消失的双胞胎,子宫内的自然选择,以及美国的婴儿死亡率。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/emph/eoae035
Ralph Catalano, Joan Casey, Allison Stolte, Hedwig Lee, Alison Gemmill, Brenda Bustos, Tim Bruckner
{"title":"消失的双胞胎,子宫内的自然选择,以及美国的婴儿死亡率。","authors":"Ralph Catalano, Joan Casey, Allison Stolte, Hedwig Lee, Alison Gemmill, Brenda Bustos, Tim Bruckner","doi":"10.1093/emph/eoae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research to identify fetal predictors of infant mortality among singletons born in the United States (US) concludes that poorly understood and unmeasured \"confounders\" produce a spurious association between fetal size and infant death. We argue that these confounders include Vanishing Twin Syndrome (VTS)-the clinical manifestation of selection against frail male twins <i>in utero</i>. We test our argument in 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We use Box-Jenkins transfer function modeling to test the hypothesis that among infants born from 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017, the sex ratio of twins born in the 37th week of gestation will correlate inversely with infant mortality among singleton males born at the 40th week of gestation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find support for our hypothesis and infer that the contribution of survivors of VTS to temporal variation in infant mortality among the hardiest of singleton male infants, those born at 40 weeks gestation, ranged from a decrease of about 7% to an increase of about 5% over our 276 monthly conception cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>We conclude that an evolutionary perspective on fetal loss makes a heretofore \"unmeasured confounder\" of the relationship between fetal size and infant mortality both explicable and measurable. This finding may help clinicians better anticipate changes over time in the incidence of infant mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12156,"journal":{"name":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vanishing twins, selection <i>in utero</i>, and infant mortality in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Catalano, Joan Casey, Allison Stolte, Hedwig Lee, Alison Gemmill, Brenda Bustos, Tim Bruckner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/emph/eoae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research to identify fetal predictors of infant mortality among singletons born in the United States (US) concludes that poorly understood and unmeasured \\\"confounders\\\" produce a spurious association between fetal size and infant death. We argue that these confounders include Vanishing Twin Syndrome (VTS)-the clinical manifestation of selection against frail male twins <i>in utero</i>. We test our argument in 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We use Box-Jenkins transfer function modeling to test the hypothesis that among infants born from 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017, the sex ratio of twins born in the 37th week of gestation will correlate inversely with infant mortality among singleton males born at the 40th week of gestation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find support for our hypothesis and infer that the contribution of survivors of VTS to temporal variation in infant mortality among the hardiest of singleton male infants, those born at 40 weeks gestation, ranged from a decrease of about 7% to an increase of about 5% over our 276 monthly conception cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>We conclude that an evolutionary perspective on fetal loss makes a heretofore \\\"unmeasured confounder\\\" of the relationship between fetal size and infant mortality both explicable and measurable. This finding may help clinicians better anticipate changes over time in the incidence of infant mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"5-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoae035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoae035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在美国出生的单胎婴儿中确定胎儿死亡率预测因子的研究得出结论,对“混杂因素”了解不足和未测量的“混杂因素”产生了胎儿大小和婴儿死亡之间的虚假关联。我们认为这些混杂因素包括消失双胞胎综合征(VTS)-对子宫内脆弱的男性双胞胎的选择的临床表现。我们在1995年1月至2017年12月期间在美国怀孕的276个月度受孕队列中验证了我们的论点。方法:我们使用Box-Jenkins传递函数模型来检验一种假设,即在1995年1月至2017年12月在美国怀孕的276个月受孕队列中出生的婴儿中,妊娠第37周出生的双胞胎的性别比例与妊娠第40周出生的单胎男性的婴儿死亡率呈负相关。结果:我们发现支持我们的假设,并推断,在276个月受孕队列中,在妊娠40周出生的最顽强的单胎男婴中,VTS幸存者对婴儿死亡率时间变化的贡献从约7%到约5%不等。结论和意义:我们的结论是,胎儿损失的进化观点使得胎儿大小和婴儿死亡率之间的关系成为迄今为止“不可测量的混杂因素”,既可以解释,也可以测量。这一发现可能有助于临床医生更好地预测婴儿死亡率随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vanishing twins, selection in utero, and infant mortality in the United States.

Background and objectives: Research to identify fetal predictors of infant mortality among singletons born in the United States (US) concludes that poorly understood and unmeasured "confounders" produce a spurious association between fetal size and infant death. We argue that these confounders include Vanishing Twin Syndrome (VTS)-the clinical manifestation of selection against frail male twins in utero. We test our argument in 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017.

Methodology: We use Box-Jenkins transfer function modeling to test the hypothesis that among infants born from 276 monthly conception cohorts conceived in the US from January 1995 through December 2017, the sex ratio of twins born in the 37th week of gestation will correlate inversely with infant mortality among singleton males born at the 40th week of gestation.

Results: We find support for our hypothesis and infer that the contribution of survivors of VTS to temporal variation in infant mortality among the hardiest of singleton male infants, those born at 40 weeks gestation, ranged from a decrease of about 7% to an increase of about 5% over our 276 monthly conception cohorts.

Conclusions and implications: We conclude that an evolutionary perspective on fetal loss makes a heretofore "unmeasured confounder" of the relationship between fetal size and infant mortality both explicable and measurable. This finding may help clinicians better anticipate changes over time in the incidence of infant mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Founded by Stephen Stearns in 2013, Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health is an open access journal that publishes original, rigorous applications of evolutionary science to issues in medicine and public health. It aims to connect evolutionary biology with the health sciences to produce insights that may reduce suffering and save lives. Because evolutionary biology is a basic science that reaches across many disciplines, this journal is open to contributions on a broad range of topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信