NIPT整合作为患者支付产前筛查选择-来自保加利亚遗传咨询中心的观察和挑战。

Q1 Medicine
Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova, Mariya Levkova
{"title":"NIPT整合作为患者支付产前筛查选择-来自保加利亚遗传咨询中心的观察和挑战。","authors":"Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova, Mariya Levkova","doi":"10.3390/medsci13010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test's usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test's price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. <i>Results</i>: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT-63 women for 2016-2020 versus 572 for 2021-2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. <i>Conclusions</i>: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NIPT Integration as a Patient-Paid Prenatal Screening Option-Observations and Challenges from a Bulgarian Genetic Counseling Center.\",\"authors\":\"Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova, Mariya Levkova\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci13010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test's usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test's price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. <i>Results</i>: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT-63 women for 2016-2020 versus 572 for 2021-2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. <i>Conclusions</i>: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:NIPT是一种广泛实施的产前筛查染色体疾病的方法。它的引入开创了对女性进行分析前和分析后咨询的实践。由于测试的使用是在不同的条件下建立的,比较来自不同社会经济和文化背景的数据将具有科学价值。我们的研究首次描述了保加利亚的NIPT整合情况。我们旨在评估当前需求和转诊的趋势,高危结果的频率,胎儿性别差异的病例及其影响,以及遗传咨询中普遍存在的误解。我们还解决问题和必要的一般预防和产前护理的改进。方法:回顾性分析2016年至2023年在遗传中心接受GC治疗NIPT的孕妇。我们把这段时间分成两个部分,因为测试的价格有很大的差异。共纳入635名妇女及其转诊指征、面板宽度偏好、胎儿性别和SCA。我们评估了胎儿性别差异、高危妊娠、晚期NIPT (GW 18后)以及常见的问题和误解。结果:我们观察到2016-2020年对npt -63女性的需求显著增加,而2021-2023年为572人。主要指征为正常妊娠监护(50.4%)和高龄产妇监护(31.2%)。对于晚期NIPT,最常见的适应症是来自母体血清筛查试验的高风险(33.3%)和焦虑(25%)。此外,1.1%的结果是18、21三体和x单体的高风险。我们回顾了2例胎儿性别差异(0.3%)和常见的误解在检测前GC两次以上。结论:单中心经验表明,NIPT的需求呈指数增长,特别是作为一种正常的妊娠筛查方法。在遗传咨询会议期间,向社区提供全面的教育并保证出色的护理对于促进知情决策和整体福祉至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NIPT Integration as a Patient-Paid Prenatal Screening Option-Observations and Challenges from a Bulgarian Genetic Counseling Center.

Background: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test's usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test's price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. Results: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT-63 women for 2016-2020 versus 572 for 2021-2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. Conclusions: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信