视野受限环境下行人疏散动力学的虚拟实验研究

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Ruoyu Li , Yanxu Wang , Qiao Wang , Juan Chen , Jian Ma
{"title":"视野受限环境下行人疏散动力学的虚拟实验研究","authors":"Ruoyu Li ,&nbsp;Yanxu Wang ,&nbsp;Qiao Wang ,&nbsp;Juan Chen ,&nbsp;Jian Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In emergency situations, factors such as smoke and dimly-lit conditions that lead to limited visibility for pedestrians often become an important reason for preventing more efficient evacuation. Considering factors such as cost, preparation time, and especially the safety and ethical issues of the participants, it is difficult to organize evacuation experiments with limited vision in reality. Therefore, in this paper, a multi-person online virtual experiment platform, including drawing, motion, and communication modules, is developed using the high security and expandability of virtual experiment technology to conduct such investigations that are difficult to organize safely and efficiently in reality. Firstly, the validation experiments were organized to compare with the control experiments regarding route choice and motion characteristics. The results showed that the platform could reproduce not only fundamental diagram but also route choice features of the real-life evacuation experiments. Secondly, the motion characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians during evacuation with different number and location settings of exit and different visual fields with limited vision were further studied. The results show that the movement characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians with limited vision are related to social information differences due to the visual field range (VFR) and building environment factors such as the number and location of exits. With VFR increases, the pedestrian evacuation time and movement area decrease and remain stable after VFR reaches 3.0 m. The average collision number of pedestrians increases with VFR, and the curve of the number of collisions in the dual-exit scenario is “V” shaped. The wayfinding time of pedestrians decreases with the VFR increase, and the blocking time increases accordingly. As the increase of VFR, the movement consistency and the following frequency of the crowd is higher; the larger of VFR in the single-exit scenario, the higher maximum frequency value that pedestrians are more likely to engage in following behavior, while they tend to make more autonomous decisions in the dual-exit scenario.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100988"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual experimental study on pedestrian evacuation dynamics in view-limited environment\",\"authors\":\"Ruoyu Li ,&nbsp;Yanxu Wang ,&nbsp;Qiao Wang ,&nbsp;Juan Chen ,&nbsp;Jian Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In emergency situations, factors such as smoke and dimly-lit conditions that lead to limited visibility for pedestrians often become an important reason for preventing more efficient evacuation. Considering factors such as cost, preparation time, and especially the safety and ethical issues of the participants, it is difficult to organize evacuation experiments with limited vision in reality. Therefore, in this paper, a multi-person online virtual experiment platform, including drawing, motion, and communication modules, is developed using the high security and expandability of virtual experiment technology to conduct such investigations that are difficult to organize safely and efficiently in reality. Firstly, the validation experiments were organized to compare with the control experiments regarding route choice and motion characteristics. The results showed that the platform could reproduce not only fundamental diagram but also route choice features of the real-life evacuation experiments. Secondly, the motion characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians during evacuation with different number and location settings of exit and different visual fields with limited vision were further studied. The results show that the movement characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians with limited vision are related to social information differences due to the visual field range (VFR) and building environment factors such as the number and location of exits. With VFR increases, the pedestrian evacuation time and movement area decrease and remain stable after VFR reaches 3.0 m. The average collision number of pedestrians increases with VFR, and the curve of the number of collisions in the dual-exit scenario is “V” shaped. The wayfinding time of pedestrians decreases with the VFR increase, and the blocking time increases accordingly. As the increase of VFR, the movement consistency and the following frequency of the crowd is higher; the larger of VFR in the single-exit scenario, the higher maximum frequency value that pedestrians are more likely to engage in following behavior, while they tend to make more autonomous decisions in the dual-exit scenario.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000067\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在紧急情况下,烟雾和光线昏暗等因素导致行人能见度有限,往往成为阻碍更有效疏散的重要原因。考虑到成本、准备时间等因素,特别是参与者的安全和伦理问题,在现实中很难组织具有有限视觉的疏散实验。因此,本文利用虚拟实验技术的高安全性和可扩展性,开发了一个包括绘图、运动和通信模块的多人在线虚拟实验平台,来进行现实中难以安全高效组织的调查。首先,组织验证实验,在路径选择和运动特性方面与控制实验进行比较。结果表明,该平台既能再现疏散实验的基本图,又能再现疏散实验的路径选择特征。其次,进一步研究了不同出口数量和位置设置以及不同视野条件下行人在疏散过程中的运动特征和跟随行为。结果表明:视障行人的运动特征和跟随行为与视野范围(VFR)和出口数量、位置等建筑环境因素造成的社会信息差异有关。随着VFR的增大,行人疏散时间和活动面积减小,在VFR达到3.0 m后保持稳定。行人平均碰撞次数随VFR的增加而增加,双出口场景下碰撞次数曲线呈“V”型。行人寻路时间随VFR的增加而减少,阻塞时间相应增加。随着VFR的增加,人群的运动一致性和跟随频率越高;单出口场景下VFR越大,行人更倾向于跟随行为的最大频率值越高,而双出口场景下行人更倾向于自主决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual experimental study on pedestrian evacuation dynamics in view-limited environment
In emergency situations, factors such as smoke and dimly-lit conditions that lead to limited visibility for pedestrians often become an important reason for preventing more efficient evacuation. Considering factors such as cost, preparation time, and especially the safety and ethical issues of the participants, it is difficult to organize evacuation experiments with limited vision in reality. Therefore, in this paper, a multi-person online virtual experiment platform, including drawing, motion, and communication modules, is developed using the high security and expandability of virtual experiment technology to conduct such investigations that are difficult to organize safely and efficiently in reality. Firstly, the validation experiments were organized to compare with the control experiments regarding route choice and motion characteristics. The results showed that the platform could reproduce not only fundamental diagram but also route choice features of the real-life evacuation experiments. Secondly, the motion characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians during evacuation with different number and location settings of exit and different visual fields with limited vision were further studied. The results show that the movement characteristics and following behavior of pedestrians with limited vision are related to social information differences due to the visual field range (VFR) and building environment factors such as the number and location of exits. With VFR increases, the pedestrian evacuation time and movement area decrease and remain stable after VFR reaches 3.0 m. The average collision number of pedestrians increases with VFR, and the curve of the number of collisions in the dual-exit scenario is “V” shaped. The wayfinding time of pedestrians decreases with the VFR increase, and the blocking time increases accordingly. As the increase of VFR, the movement consistency and the following frequency of the crowd is higher; the larger of VFR in the single-exit scenario, the higher maximum frequency value that pedestrians are more likely to engage in following behavior, while they tend to make more autonomous decisions in the dual-exit scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信