质量改进:超声引导插管治疗内外科病人静脉注射困难:质量改进项目。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
American Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1097/AJN.0000000000000016
Odaro Owen, David C Mulkey, Aldrin Nieves
{"title":"质量改进:超声引导插管治疗内外科病人静脉注射困难:质量改进项目。","authors":"Odaro Owen, David C Mulkey, Aldrin Nieves","doi":"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on a chart review of 164 patients admitted to our medical-surgical unit over 2 months and who underwent peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannula insertion, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) was found in 35% (57) of patients. Similarly, the first-attempt PIV cannula insertion failure rate was 43% (70 of 164 patients) when nurses used the traditional landmark method of visual inspection and palpation in patients with DIVA.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this evidence-based quality improvement (QI) project was to determine if the use of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (USGPIV) cannulation would impact the rate of first-attempt PIV access among acute care adult patients with DIVA in the medical-surgical unit of an urban level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The timeline for this pilot project was 8 weeks (May 25, 2023, to July 20, 2023). The DIVA Clinical Predictor Tool was used to identify patients at risk for DIVA. Nurses used USGPIV cannulation on eligible patients. Data on first-attempt PIV access were collected from the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 patients (14 in the comparison group and 32 in the implementation group) participated in the project. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in first-attempt success rates from 64.3% (9 out of 14 participants) in the comparison group to 87.5% (28 out of 32 participants) in the implementation group; χ2 (1 df) = 3.34, P = 0.048. This represents a 23.2% improvement in the first-attempt success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, USGPIV cannulation improves the likelihood of first-attempt insertion success in patients with DIVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"125 2","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Improvement: Using Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation for Difficult IV Access in Medical-Surgical Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.\",\"authors\":\"Odaro Owen, David C Mulkey, Aldrin Nieves\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on a chart review of 164 patients admitted to our medical-surgical unit over 2 months and who underwent peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannula insertion, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) was found in 35% (57) of patients. Similarly, the first-attempt PIV cannula insertion failure rate was 43% (70 of 164 patients) when nurses used the traditional landmark method of visual inspection and palpation in patients with DIVA.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this evidence-based quality improvement (QI) project was to determine if the use of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (USGPIV) cannulation would impact the rate of first-attempt PIV access among acute care adult patients with DIVA in the medical-surgical unit of an urban level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The timeline for this pilot project was 8 weeks (May 25, 2023, to July 20, 2023). The DIVA Clinical Predictor Tool was used to identify patients at risk for DIVA. Nurses used USGPIV cannulation on eligible patients. Data on first-attempt PIV access were collected from the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 patients (14 in the comparison group and 32 in the implementation group) participated in the project. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in first-attempt success rates from 64.3% (9 out of 14 participants) in the comparison group to 87.5% (28 out of 32 participants) in the implementation group; χ2 (1 df) = 3.34, P = 0.048. This represents a 23.2% improvement in the first-attempt success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, USGPIV cannulation improves the likelihood of first-attempt insertion success in patients with DIVA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"125 2\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于对我们内科-外科住院超过2个月并接受外周静脉(PIV)插管的164例患者的图表回顾,发现35%(57)的患者存在静脉通路困难(DIVA)。同样,当护士在DIVA患者中使用传统的目测和触诊标志性方法时,首次尝试PIV插管的失败率为43%(164例患者中有70例)。目的:本循证质量改进(QI)项目的目的是确定超声引导下外周静脉插管(USGPIV)的使用是否会影响城市一级创伤中心内外科急诊成人DIVA患者首次尝试PIV的比率。方法:试验时间为8周(2023年5月25日至2023年7月20日)。DIVA临床预测工具用于识别有DIVA风险的患者。护士对符合条件的患者采用USGPIV插管。首次尝试PIV访问的数据从电子健康记录中收集。结果:共46例患者参与项目,其中对照组14例,实施组32例。结果显示,第一次尝试成功率从对照组的64.3%(14名参与者中的9名)提高到实施组的87.5%(32名参与者中的28名),具有统计学意义;χ2 (1df) = 3.34, P = 0.048。这意味着第一次尝试的成功率提高了23.2%。结论:基于这些结果,USGPIV插管提高了DIVA患者首次尝试插入成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Improvement: Using Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation for Difficult IV Access in Medical-Surgical Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background: Based on a chart review of 164 patients admitted to our medical-surgical unit over 2 months and who underwent peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannula insertion, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) was found in 35% (57) of patients. Similarly, the first-attempt PIV cannula insertion failure rate was 43% (70 of 164 patients) when nurses used the traditional landmark method of visual inspection and palpation in patients with DIVA.

Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based quality improvement (QI) project was to determine if the use of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (USGPIV) cannulation would impact the rate of first-attempt PIV access among acute care adult patients with DIVA in the medical-surgical unit of an urban level 1 trauma center.

Methods: The timeline for this pilot project was 8 weeks (May 25, 2023, to July 20, 2023). The DIVA Clinical Predictor Tool was used to identify patients at risk for DIVA. Nurses used USGPIV cannulation on eligible patients. Data on first-attempt PIV access were collected from the electronic health record.

Results: A total of 46 patients (14 in the comparison group and 32 in the implementation group) participated in the project. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in first-attempt success rates from 64.3% (9 out of 14 participants) in the comparison group to 87.5% (28 out of 32 participants) in the implementation group; χ2 (1 df) = 3.34, P = 0.048. This represents a 23.2% improvement in the first-attempt success rate.

Conclusion: Based on these results, USGPIV cannulation improves the likelihood of first-attempt insertion success in patients with DIVA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
604
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/). AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com. AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信