Elizabeta Krstevska Bozhinovikj, Nadica Matevska-Geshkovska, Marija Staninova Stojovska, Emilija Gjorgievska, Aleksandra Jovanovska, Nevenka Ridova, Irina Panovska Stavridis, Svetlana Kocheva, Aleksandar Dimovski
{"title":"新一代测序确定的微小残留疾病的存在并不是急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童预后的可靠生物标志物。","authors":"Elizabeta Krstevska Bozhinovikj, Nadica Matevska-Geshkovska, Marija Staninova Stojovska, Emilija Gjorgievska, Aleksandra Jovanovska, Nevenka Ridova, Irina Panovska Stavridis, Svetlana Kocheva, Aleksandar Dimovski","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2456100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still under consideration. Fifty pediatric patients were prospectively evaluated for specific clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes using NGS analysis at diagnosis and on days 33 and 78 from therapy onset. The prognostic value or the NGS-MRD status was analyzed after a median follow-up of 4 years. All but one patient with negative NGS-MRD status on day 33 are in clinical remission. A total of 29 (58%) patients were NGS-MRD positive on day 33, of which 9 (18%) patients remained positive on day 78. However, only a small percentage of the patients with positive NGS-MRD status on day 33 and day 78 relapsed: 21% (6/29) and 33% (3/9), respectively. Positive NGS-MRD status is not a reliable prognostic biomarker in children with ALL and warrants careful consideration in disease stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1121-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presence of minimal residual disease determined by next-generation sequencing is not a reliable prognostic biomarker in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeta Krstevska Bozhinovikj, Nadica Matevska-Geshkovska, Marija Staninova Stojovska, Emilija Gjorgievska, Aleksandra Jovanovska, Nevenka Ridova, Irina Panovska Stavridis, Svetlana Kocheva, Aleksandar Dimovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2025.2456100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still under consideration. Fifty pediatric patients were prospectively evaluated for specific clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes using NGS analysis at diagnosis and on days 33 and 78 from therapy onset. The prognostic value or the NGS-MRD status was analyzed after a median follow-up of 4 years. All but one patient with negative NGS-MRD status on day 33 are in clinical remission. A total of 29 (58%) patients were NGS-MRD positive on day 33, of which 9 (18%) patients remained positive on day 78. However, only a small percentage of the patients with positive NGS-MRD status on day 33 and day 78 relapsed: 21% (6/29) and 33% (3/9), respectively. Positive NGS-MRD status is not a reliable prognostic biomarker in children with ALL and warrants careful consideration in disease stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1121-1128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2456100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2456100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Presence of minimal residual disease determined by next-generation sequencing is not a reliable prognostic biomarker in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
The role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still under consideration. Fifty pediatric patients were prospectively evaluated for specific clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes using NGS analysis at diagnosis and on days 33 and 78 from therapy onset. The prognostic value or the NGS-MRD status was analyzed after a median follow-up of 4 years. All but one patient with negative NGS-MRD status on day 33 are in clinical remission. A total of 29 (58%) patients were NGS-MRD positive on day 33, of which 9 (18%) patients remained positive on day 78. However, only a small percentage of the patients with positive NGS-MRD status on day 33 and day 78 relapsed: 21% (6/29) and 33% (3/9), respectively. Positive NGS-MRD status is not a reliable prognostic biomarker in children with ALL and warrants careful consideration in disease stratification.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor