腹腔镜胆囊切除术中吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影的益处、问题和最佳给药时机。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310
Shinichi Kinami, Kaori Maruyama, Yuta Sannomiya, Hitoshi Saito, Hiroyuki Takamura
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影的益处、问题和最佳给药时机。","authors":"Shinichi Kinami, Kaori Maruyama, Yuta Sannomiya, Hitoshi Saito, Hiroyuki Takamura","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The advantages of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography have been emphasized, but its disadvantages remain unclear. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this modality, particularly the optimal timing of administration of ICG fluorescence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were gathered from a single institution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>69 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We administered intravenous ICG injections at three different times: preoperatively (5 mg/body weight (BW), 15 min before incision), morning of the surgery (12.5 mg/BW 4 hours before surgery), and on the day before the surgery (25 mg/BW, 20 hours before surgery). The PINPOINT or SPY-PHI (Stryker) systems were used for fluorescence imaging.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The course of the common bile and cystic ducts was identified using fluorescence imaging. The visualization quality was graded on a three-point scale: good, poor, and unobservable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 patients for preoperative administration, 14 on the morning of the surgery, and 38 on the day before the surgery. The cystic duct could not be visualized in five patients because of insufficient dose, impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, after endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and severe cholecystitis. The observations were poor in 14 patients. The reasons for the poor visualization were cholecystitis after ERBD and a low signal-to-noise ratio due to intense light emission from the liver, which is a characteristic of preoperative administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cystic and common bile ducts were well visualized using ICG fluorescence cholangiography, except in patients with impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, ERBD, and severe cholecystitis. The most effective timing for ICG administration was the day before the surgery. ICG fluorescence cholangiography is not a substitute for intraoperative cholangiography or preoperative biliary imaging; however, it would be desirable in all patients who undergo cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>jRCTs041180006.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits, problems, and optimal timing of administration of indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Kinami, Kaori Maruyama, Yuta Sannomiya, Hitoshi Saito, Hiroyuki Takamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The advantages of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography have been emphasized, but its disadvantages remain unclear. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this modality, particularly the optimal timing of administration of ICG fluorescence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were gathered from a single institution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>69 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We administered intravenous ICG injections at three different times: preoperatively (5 mg/body weight (BW), 15 min before incision), morning of the surgery (12.5 mg/BW 4 hours before surgery), and on the day before the surgery (25 mg/BW, 20 hours before surgery). The PINPOINT or SPY-PHI (Stryker) systems were used for fluorescence imaging.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The course of the common bile and cystic ducts was identified using fluorescence imaging. The visualization quality was graded on a three-point scale: good, poor, and unobservable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 patients for preoperative administration, 14 on the morning of the surgery, and 38 on the day before the surgery. The cystic duct could not be visualized in five patients because of insufficient dose, impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, after endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and severe cholecystitis. The observations were poor in 14 patients. The reasons for the poor visualization were cholecystitis after ERBD and a low signal-to-noise ratio due to intense light emission from the liver, which is a characteristic of preoperative administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cystic and common bile ducts were well visualized using ICG fluorescence cholangiography, except in patients with impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, ERBD, and severe cholecystitis. The most effective timing for ICG administration was the day before the surgery. ICG fluorescence cholangiography is not a substitute for intraoperative cholangiography or preoperative biliary imaging; however, it would be desirable in all patients who undergo cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>jRCTs041180006.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"e000310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光胆管造影的优点已被强调,但其缺点尚不清楚。本研究调查了这种方式的优点和缺点,特别是给药ICG荧光的最佳时机。设计:对前瞻性收集的患者资料进行回顾性分析。环境:数据从单一机构收集。参与者:纳入69例胆囊切除术患者。干预措施:我们在三个不同的时间静脉注射ICG:术前(5 mg/体重(BW),切口前15分钟),术中早晨(12.5 mg/体重,术前4小时),术前1天(25 mg/体重,术前20小时)。使用PINPOINT或SPY-PHI (Stryker)系统进行荧光成像。主要观察指标:用荧光显像确定胆总管和胆囊管的病程。可视化质量按3个分数表进行分级:好、差和不可观察。结果:术前给药17例,术中上午给药14例,前一天给药38例。5例患者因剂量不足、阻生胆结石、胆囊管结石、内镜下逆行胆道引流术(ERBD)及严重胆囊炎等原因无法看到胆囊管。14例观察结果较差。可见性差的原因包括:ERBD术后胆囊炎,以及术前给药时肝脏发出的强光导致的低信噪比。结论:除阻生胆结石、胆囊管结石、ERBD和严重胆囊炎患者外,ICG荧光胆管造影能很好地显示胆囊管和胆总管。ICG最有效的给药时间是手术前一天。ICG荧光胆管造影不能替代术中胆管造影或术前胆道造影;然而,这对所有接受胆囊切除术的患者都是可取的。试验注册号:jRCTs041180006。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits, problems, and optimal timing of administration of indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Objectives: The advantages of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography have been emphasized, but its disadvantages remain unclear. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this modality, particularly the optimal timing of administration of ICG fluorescence.

Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient data.

Setting: Data were gathered from a single institution.

Participants: 69 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were included.

Interventions: We administered intravenous ICG injections at three different times: preoperatively (5 mg/body weight (BW), 15 min before incision), morning of the surgery (12.5 mg/BW 4 hours before surgery), and on the day before the surgery (25 mg/BW, 20 hours before surgery). The PINPOINT or SPY-PHI (Stryker) systems were used for fluorescence imaging.

Main outcome measures: The course of the common bile and cystic ducts was identified using fluorescence imaging. The visualization quality was graded on a three-point scale: good, poor, and unobservable.

Results: There were 17 patients for preoperative administration, 14 on the morning of the surgery, and 38 on the day before the surgery. The cystic duct could not be visualized in five patients because of insufficient dose, impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, after endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and severe cholecystitis. The observations were poor in 14 patients. The reasons for the poor visualization were cholecystitis after ERBD and a low signal-to-noise ratio due to intense light emission from the liver, which is a characteristic of preoperative administration.

Conclusion: The cystic and common bile ducts were well visualized using ICG fluorescence cholangiography, except in patients with impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, ERBD, and severe cholecystitis. The most effective timing for ICG administration was the day before the surgery. ICG fluorescence cholangiography is not a substitute for intraoperative cholangiography or preoperative biliary imaging; however, it would be desirable in all patients who undergo cholecystectomy.

Trial registration number: jRCTs041180006.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信