探讨老年痴呆患者合并症的网络分析

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Samuel Quan, Barret A. Monchka, Philip D. St. John, Malcolm B. Doupe, Maxime Turgeon, Lisa M. Lix
{"title":"探讨老年痴呆患者合并症的网络分析","authors":"Samuel Quan,&nbsp;Barret A. Monchka,&nbsp;Philip D. St. John,&nbsp;Malcolm B. Doupe,&nbsp;Maxime Turgeon,&nbsp;Lisa M. Lix","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Older persons living with dementia (PLWD) often have multiple other chronic health conditions (i.e., comorbidities). Network analyses can describe complex profiles of chronic health conditions through graphical displays grounded in empirical data. Our study compared patterns of chronic health conditions among PLWD residing in and outside of long-term care (LTC) settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based administrative data, including outpatient physician claims, inpatient records, pharmaceutical records, and LTC records, for the study were from the Canadian province of Manitoba. We included PLWD, ages ≥ 67 years, with two or more other chronic health conditions, who resided in Manitoba from 2017 to 2020. A total of 138 chronic health conditions were ascertained using a modification of the open-source Clinical Classification Software. Networks defined by nodes (health conditions) and edges (associations between nodes) were stratified by residence location (in versus outside LTC). Network properties were described, including: density (ratio of number of edges to number of potential edges), and modularity (associations between and within clusters of health conditions), and the median and interquartile range (IQR) for node degree (number of associations per node).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The population comprised 19,672 PLWD, of which 17,534 (89.1%) had two or more chronic health conditions. The median number of co-occurring conditions was similar among PLWD in LTC (median: 6, IQR: 3–10) versus outside LTC (median: 7, IQR: 4–10). Network properties were similar for PLWD and multiple comorbidities residing in versus outside LTC, including node degree (median 11 vs. 12), density (0.15 vs. 0.14), and modularity (0.18 vs. 0.26).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple chronic diseases characterize PLWD residing in and outside of LTC. Using network analyses, chronic diseases among PLWD do not form easily distinguishable groups or patterns. This suggests the need for comprehensive clinical assessments, individualized approaches for disease management, and highlights the importance of person-specific care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 4","pages":"1168-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19336","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Analyses to Explore Comorbidities Among Older Adults Living With Dementia\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Quan,&nbsp;Barret A. Monchka,&nbsp;Philip D. St. John,&nbsp;Malcolm B. Doupe,&nbsp;Maxime Turgeon,&nbsp;Lisa M. Lix\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Older persons living with dementia (PLWD) often have multiple other chronic health conditions (i.e., comorbidities). Network analyses can describe complex profiles of chronic health conditions through graphical displays grounded in empirical data. Our study compared patterns of chronic health conditions among PLWD residing in and outside of long-term care (LTC) settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Population-based administrative data, including outpatient physician claims, inpatient records, pharmaceutical records, and LTC records, for the study were from the Canadian province of Manitoba. We included PLWD, ages ≥ 67 years, with two or more other chronic health conditions, who resided in Manitoba from 2017 to 2020. A total of 138 chronic health conditions were ascertained using a modification of the open-source Clinical Classification Software. Networks defined by nodes (health conditions) and edges (associations between nodes) were stratified by residence location (in versus outside LTC). Network properties were described, including: density (ratio of number of edges to number of potential edges), and modularity (associations between and within clusters of health conditions), and the median and interquartile range (IQR) for node degree (number of associations per node).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The population comprised 19,672 PLWD, of which 17,534 (89.1%) had two or more chronic health conditions. The median number of co-occurring conditions was similar among PLWD in LTC (median: 6, IQR: 3–10) versus outside LTC (median: 7, IQR: 4–10). Network properties were similar for PLWD and multiple comorbidities residing in versus outside LTC, including node degree (median 11 vs. 12), density (0.15 vs. 0.14), and modularity (0.18 vs. 0.26).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple chronic diseases characterize PLWD residing in and outside of LTC. Using network analyses, chronic diseases among PLWD do not form easily distinguishable groups or patterns. This suggests the need for comprehensive clinical assessments, individualized approaches for disease management, and highlights the importance of person-specific care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"1168-1178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19336\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年痴呆(PLWD)患者通常有多种其他慢性健康状况(即合并症)。网络分析可以通过基于经验数据的图形显示来描述慢性健康状况的复杂概况。我们的研究比较了居住在长期护理(LTC)环境和外部的PLWD的慢性健康状况模式。方法:基于人群的管理数据,包括门诊医生索赔、住院记录、药品记录和LTC记录,来自加拿大马尼托巴省。我们纳入了2017年至2020年居住在曼尼托巴省的PLWD患者,年龄≥67岁,伴有两种或两种以上其他慢性健康状况。使用开源临床分类软件的修改版确定了138例慢性健康状况。由节点(健康状况)和边缘(节点之间的关联)定义的网络按居住地(在LTC内或在LTC外)分层。描述了网络属性,包括:密度(边数与潜在边数的比率)、模块化(健康状况集群之间和内部的关联),以及节点度的中位数和四分位数范围(每个节点的关联数)。结果:共有19672名PLWD患者,其中17534人(89.1%)患有两种或两种以上的慢性疾病。LTC内PLWD共发生疾病的中位数(中位数:6,IQR: 3-10)与LTC外PLWD(中位数:7,IQR: 4-10)相似。PLWD和LTC内外的多种合并症的网络特性相似,包括节点度(中位数11 vs. 12)、密度(0.15 vs. 0.14)和模块化(0.18 vs. 0.26)。结论:在LTC内和LTC外存在多种慢性疾病是PLWD的特征。使用网络分析,慢性疾病在PLWD中不形成容易区分的群体或模式。这表明需要全面的临床评估,个性化的疾病管理方法,并强调了个人护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Network Analyses to Explore Comorbidities Among Older Adults Living With Dementia

Network Analyses to Explore Comorbidities Among Older Adults Living With Dementia

Background

Older persons living with dementia (PLWD) often have multiple other chronic health conditions (i.e., comorbidities). Network analyses can describe complex profiles of chronic health conditions through graphical displays grounded in empirical data. Our study compared patterns of chronic health conditions among PLWD residing in and outside of long-term care (LTC) settings.

Methods

Population-based administrative data, including outpatient physician claims, inpatient records, pharmaceutical records, and LTC records, for the study were from the Canadian province of Manitoba. We included PLWD, ages ≥ 67 years, with two or more other chronic health conditions, who resided in Manitoba from 2017 to 2020. A total of 138 chronic health conditions were ascertained using a modification of the open-source Clinical Classification Software. Networks defined by nodes (health conditions) and edges (associations between nodes) were stratified by residence location (in versus outside LTC). Network properties were described, including: density (ratio of number of edges to number of potential edges), and modularity (associations between and within clusters of health conditions), and the median and interquartile range (IQR) for node degree (number of associations per node).

Results

The population comprised 19,672 PLWD, of which 17,534 (89.1%) had two or more chronic health conditions. The median number of co-occurring conditions was similar among PLWD in LTC (median: 6, IQR: 3–10) versus outside LTC (median: 7, IQR: 4–10). Network properties were similar for PLWD and multiple comorbidities residing in versus outside LTC, including node degree (median 11 vs. 12), density (0.15 vs. 0.14), and modularity (0.18 vs. 0.26).

Conclusions

Multiple chronic diseases characterize PLWD residing in and outside of LTC. Using network analyses, chronic diseases among PLWD do not form easily distinguishable groups or patterns. This suggests the need for comprehensive clinical assessments, individualized approaches for disease management, and highlights the importance of person-specific care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信