退伍军人健康管理中涉及远程医疗的不良事件

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter D Mills, Anne Tomolo, Edward E Yackel
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理中涉及远程医疗的不良事件","authors":"Peter D Mills, Anne Tomolo, Edward E Yackel","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth involves providing health care remotely using communication tools such as telephone, video, and remote patient monitoring. Research on telehealth has shown many benefits, including improved access to care and reduced costs, and drawbacks, including delays in care, breakdowns in communication, and missed diagnoses. The use of telehealth nationally, including in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its increased use, few studies have described adverse events or the role of patient safety in the provision of telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors looked at all reports of adverse events and close calls in the VHA involving the use of telehealth between October 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023, and coded each case for the location of the event, type of event, and causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 reports met criteria for review. Most events occurred in primary care, outpatient behavioral health, and radiology, with delays in care, medication errors, and equipment problems being common types. Most reported events did not cause harm; 45 cases were identified as an unsafe condition, 37 as a close call, and 15 as causing some harm to the patient. There were 3,609,105 telehealth episodes of care during this time, resulting in a reporting rate of 4.02 per 100,000 episodes of care and 0.42 reports of harm per 100,000 episodes of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most frequent telehealth-related events were delays in care, medication errors, and equipment issues, and most events were not unique to this modality. Further research is needed to characterize safety events unique to telehealth to better define parameters for patient safety activities. Recommendations to reduce errors include ongoing provider training, human factors analysis of telehealth processes, simplifying processes and procedures for providers and patients to get help for technical or knowledge deficits in real time, and examining the business rules for telehealth care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Events Involving Telehealth in the Veterans Health Administration.\",\"authors\":\"Peter D Mills, Anne Tomolo, Edward E Yackel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth involves providing health care remotely using communication tools such as telephone, video, and remote patient monitoring. Research on telehealth has shown many benefits, including improved access to care and reduced costs, and drawbacks, including delays in care, breakdowns in communication, and missed diagnoses. The use of telehealth nationally, including in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its increased use, few studies have described adverse events or the role of patient safety in the provision of telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors looked at all reports of adverse events and close calls in the VHA involving the use of telehealth between October 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023, and coded each case for the location of the event, type of event, and causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 reports met criteria for review. Most events occurred in primary care, outpatient behavioral health, and radiology, with delays in care, medication errors, and equipment problems being common types. Most reported events did not cause harm; 45 cases were identified as an unsafe condition, 37 as a close call, and 15 as causing some harm to the patient. There were 3,609,105 telehealth episodes of care during this time, resulting in a reporting rate of 4.02 per 100,000 episodes of care and 0.42 reports of harm per 100,000 episodes of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most frequent telehealth-related events were delays in care, medication errors, and equipment issues, and most events were not unique to this modality. Further research is needed to characterize safety events unique to telehealth to better define parameters for patient safety activities. Recommendations to reduce errors include ongoing provider training, human factors analysis of telehealth processes, simplifying processes and procedures for providers and patients to get help for technical or knowledge deficits in real time, and examining the business rules for telehealth care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程医疗包括使用电话、视频和远程患者监护等通信工具远程提供医疗保健。关于远程保健的研究显示了许多好处,包括改善获得护理的机会和降低成本,以及缺点,包括护理延误、沟通中断和漏诊。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,包括退伍军人健康管理局在内的全国范围内,远程医疗的使用急剧扩大。尽管远程医疗的使用有所增加,但很少有研究描述了不良事件或患者安全在提供远程医疗中的作用。方法:作者查看了2022年10月1日至2023年2月2日期间VHA中涉及远程医疗使用的所有不良事件和近距离呼叫报告,并根据事件的位置、事件类型和原因对每个病例进行了编码。结果:145份报告符合审查标准。大多数事件发生在初级保健、门诊行为健康和放射科,其中护理延误、用药错误和设备问题是常见的类型。大多数报道的事件没有造成伤害;45例被确定为不安全情况,37例为死里逃生,15例对患者造成一定伤害。在此期间,有3 609 105次远程保健护理,报告率为每10万次护理4.02次,每10万次护理0.42次报告伤害。结论:最常见的远程健康事件是护理延误、用药错误和设备问题,并且大多数事件并非这种模式所独有。需要进一步研究远程保健特有的安全事件特征,以便更好地确定患者安全活动的参数。减少错误的建议包括正在进行的提供者培训、远程保健流程的人为因素分析、简化流程和程序,以便提供者和患者实时获得技术或知识缺陷方面的帮助,以及审查远程保健的业务规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse Events Involving Telehealth in the Veterans Health Administration.

Background: Telehealth involves providing health care remotely using communication tools such as telephone, video, and remote patient monitoring. Research on telehealth has shown many benefits, including improved access to care and reduced costs, and drawbacks, including delays in care, breakdowns in communication, and missed diagnoses. The use of telehealth nationally, including in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its increased use, few studies have described adverse events or the role of patient safety in the provision of telehealth.

Methods: The authors looked at all reports of adverse events and close calls in the VHA involving the use of telehealth between October 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023, and coded each case for the location of the event, type of event, and causes.

Results: A total of 145 reports met criteria for review. Most events occurred in primary care, outpatient behavioral health, and radiology, with delays in care, medication errors, and equipment problems being common types. Most reported events did not cause harm; 45 cases were identified as an unsafe condition, 37 as a close call, and 15 as causing some harm to the patient. There were 3,609,105 telehealth episodes of care during this time, resulting in a reporting rate of 4.02 per 100,000 episodes of care and 0.42 reports of harm per 100,000 episodes of care.

Conclusion: The most frequent telehealth-related events were delays in care, medication errors, and equipment issues, and most events were not unique to this modality. Further research is needed to characterize safety events unique to telehealth to better define parameters for patient safety activities. Recommendations to reduce errors include ongoing provider training, human factors analysis of telehealth processes, simplifying processes and procedures for providers and patients to get help for technical or knowledge deficits in real time, and examining the business rules for telehealth care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信