常染色体显性多囊肾病的肾切除术:ERA基因与肾脏工作组的共识声明。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Paul Geertsema, Ron T Gansevoort, Mustafa Arici, Giovambattista Capasso, Emilie Cornec-Le Gall, Monica Furlano, Daniel G Fuster, Flavia Galletti, Victoria Gómez Dos Santos, Maria Vanessa Perez Gomez, Dimitrios Goumenos, Jan Halbritter, Eva Jambon, Uwe Korst, Anna M Leliveld-Kors, Mireia Musquera, Arnaldo Figueiredo, Tom Nijenhuis, Jonathon Olsburgh, Robert A Pol, John A Sayer, Dirk Stippel, Roser Torra, Roman-Ulrich Müller, Niek F Casteleijn
{"title":"常染色体显性多囊肾病的肾切除术:ERA基因与肾脏工作组的共识声明。","authors":"Paul Geertsema, Ron T Gansevoort, Mustafa Arici, Giovambattista Capasso, Emilie Cornec-Le Gall, Monica Furlano, Daniel G Fuster, Flavia Galletti, Victoria Gómez Dos Santos, Maria Vanessa Perez Gomez, Dimitrios Goumenos, Jan Halbritter, Eva Jambon, Uwe Korst, Anna M Leliveld-Kors, Mireia Musquera, Arnaldo Figueiredo, Tom Nijenhuis, Jonathon Olsburgh, Robert A Pol, John A Sayer, Dirk Stippel, Roser Torra, Roman-Ulrich Müller, Niek F Casteleijn","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A substantial number of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) undergo a nephrectomy, especially in workup for a kidney transplantation. Currently, there is no evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians about which patients should undergo nephrectomy, the optimal timing of this procedure, or the preferred surgical technique. This systematic review-based consensus statement aimed to answer important questions regarding nephrectomy in ADPKD. A literature review was performed and extended to a meta-analysis when possible. For this purpose, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to May 2024. Fifty-four publications, describing a total of 2391 procedures, were included. In addition, an exploratory questionnaire was sent to urologists, nephrologists, and transplant surgeons. These sources were used to develop practice points about indications, complications, mortality, and timing and technique of nephrectomy. In addition, data on renal embolization as a potential alternative to nephrectomy were explored and summarized. To reach consensus, practice points were defined and improved in three Delphi survey rounds by experts of the European Renal Association Working Group Genes & Kidney and the European Association of Urology Section of Transplantation Urology. A total of 23 practice points/statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Among others, it was deemed that nephrectomy can be performed successfully for various indications and is an intermediate risk procedure with acceptable mortality and minimal impact on kidney graft function when performed before, in the same session or after transplantation. The complication rate seems to increase when the procedure is performed as an emergency. During the workup for transplantation, patient complaints should be assessed routinely by questionnaires to indicate symptom burden. Deciding on the need for nephrectomy and exploring potential alternatives such as kidney embolization should be a process of shared decision-making, preferably after multidisciplinary consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a consensus statement of the ERA Genes & Kidney Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Geertsema, Ron T Gansevoort, Mustafa Arici, Giovambattista Capasso, Emilie Cornec-Le Gall, Monica Furlano, Daniel G Fuster, Flavia Galletti, Victoria Gómez Dos Santos, Maria Vanessa Perez Gomez, Dimitrios Goumenos, Jan Halbritter, Eva Jambon, Uwe Korst, Anna M Leliveld-Kors, Mireia Musquera, Arnaldo Figueiredo, Tom Nijenhuis, Jonathon Olsburgh, Robert A Pol, John A Sayer, Dirk Stippel, Roser Torra, Roman-Ulrich Müller, Niek F Casteleijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfaf019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A substantial number of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) undergo a nephrectomy, especially in workup for a kidney transplantation. Currently, there is no evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians about which patients should undergo nephrectomy, the optimal timing of this procedure, or the preferred surgical technique. This systematic review-based consensus statement aimed to answer important questions regarding nephrectomy in ADPKD. A literature review was performed and extended to a meta-analysis when possible. For this purpose, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to