Kara A Stavros, Alexandra Michelle Miller, Jeremy J Moeller, Kimberly Wiseman, Sydney-Evelyn Gibbs, Xiaoyu Sun, Lynne Shindoll, Robert Rook, Michaela Morris, Tessa Dahlgren, Zachary London, Roy E Strowd
{"title":"教育研究:神经学家使用微教学和微评估项目进行教学、学习和病人护理需求:一项定性研究。","authors":"Kara A Stavros, Alexandra Michelle Miller, Jeremy J Moeller, Kimberly Wiseman, Sydney-Evelyn Gibbs, Xiaoyu Sun, Lynne Shindoll, Robert Rook, Michaela Morris, Tessa Dahlgren, Zachary London, Roy E Strowd","doi":"10.1212/NE9.0000000000200164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Microlearning is the acquisition of knowledge or skills in small units, commonly delivered by digital technology. NeuroBytes (NB) and Question of the Day (QOD) are 2 microinstructional programs in neurology. NB programs are brief, video-based mini-courses on clinical topics (microteaching); QODs are daily multiple-choice questions (microassessment). The aim of this study was to understand how neurologists use NB and QOD and to explore their influence on clinical practice, education, and lifelong learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to recruit neurologists or trainees who completed at least 1 NB program or 25 QODs within the past 3 months. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted to explore participants' use of NB/QOD, what they perceived as gained from the product, how learning influenced their practice, and how this influenced lifelong learning. Thematic analysis was conducted to generate codes and describe themes emerging from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 participants were interviewed. Neurologists were enthusiastic to use NB and QOD. Three themes were identified. NB and QOD were used to (1) enhance teaching, (2) influence clinical care, and (3) facilitate lifelong learning. Enhancing teaching: Interviewees used knowledge gained from NB/QOD in their own instruction and used NB/QOD with students. QOD was a model for writing their own assessments. Patient care: Respondents kept their knowledge current and reinforced concepts already known. QOD had less impact on patient care because it was used for identifying knowledge gaps, often outside the subspecialty niche. Lifelong learning: QOD was used to identify gaps in knowledge while NB filled educational gaps already recognized. NB and QOD were viewed as timesaving and could be completed on the fly. However, they were considered supplemental to other learning sources because they lacked depth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>NB and QOD are convenient supplemental resources for teaching, learning, and augmenting clinical practice. Microteaching and microassessment delivered through these programs fulfilled different learning needs and have complementary educational roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":520085,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Education","volume":"3 4","pages":"e200164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education Research: Use by Neurologists of Microteaching and Microassessment Programs for Teaching, Learning, and Patient Care Needs: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kara A Stavros, Alexandra Michelle Miller, Jeremy J Moeller, Kimberly Wiseman, Sydney-Evelyn Gibbs, Xiaoyu Sun, Lynne Shindoll, Robert Rook, Michaela Morris, Tessa Dahlgren, Zachary London, Roy E Strowd\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NE9.0000000000200164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Microlearning is the acquisition of knowledge or skills in small units, commonly delivered by digital technology. NeuroBytes (NB) and Question of the Day (QOD) are 2 microinstructional programs in neurology. NB programs are brief, video-based mini-courses on clinical topics (microteaching); QODs are daily multiple-choice questions (microassessment). The aim of this study was to understand how neurologists use NB and QOD and to explore their influence on clinical practice, education, and lifelong learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to recruit neurologists or trainees who completed at least 1 NB program or 25 QODs within the past 3 months. