院外心脏骤停和潜在差异的种族分类:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jenny Shin, Jennifer Liu, Megin Parayil, Catherine R Counts, Christopher J Drucker, Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Sally Guan, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael R Sayre, Thomas Rea
{"title":"院外心脏骤停和潜在差异的种族分类:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jenny Shin, Jennifer Liu, Megin Parayil, Catherine R Counts, Christopher J Drucker, Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Sally Guan, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael R Sayre, Thomas Rea","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although racial disparities have been described in resuscitation, little is known about potential bias in race classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated by emergency medical services (EMS) for nontraumatic OHCA in King County, WA between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assessed agreement using κ and evaluated patterns of missingness between EMS-assessed race versus comprehensive race classification from hospital and death records. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein data elements, we analyzed the association between race and OHCA survival across different sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5909 eligible OHCA patients, the average age was 64.0 years, 35.4% were female, and 16.1% survived to hospital discharge. Based on comprehensive race classification, 68.7% were White, 12.8% Black, 12.1% Asian, 2.5% multiracial, 2.3% Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 1.6% American Indian/Alaska Native. EMS did not classify race in 43.7%. The κ coefficient between EMS and comprehensive race classification was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), though agreement varied substantially by specific race and was lowest among American Indian/Alaska Native (39.5%). Missingness in EMS records varied according to race and was greater among those classified as American Indian/Alaska Native (60.8%), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (58.8%), Asian (57.8%), or multiracial (54.1%) compared with White (40.6%) or Black (40.4%). In multivariable models using EMS-classified race, the odds ratio (OR) of survival was not significantly different for any race group compared with the White race, that is, OR. However, when using comprehensive race classification, OR of survival was significantly lower among Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97]) and among multiracial (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75]) compared with White race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult OHCA, race misclassification and missingness influenced its association with survival. Efforts should continue to evaluate best practices to classify race correctly and comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011446"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying Race in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Potential Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Shin, Jennifer Liu, Megin Parayil, Catherine R Counts, Christopher J Drucker, Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Sally Guan, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael R Sayre, Thomas Rea\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although racial disparities have been described in resuscitation, little is known about potential bias in race classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated by emergency medical services (EMS) for nontraumatic OHCA in King County, WA between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assessed agreement using κ and evaluated patterns of missingness between EMS-assessed race versus comprehensive race classification from hospital and death records. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein data elements, we analyzed the association between race and OHCA survival across different sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5909 eligible OHCA patients, the average age was 64.0 years, 35.4% were female, and 16.1% survived to hospital discharge. Based on comprehensive race classification, 68.7% were White, 12.8% Black, 12.1% Asian, 2.5% multiracial, 2.3% Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 1.6% American Indian/Alaska Native. EMS did not classify race in 43.7%. The κ coefficient between EMS and comprehensive race classification was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), though agreement varied substantially by specific race and was lowest among American Indian/Alaska Native (39.5%). Missingness in EMS records varied according to race and was greater among those classified as American Indian/Alaska Native (60.8%), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (58.8%), Asian (57.8%), or multiracial (54.1%) compared with White (40.6%) or Black (40.4%). In multivariable models using EMS-classified race, the odds ratio (OR) of survival was not significantly different for any race group compared with the White race, that is, OR. However, when using comprehensive race classification, OR of survival was significantly lower among Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97]) and among multiracial (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75]) compared with White race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult OHCA, race misclassification and missingness influenced its association with survival. Efforts should continue to evaluate best practices to classify race correctly and comprehensively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然在复苏中有种族差异的描述,但对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的种族分类的潜在偏差知之甚少。方法:我们对2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在华盛顿州金县接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗的非创伤性OHCA的成年人进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用κ来评估一致性,并评估ems评估的种族与来自医院和死亡记录的综合种族分类之间的缺失模式。使用多变量逻辑回归调整Utstein数据元素,我们分析了种族与不同来源的OHCA生存率之间的关系。结果:5909例符合条件的OHCA患者平均年龄为64.0岁,女性占35.4%,存活至出院的患者占16.1%。根据综合种族分类,68.7%为白人,12.8%为黑人,12.1%为亚洲人,2.5%为多种族,2.3%为夏威夷原住民/其他太平洋岛民,1.6%为美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民。43.7%的EMS未对种族进行分类。EMS和综合种族分类之间的κ系数为0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90),尽管特定种族的一致性差异很大,在美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民中最低(39.5%)。EMS记录中的缺失因种族而异,与白人(40.6%)或黑人(40.4%)相比,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(60.8%)、夏威夷原住民/其他太平洋岛民(58.8%)、亚洲人(57.8%)或多种族(54.1%)的缺失率更高。在使用ems分类种族的多变量模型中,任何种族组的生存优势比(odds ratio, OR)与白种人相比均无显著差异,即OR。然而,当使用综合种族分类时,与白种人相比,夏威夷原住民/其他太平洋岛民(OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97])和多种族(OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75])的生存OR明显较低。结论:在成人OHCA中,种族错误分类和缺失影响其与生存率的关系。应该继续努力评估正确和全面分类种族的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying Race in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Potential Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Although racial disparities have been described in resuscitation, little is known about potential bias in race classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated by emergency medical services (EMS) for nontraumatic OHCA in King County, WA between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assessed agreement using κ and evaluated patterns of missingness between EMS-assessed race versus comprehensive race classification from hospital and death records. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein data elements, we analyzed the association between race and OHCA survival across different sources.

Results: Among 5909 eligible OHCA patients, the average age was 64.0 years, 35.4% were female, and 16.1% survived to hospital discharge. Based on comprehensive race classification, 68.7% were White, 12.8% Black, 12.1% Asian, 2.5% multiracial, 2.3% Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 1.6% American Indian/Alaska Native. EMS did not classify race in 43.7%. The κ coefficient between EMS and comprehensive race classification was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), though agreement varied substantially by specific race and was lowest among American Indian/Alaska Native (39.5%). Missingness in EMS records varied according to race and was greater among those classified as American Indian/Alaska Native (60.8%), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (58.8%), Asian (57.8%), or multiracial (54.1%) compared with White (40.6%) or Black (40.4%). In multivariable models using EMS-classified race, the odds ratio (OR) of survival was not significantly different for any race group compared with the White race, that is, OR. However, when using comprehensive race classification, OR of survival was significantly lower among Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97]) and among multiracial (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75]) compared with White race.

Conclusions: In adult OHCA, race misclassification and missingness influenced its association with survival. Efforts should continue to evaluate best practices to classify race correctly and comprehensively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信