[在希波克拉底和就职宣誓之间:关于公共卫生服务医生对(未来)公务员的评估的法律、道德和角色期望之间的紧张关系]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Peter Schröder-Bäck, Kerstin Brixius
{"title":"[在希波克拉底和就职宣誓之间:关于公共卫生服务医生对(未来)公务员的评估的法律、道德和角色期望之间的紧张关系]。","authors":"Peter Schröder-Bäck, Kerstin Brixius","doi":"10.1055/a-2505-2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessments in the German Public Health Service take place, among other things, in the recruitment and incapacity assessment of civil servants. This may lead to conflicts of values and norms for assessing doctors, as they have to make decisions that are not necessarily in the interests of the person being assessed. Legally, the expectations of assessing doctors in public administration are largely defined. For public health service physicians, individual normative role conflicts still appear, and questions arise as to whether conscientious decisions of physicians adhere to legal requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Between Hippocrates and the Oath of Office: Tensions between legal, moral and role expectations with regard to Public Health Service Physician assessments of (future) public servants].\",\"authors\":\"Peter Schröder-Bäck, Kerstin Brixius\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2505-2011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessments in the German Public Health Service take place, among other things, in the recruitment and incapacity assessment of civil servants. This may lead to conflicts of values and norms for assessing doctors, as they have to make decisions that are not necessarily in the interests of the person being assessed. Legally, the expectations of assessing doctors in public administration are largely defined. For public health service physicians, individual normative role conflicts still appear, and questions arise as to whether conscientious decisions of physicians adhere to legal requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-2011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-2011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国公共卫生服务部门的评估工作,除其他外,包括公务员的招聘和丧失工作能力评估。这可能会导致评估医生的价值观和规范的冲突,因为他们必须做出不一定符合被评估者利益的决定。从法律上讲,评估公共行政部门医生的期望在很大程度上是明确的。对于公共卫生服务医生来说,个人规范性角色冲突仍然存在,并且出现了医生的良心决定是否符合法律要求的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Between Hippocrates and the Oath of Office: Tensions between legal, moral and role expectations with regard to Public Health Service Physician assessments of (future) public servants].

Assessments in the German Public Health Service take place, among other things, in the recruitment and incapacity assessment of civil servants. This may lead to conflicts of values and norms for assessing doctors, as they have to make decisions that are not necessarily in the interests of the person being assessed. Legally, the expectations of assessing doctors in public administration are largely defined. For public health service physicians, individual normative role conflicts still appear, and questions arise as to whether conscientious decisions of physicians adhere to legal requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信