老年人护理模式:范围审查。

Ann Dadich, Angela Lan, Suhasini Shanmugarajan, Sarah Childs, Jennifer Alford, Danielle Ní Chróinín
{"title":"老年人护理模式:范围审查。","authors":"Ann Dadich, Angela Lan, Suhasini Shanmugarajan, Sarah Childs, Jennifer Alford, Danielle Ní Chróinín","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International recognition of the increasing importance of care for older people has seen growing interest in models of care for older people. Yet there is limited information about the scope and breadth of models of care for older people. This article clarifies what is known about models of care for older people by summarizing relevant publications, describing the models depicted in these publications, and synthesizing the outcomes and impact presented in the publications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted that involved searching multiple databases to identify relevant publications, published in English, which presented a model of care for older people-specifically, non-Indigenous people aged ≥ 65 years and/or Indigenous people aged ≥ 50 years; and included evidence, broadly defined, about the utility or otherwise of the model. Commentaries, narrative letters, editorials, and reviews were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 21,767 publications, 276 were deemed relevant. From these, four key findings are apparent. First, models of care for older people are understood in disparate ways and are typically devoid of clear stepwise guidance. Second, most of the publications reported on a multidisciplinary approach. Third, they generally failed to involve carers. Fourth, very few publications reported on studies conducted in a rural area, and none involved Indigenous people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the heterogeneity and breadth of models of care for older people, further research is needed to establish: a definition of a model of care for older people; reporting standards; the factors that help or hinder their effectiveness; how to ensure carer involvement; and how to adapt models of care for older people for priority populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of Care for Older People: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Dadich, Angela Lan, Suhasini Shanmugarajan, Sarah Childs, Jennifer Alford, Danielle Ní Chróinín\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International recognition of the increasing importance of care for older people has seen growing interest in models of care for older people. Yet there is limited information about the scope and breadth of models of care for older people. This article clarifies what is known about models of care for older people by summarizing relevant publications, describing the models depicted in these publications, and synthesizing the outcomes and impact presented in the publications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted that involved searching multiple databases to identify relevant publications, published in English, which presented a model of care for older people-specifically, non-Indigenous people aged ≥ 65 years and/or Indigenous people aged ≥ 50 years; and included evidence, broadly defined, about the utility or otherwise of the model. Commentaries, narrative letters, editorials, and reviews were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 21,767 publications, 276 were deemed relevant. From these, four key findings are apparent. First, models of care for older people are understood in disparate ways and are typically devoid of clear stepwise guidance. Second, most of the publications reported on a multidisciplinary approach. Third, they generally failed to involve carers. Fourth, very few publications reported on studies conducted in a rural area, and none involved Indigenous people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the heterogeneity and breadth of models of care for older people, further research is needed to establish: a definition of a model of care for older people; reporting standards; the factors that help or hinder their effectiveness; how to ensure carer involvement; and how to adapt models of care for older people for priority populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着国际社会认识到老年人护理日益重要,人们对老年人护理模式的兴趣日益浓厚。然而,关于老年人护理模式的范围和广度的信息有限。本文通过总结相关出版物,描述这些出版物中描述的模型,并综合出版物中提出的结果和影响,澄清了对老年人护理模式的了解。方法:进行范围综述,检索多个数据库,以确定相关的英文出版物,这些出版物提出了老年人护理模式-特别是≥65岁的非土著居民和/或≥50岁的土著居民;并包括广义的证据,关于模型的效用或其他方面。评论、叙述性信件、社论和评论被排除在外。结果:在21767篇出版物中,276篇被认为是相关的。从这些发现中,有四个关键发现是显而易见的。首先,人们对老年人护理模式的理解各不相同,通常缺乏明确的分步指导。其次,大多数出版物报道了多学科方法。第三,他们通常没有让护理人员参与进来。第四,很少有出版物报道在农村地区进行的研究,而且没有一项涉及土著人民。结论:鉴于老年人护理模式的异质性和广度,需要进一步研究建立:老年人护理模式的定义;报告标准;影响因素:帮助或阻碍其有效性的因素;如何确保照顾参与;以及如何为重点人群调整老年人护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models of Care for Older People: A Scoping Review.

Background: International recognition of the increasing importance of care for older people has seen growing interest in models of care for older people. Yet there is limited information about the scope and breadth of models of care for older people. This article clarifies what is known about models of care for older people by summarizing relevant publications, describing the models depicted in these publications, and synthesizing the outcomes and impact presented in the publications.

Method: A scoping review was conducted that involved searching multiple databases to identify relevant publications, published in English, which presented a model of care for older people-specifically, non-Indigenous people aged ≥ 65 years and/or Indigenous people aged ≥ 50 years; and included evidence, broadly defined, about the utility or otherwise of the model. Commentaries, narrative letters, editorials, and reviews were excluded.

Results: From 21,767 publications, 276 were deemed relevant. From these, four key findings are apparent. First, models of care for older people are understood in disparate ways and are typically devoid of clear stepwise guidance. Second, most of the publications reported on a multidisciplinary approach. Third, they generally failed to involve carers. Fourth, very few publications reported on studies conducted in a rural area, and none involved Indigenous people.

Conclusion: Given the heterogeneity and breadth of models of care for older people, further research is needed to establish: a definition of a model of care for older people; reporting standards; the factors that help or hinder their effectiveness; how to ensure carer involvement; and how to adapt models of care for older people for priority populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信