肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者对通气支持的选择影响阿片类药物的使用。

IF 2.8
Chiharu Matsuda, Yuki Nakayama, Michiko Haraguchi, Ryo Morishima, Yumi Itagaki, Kota Bokuda, Hideki Kimura, Kazushi Takahashi, Toshio Shimizu
{"title":"肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者对通气支持的选择影响阿片类药物的使用。","authors":"Chiharu Matsuda, Yuki Nakayama, Michiko Haraguchi, Ryo Morishima, Yumi Itagaki, Kota Bokuda, Hideki Kimura, Kazushi Takahashi, Toshio Shimizu","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2453463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of different ventilatory support options on opioid use among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 889 consecutive patients with ALS and enrolled 399 eligible patients. All patients were followed until death or tracheostomy. Clinical characteristics of patients and the timing of initial opioid administration were evaluated. Patients were categorized into four subgroups: (1) 160 patients who never used a ventilator, (2) 120 patients who used only noninvasive ventilation (NIV), (3) 61 patients who transitioned from NIV to tracheostomy and invasive ventilation (TIV), and (4) 58 patients who underwent TIV without prior NIV. We compared the prevalence of opioid use across these groups and assessed its relationship with ventilatory support options using multivariate logistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients (32.6%) used opioids. The number of patients who used opioids in each group was as follows: 55 (34.4%) in Group 1, 69 (57.5%) in Group 2, 5 (8.2%) in Group 3, and 1 (1.7%) in Group 4 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that, compared to Group 1, the use of NIV only was positively associated with opioid use (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In contrast, transitioning from NIV to TIV (Group 3) and using TIV only (Group 4) were negatively associated with opioid use (<i>p</i> = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of ventilatory support significantly influences opioid use in patients with ALS. Patients who opted against TIV required opioids to relieve distress more commonly than those who chose TIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"409-416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' choices regarding ventilatory support affect opioid use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chiharu Matsuda, Yuki Nakayama, Michiko Haraguchi, Ryo Morishima, Yumi Itagaki, Kota Bokuda, Hideki Kimura, Kazushi Takahashi, Toshio Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678421.2025.2453463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of different ventilatory support options on opioid use among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 889 consecutive patients with ALS and enrolled 399 eligible patients. All patients were followed until death or tracheostomy. Clinical characteristics of patients and the timing of initial opioid administration were evaluated. Patients were categorized into four subgroups: (1) 160 patients who never used a ventilator, (2) 120 patients who used only noninvasive ventilation (NIV), (3) 61 patients who transitioned from NIV to tracheostomy and invasive ventilation (TIV), and (4) 58 patients who underwent TIV without prior NIV. We compared the prevalence of opioid use across these groups and assessed its relationship with ventilatory support options using multivariate logistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients (32.6%) used opioids. The number of patients who used opioids in each group was as follows: 55 (34.4%) in Group 1, 69 (57.5%) in Group 2, 5 (8.2%) in Group 3, and 1 (1.7%) in Group 4 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that, compared to Group 1, the use of NIV only was positively associated with opioid use (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In contrast, transitioning from NIV to TIV (Group 3) and using TIV only (Group 4) were negatively associated with opioid use (<i>p</i> = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of ventilatory support significantly influences opioid use in patients with ALS. Patients who opted against TIV required opioids to relieve distress more commonly than those who chose TIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"409-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2453463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2453463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同通气支持方案对肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者阿片类药物使用的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了889例连续ALS患者,并纳入了399例符合条件的患者。所有患者均随访至死亡或气管切开术。评估患者的临床特征和初始阿片类药物给药时间。患者被分为四个亚组:(1)从未使用呼吸机的患者160例,(2)仅使用无创通气(NIV)的患者120例,(3)从无创通气过渡到气管造口术和有创通气(TIV)的患者61例,(4)未使用无创通气的患者58例。我们比较了这些组中阿片类药物使用的流行程度,并使用多变量逻辑分析评估了其与通气支持选择的关系。结果:共130例患者使用阿片类药物,占32.6%。各组使用阿片类药物的患者数量分别为:1组55例(34.4%),2组69例(57.5%),3组5例(8.2%),4组1例(1.7%)(p p = 0.002)。相比之下,从NIV过渡到TIV(第3组)和仅使用TIV(第4组)与阿片类药物使用呈负相关(p分别= 0.0001和0.001)。结论:呼吸支持的选择显著影响ALS患者阿片类药物的使用。选择反对TIV的患者比选择TIV的患者更需要阿片类药物来缓解痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' choices regarding ventilatory support affect opioid use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Objective: To investigate the impact of different ventilatory support options on opioid use among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 889 consecutive patients with ALS and enrolled 399 eligible patients. All patients were followed until death or tracheostomy. Clinical characteristics of patients and the timing of initial opioid administration were evaluated. Patients were categorized into four subgroups: (1) 160 patients who never used a ventilator, (2) 120 patients who used only noninvasive ventilation (NIV), (3) 61 patients who transitioned from NIV to tracheostomy and invasive ventilation (TIV), and (4) 58 patients who underwent TIV without prior NIV. We compared the prevalence of opioid use across these groups and assessed its relationship with ventilatory support options using multivariate logistic analysis.

Results: A total of 130 patients (32.6%) used opioids. The number of patients who used opioids in each group was as follows: 55 (34.4%) in Group 1, 69 (57.5%) in Group 2, 5 (8.2%) in Group 3, and 1 (1.7%) in Group 4 (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that, compared to Group 1, the use of NIV only was positively associated with opioid use (p = 0.002). In contrast, transitioning from NIV to TIV (Group 3) and using TIV only (Group 4) were negatively associated with opioid use (p = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: The choice of ventilatory support significantly influences opioid use in patients with ALS. Patients who opted against TIV required opioids to relieve distress more commonly than those who chose TIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信