May 2024. Fifty-four publications, describing a total of 2391 procedures, were included. In addition, an exploratory questionnaire was sent to urologists, nephrologists, and transplant surgeons. These sources were used to develop practice points about indications, complications, mortality, and timing and technique of nephrectomy. In addition, data on renal embolization as a potential alternative to nephrectomy were explored and summarized. To reach consensus, practice points were defined and improved in three Delphi survey rounds by experts of the European Renal Association Working Group Genes & Kidney and the European Association of Urology Section of Transplantation Urology. A total of 23 practice points/statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Among others, it was deemed that nephrectomy can be performed successfully for various indications and is an intermediate risk procedure with acceptable mortality and minimal impact on kidney graft function when performed before, in the same session or after transplantation. The complication rate seems to increase when the procedure is performed as an emergency. During the workup for transplantation, patient complaints should be assessed routinely by questionnaires to indicate symptom burden. Deciding on the need for nephrectomy and exploring potential alternatives such as kidney embolization should be a process of shared decision-making, preferably after multidisciplinary consultation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1032-1054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相当数量的常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)患者接受肾切除术,特别是在肾移植的检查中。目前,尚无基于证据的算法来指导临床医生哪些患者应该进行肾切除术,该手术的最佳时机或首选手术技术。本系统综述为基础的共识声明旨在回答有关肾切除术在ADPKD的重要问题。我们进行了文献回顾,并在可能的情况下进行了meta分析。为此,PubMed和EMBASE检索截止到2024年5月。收录了54份出版物,共描述了2391个程序。此外,还向泌尿科医生、肾病科医生和移植外科医生发送了一份探索性问卷。这些资料被用来发展关于指征、并发症、死亡率、时机和技术的实践要点。此外,关于肾栓塞作为一种潜在的替代肾切除术的数据进行了探讨和总结。为了达成共识,欧洲肾脏协会基因与肾脏工作组和欧洲泌尿外科协会移植泌尿科的专家通过三轮德尔菲调查确定并改进了实践点。共制定了23个实践要点/陈述,达成共识。其中,人们认为肾切除术可以成功地用于各种适应症,是一种中等风险的手术,在移植前、同一期或移植后进行,死亡率可接受,对移植肾功能的影响最小。当手术作为紧急情况进行时,并发症的发生率似乎增加了。在移植检查过程中,应通过问卷对患者的抱怨进行常规评估,以表明症状负担。决定是否需要肾切除术和探索潜在的替代方案,如肾栓塞,应该是一个共同决策的过程,最好是在多学科咨询之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a consensus statement of the ERA Genes & Kidney Working Group.

A substantial number of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) undergo a nephrectomy, especially in workup for a kidney transplantation. Currently, there is no evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians about which patients should undergo nephrectomy, the optimal timing of this procedure, or the preferred surgical technique. This systematic review-based consensus statement aimed to answer important questions regarding nephrectomy in ADPKD. A literature review was performed and extended to a meta-analysis when possible. For this purpose, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to May 2024. Fifty-four publications, describing a total of 2391 procedures, were included. In addition, an exploratory questionnaire was sent to urologists, nephrologists, and transplant surgeons. These sources were used to develop practice points about indications, complications, mortality, and timing and technique of nephrectomy. In addition, data on renal embolization as a potential alternative to nephrectomy were explored and summarized. To reach consensus, practice points were defined and improved in three Delphi survey rounds by experts of the European Renal Association Working Group Genes & Kidney and the European Association of Urology Section of Transplantation Urology. A total of 23 practice points/statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Among others, it was deemed that nephrectomy can be performed successfully for various indications and is an intermediate risk procedure with acceptable mortality and minimal impact on kidney graft function when performed before, in the same session or after transplantation. The complication rate seems to increase when the procedure is performed as an emergency. During the workup for transplantation, patient complaints should be assessed routinely by questionnaires to indicate symptom burden. Deciding on the need for nephrectomy and exploring potential alternatives such as kidney embolization should be a process of shared decision-making, preferably after multidisciplinary consultation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信