高等教育中的生成式人工智能:平衡创新与诚信。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Nigel J Francis, Sue Jones, David P Smith
{"title":"高等教育中的生成式人工智能:平衡创新与诚信。","authors":"Nigel J Francis, Sue Jones, David P Smith","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI's integration into educational practices, focusing on both its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes and the significant challenges it poses to academic integrity and equity. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the implications of GenAI on assessment practices, highlighting the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide its use. Our analysis is framed within pedagogical theories, including social constructivism and competency-based learning, highlighting the importance of balancing human expertise and AI capabilities. We also address broader ethical concerns associated with GenAI, such as the risks of bias, the digital divide, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. This paper argues that while GenAI can provide substantial benefits in terms of automation and efficiency, its integration must be managed with care to avoid undermining the authenticity of student work and exacerbating existing inequalities. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for educational institutions, including developing GenAI literacy programmes, revising assessment designs to incorporate critical thinking and creativity, and establishing transparent policies that ensure fairness and accountability in GenAI use. By fostering a responsible approach to GenAI, higher education can harness its potential while safeguarding the core values of academic integrity and inclusive education.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"81 ","pages":"14048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity.\",\"authors\":\"Nigel J Francis, Sue Jones, David P Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI's integration into educational practices, focusing on both its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes and the significant challenges it poses to academic integrity and equity. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the implications of GenAI on assessment practices, highlighting the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide its use. Our analysis is framed within pedagogical theories, including social constructivism and competency-based learning, highlighting the importance of balancing human expertise and AI capabilities. We also address broader ethical concerns associated with GenAI, such as the risks of bias, the digital divide, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. This paper argues that while GenAI can provide substantial benefits in terms of automation and efficiency, its integration must be managed with care to avoid undermining the authenticity of student work and exacerbating existing inequalities. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for educational institutions, including developing GenAI literacy programmes, revising assessment designs to incorporate critical thinking and creativity, and establishing transparent policies that ensure fairness and accountability in GenAI use. By fostering a responsible approach to GenAI, higher education can harness its potential while safeguarding the core values of academic integrity and inclusive education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"14048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)正在迅速改变高等教育的格局,为个性化学习和创新评估方法提供了新的机会。本文探讨了GenAI融入教育实践的双刃剑性质,重点关注其提高学生参与度和学习成果的潜力,以及它对学术诚信和公平构成的重大挑战。通过对当前文献的全面回顾,我们研究了GenAI对评估实践的影响,强调需要强有力的伦理框架来指导其使用。我们的分析是在教学理论框架内进行的,包括社会建构主义和基于能力的学习,强调平衡人类专业知识和人工智能能力的重要性。我们还解决了与基因人工智能相关的更广泛的伦理问题,例如偏见风险、数字鸿沟以及人工智能技术对环境的影响。本文认为,虽然GenAI可以在自动化和效率方面提供实质性的好处,但必须谨慎管理其集成,以避免破坏学生工作的真实性并加剧现有的不平等。最后,我们为教育机构提出了一系列建议,包括制定GenAI扫盲计划,修改评估设计以纳入批判性思维和创造力,以及建立透明的政策以确保GenAI使用的公平性和问责制。通过培养对GenAI负责任的态度,高等教育可以发挥其潜力,同时维护学术诚信和全纳教育的核心价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education, offering novel opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment methods. This paper explores the dual-edged nature of GenAI's integration into educational practices, focusing on both its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes and the significant challenges it poses to academic integrity and equity. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the implications of GenAI on assessment practices, highlighting the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide its use. Our analysis is framed within pedagogical theories, including social constructivism and competency-based learning, highlighting the importance of balancing human expertise and AI capabilities. We also address broader ethical concerns associated with GenAI, such as the risks of bias, the digital divide, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. This paper argues that while GenAI can provide substantial benefits in terms of automation and efficiency, its integration must be managed with care to avoid undermining the authenticity of student work and exacerbating existing inequalities. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for educational institutions, including developing GenAI literacy programmes, revising assessment designs to incorporate critical thinking and creativity, and establishing transparent policies that ensure fairness and accountability in GenAI use. By fostering a responsible approach to GenAI, higher education can harness its potential while safeguarding the core values of academic integrity and inclusive education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信