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted to explore participants' use of NB/QOD, what they perceived as gained from the product, how learning influenced their practice, and how this influenced lifelong learning. Thematic analysis was conducted to generate codes and describe themes emerging from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 participants were interviewed. Neurologists were enthusiastic to use NB and QOD. Three themes were identified. NB and QOD were used to (1) enhance teaching, (2) influence clinical care, and (3) facilitate lifelong learning. Enhancing teaching: Interviewees used knowledge gained from NB/QOD in their own instruction and used NB/QOD with students. QOD was a model for writing their own assessments. Patient care: Respondents kept their knowledge current and reinforced concepts already known. QOD had less impact on patient care because it was used for identifying knowledge gaps, often outside the subspecialty niche. Lifelong learning: QOD was used to identify gaps in knowledge while NB filled educational gaps already recognized. NB and QOD were viewed as timesaving and could be completed on the fly. However, they were considered supplemental to other learning sources because they lacked depth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>NB and QOD are convenient supplemental resources for teaching, learning, and augmenting clinical practice. Microteaching and microassessment delivered through these programs fulfilled different learning needs and have complementary educational roles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Education\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"e200164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目标:微学习是指以小单元获取知识或技能,通常由数字技术提供。NeuroBytes (NB)和Question of the Day (QOD)是神经学领域的两个微教学项目。NB课程是关于临床主题的简短视频迷你课程(微教学);qod是每日多项选择题(微评估)。本研究的目的是了解神经科医生如何使用NB和QOD,并探讨它们对临床实践、教育和终身学习的影响。方法:采用目的抽样的方法,招募在过去3个月内完成1次以上NB课程或25次qod的神经科医师或培训生。进行了个人半结构化访谈,以探讨参与者使用NB/QOD的情况,他们认为从产品中获得了什么,学习如何影响他们的实践,以及这如何影响终身学习。进行主题分析以生成代码并描述从数据中出现的主题。结果:共访谈28名参与者。神经科医生热衷于使用NB和QOD。确定了三个主题。利用NB和QOD(1)加强教学,(2)影响临床护理,(3)促进终身学习。加强教学:受访者将从NB/QOD中获得的知识运用到自己的教学中,并将NB/QOD运用到学生身上。QOD是他们自己编写评估的典范。病人护理:受访者保持他们的知识最新,并加强已经知道的概念。QOD对患者护理的影响较小,因为它被用于识别知识差距,通常在亚专科利基之外。终身学习:QOD用于识别知识差距,NB用于填补已经认识到的教育差距。NB和QOD被认为是节省时间的,可以在飞行中完成。然而,它们被认为是对其他学习资源的补充,因为它们缺乏深度。讨论:NB和QOD是教学、学习和增强临床实践的便捷补充资源。通过这些项目提供的微教学和微评估满足了不同的学习需求,并具有互补的教育作用。
Education Research: Use by Neurologists of Microteaching and Microassessment Programs for Teaching, Learning, and Patient Care Needs: A Qualitative Study.
Background and objectives: Microlearning is the acquisition of knowledge or skills in small units, commonly delivered by digital technology. NeuroBytes (NB) and Question of the Day (QOD) are 2 microinstructional programs in neurology. NB programs are brief, video-based mini-courses on clinical topics (microteaching); QODs are daily multiple-choice questions (microassessment). The aim of this study was to understand how neurologists use NB and QOD and to explore their influence on clinical practice, education, and lifelong learning.
Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit neurologists or trainees who completed at least 1 NB program or 25 QODs within the past 3 months. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted to explore participants' use of NB/QOD, what they perceived as gained from the product, how learning influenced their practice, and how this influenced lifelong learning. Thematic analysis was conducted to generate codes and describe themes emerging from the data.
Results: A total of 28 participants were interviewed. Neurologists were enthusiastic to use NB and QOD. Three themes were identified. NB and QOD were used to (1) enhance teaching, (2) influence clinical care, and (3) facilitate lifelong learning. Enhancing teaching: Interviewees used knowledge gained from NB/QOD in their own instruction and used NB/QOD with students. QOD was a model for writing their own assessments. Patient care: Respondents kept their knowledge current and reinforced concepts already known. QOD had less impact on patient care because it was used for identifying knowledge gaps, often outside the subspecialty niche. Lifelong learning: QOD was used to identify gaps in knowledge while NB filled educational gaps already recognized. NB and QOD were viewed as timesaving and could be completed on the fly. However, they were considered supplemental to other learning sources because they lacked depth.
Discussion: NB and QOD are convenient supplemental resources for teaching, learning, and augmenting clinical practice. Microteaching and microassessment delivered through these programs fulfilled different learning needs and have complementary educational roles.