in a sequential manner, while consolidating institutional capacity for purchasing and unifying data systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"2449905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多低收入和中低收入国家,缴费健康保险为卫生部门产生额外的、自我维持的资金的承诺尚未实现。相反,缴费健康保险加剧了获得保健服务方面的不平等,因为应享权利与缴款挂钩。对于那些设有缴费式健康保险计划的国家,在收入征收和采购方面有单独的机构安排,并与预算供资计划和其他卫生筹资计划一起运作,即使这些安排使卫生系统四分五裂,通常在政治上或技术上也不可能扭转或取消这些安排。我们为处于这一困难处境的国家提出了三个互补的政策选择,以推动在全民健康覆盖方面取得进展:(1)将现有计划合并为一个计划(或更少的计划),以巩固统筹和采购功能。(2)在现有基础上:通过增加预算转移来减少对捐款的依赖;利用现有的收入征收机制,让保险代理机构专注于采购职能;加强保险机构采购业务能力建设。(3)重新构建保险机构在整个卫生系统中的角色,而不是将其视为一个独特的系统:统一所有患者就诊的数据收集和分析,而不考虑计划成员,并在整个人群中普及核心福利。我们敦促各国审查零零碎碎的计划,避免导致有损卫生系统绩效的碎片化恶化。然后,各国可以制定一项战略,以循序渐进的方式更公平地扩大覆盖范围,同时巩固采购和统一数据系统的机构能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy Options for Contributory Health Insurance Schemes in Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries to Enable Progress Towards Universal Health Coverage.

The promise of contributory health insurance to generate additional, self-sustaining funding for the health sector has not been achieved in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Instead, contributory health insurance has been found to exacerbate inequities in access to health care because entitlements are linked to contributions. For these countries with contributory health insurance schemes, with separate institutional arrangements for revenue collection and purchasing, that operate alongside budget-funded and other health financing schemes, it is usually not politically or technically feasible to reverse or eliminate these arrangements even when they fragment the health system. We propose three complementary policy options for countries in this difficult position to enable progress towards UHC: (1) Merge existing schemes into a single scheme (or fewer schemes) to consolidate pooling and purchasing functions. (2) Build on what they have by: reducing reliance on contributions by increasing budget transfers; using existing revenue collection mechanisms to allow the insurance agency to focus on the purchasing function; and strengthening insurance agencies' operational capacity for purchasing. (3) Reframe the insurance agency's role within the overall health system, rather than treating it as a distinct system by: unifying data collection and analysis for all patient visits irrespective of scheme membership, and universalizing core benefits across the population. We urge countries to review the patchwork of schemes and avoid worsening fragmentation that compromises health system performance. Countries can then create a strategy to expand coverage more equitably in a sequential manner, while consolidating institutional capacity for purchasing and unifying data systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信