月经跟踪应用程序的问题:提出一种新的关键范围审查方法,用于绘制和解释研究文献。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarah Riley, Siobhán Healy-Cullen, Carla Rice, Katrin Tiidenberg, Alexandra Hawkey, Adrienne Evans, Christine Stephens, Jessica Tappin, Astrid Ensslin, Tracy Morison
{"title":"月经跟踪应用程序的问题:提出一种新的关键范围审查方法,用于绘制和解释研究文献。","authors":"Sarah Riley, Siobhán Healy-Cullen, Carla Rice, Katrin Tiidenberg, Alexandra Hawkey, Adrienne Evans, Christine Stephens, Jessica Tappin, Astrid Ensslin, Tracy Morison","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2024.2445518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To showcase a novel, theoretically informed methodology for conducting scoping reviews by operationalising critical theory. And to advance the field of women's digital health by applying this critical scoping review methodology (CSR) to research on menstrual tracking apps (MTAs).</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>116 articles published in English, between November 2015 and November 2023, focusing on MTAs, and/or user's experiences of MTAs, were thematically analysed through the Foucauldian concept of problematisation and analytics from critical psychology. This method examined what was produced as a problem, and the underpinning discourses, subject positions, paradigms, desired outcomes, and absences within these problem categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four problematisations were identified, (1) the problem of data privacy (subproblems: type of data, consent, abortion surveillance); (2) the problem with efficacy (subproblems: evaluating efficacy, accuracy, useability); (3) the problem of regulation (subproblems: self-surveillance, normative femininity, hormonal imperative, cycle regularity imperative, menstrual stigma); and (4) the problem of women (subproblems: health literacy, technology use, medically unknown, hard to design for).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MTA researchers would benefit from understanding their field through these problematisations. The CSR offers an important theoretically informed methodology for mapping and interpreting a research literature, which can identify, and expand, possibilities for research thought and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematising menstrual tracking apps: presenting a novel critical scoping review methodology for mapping and interpreting research literature.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Riley, Siobhán Healy-Cullen, Carla Rice, Katrin Tiidenberg, Alexandra Hawkey, Adrienne Evans, Christine Stephens, Jessica Tappin, Astrid Ensslin, Tracy Morison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2024.2445518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To showcase a novel, theoretically informed methodology for conducting scoping reviews by operationalising critical theory. And to advance the field of women's digital health by applying this critical scoping review methodology (CSR) to research on menstrual tracking apps (MTAs).</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>116 articles published in English, between November 2015 and November 2023, focusing on MTAs, and/or user's experiences of MTAs, were thematically analysed through the Foucauldian concept of problematisation and analytics from critical psychology. This method examined what was produced as a problem, and the underpinning discourses, subject positions, paradigms, desired outcomes, and absences within these problem categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four problematisations were identified, (1) the problem of data privacy (subproblems: type of data, consent, abortion surveillance); (2) the problem with efficacy (subproblems: evaluating efficacy, accuracy, useability); (3) the problem of regulation (subproblems: self-surveillance, normative femininity, hormonal imperative, cycle regularity imperative, menstrual stigma); and (4) the problem of women (subproblems: health literacy, technology use, medically unknown, hard to design for).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MTA researchers would benefit from understanding their field through these problematisations. The CSR offers an important theoretically informed methodology for mapping and interpreting a research literature, which can identify, and expand, possibilities for research thought and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2445518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2445518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:展示一种新颖的,理论上知情的方法,通过操作批判理论来进行范围审查。并通过将这种关键的范围审查方法(CSR)应用于月经跟踪应用程序(mta)的研究,推动女性数字健康领域的发展。方法和措施:从2015年11月到2023年11月,通过批判心理学的问题化和分析的福柯式概念,对116篇专注于mta和/或mta用户体验的英文文章进行了主题分析。这种方法检查了作为问题产生的东西,以及这些问题类别中的基础话语、主体立场、范式、期望结果和缺失。结果:发现了四个问题:(1)数据隐私问题(子问题:数据类型、同意、堕胎监控);(2)功效问题(子问题:评价功效、准确性、可用性);(3)调节问题(子问题:自我监控、规范女性气质、荷尔蒙命令性、周期规律命令性、月经耻辱感);(4)女性问题(子问题:健康素养、技术使用、医学未知、难以设计)。结论:MTA研究人员将受益于通过这些问题了解他们的领域。企业社会责任为绘制和解释研究文献提供了重要的理论指导方法,可以识别并扩展研究思想和实践的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematising menstrual tracking apps: presenting a novel critical scoping review methodology for mapping and interpreting research literature.

Objectives: To showcase a novel, theoretically informed methodology for conducting scoping reviews by operationalising critical theory. And to advance the field of women's digital health by applying this critical scoping review methodology (CSR) to research on menstrual tracking apps (MTAs).

Methods and measures: 116 articles published in English, between November 2015 and November 2023, focusing on MTAs, and/or user's experiences of MTAs, were thematically analysed through the Foucauldian concept of problematisation and analytics from critical psychology. This method examined what was produced as a problem, and the underpinning discourses, subject positions, paradigms, desired outcomes, and absences within these problem categories.

Results: Four problematisations were identified, (1) the problem of data privacy (subproblems: type of data, consent, abortion surveillance); (2) the problem with efficacy (subproblems: evaluating efficacy, accuracy, useability); (3) the problem of regulation (subproblems: self-surveillance, normative femininity, hormonal imperative, cycle regularity imperative, menstrual stigma); and (4) the problem of women (subproblems: health literacy, technology use, medically unknown, hard to design for).

Conclusion: MTA researchers would benefit from understanding their field through these problematisations. The CSR offers an important theoretically informed methodology for mapping and interpreting a research literature, which can identify, and expand, possibilities for research thought and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信