值得思考的食物:帕帕斯菲塔。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Marina Silva Ferreira, Juan Carlos Nunez, Mandi Sehgal
{"title":"值得思考的食物:帕帕斯菲塔。","authors":"Marina Silva Ferreira,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Nunez,&nbsp;Mandi Sehgal","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mrs. M is an 80-year-old fully dependent, Spanish-speaking woman with severe Alzheimer's dementia seen as an inpatient by Geriatric Medicine for a goals of care discussion.</p><p>She was admitted due to septic shock (MRSA bacteremia) and possible endocarditis, requiring a prolonged admission in the intensive care unit (ICU). She was started on pressors and broad-spectrum antibiotics and underwent invasive procedures. Due to her prolonged ICU stay, her clinical status significantly deteriorated, including severe dysphagia. Eventually, she was transferred from the ICU to the general medical floor; however, her severe frailty and dysphagia remained unchanged, and PEG tube placement and other invasive procedures were brought up by the interprofessional admitting team.</p><p>Her daughter, who was her health care surrogate (HCS), requested ‘everything to be done,’ including maintaining full code status, a transesophageal echo to confirm endocarditis, and PEG placement, and refused consultation from palliative care. Geriatric medicine was then consulted for a goals of care discussion.</p><p>During our consultation, we observed Mrs. M to be a frail person living with severe dementia, whose speech was limited to yes and no answers. We called her daughter and asked if she could join us and her mother in person to identify her concerns and expectations regarding her mother's health.</p><p>After a long discussion with Mrs. M's daughter, we identified that one of her biggest fears was that her mother was not able to nourish herself due to dysphagia and, as a result, was getting weaker. This was her reason for wanting a PEG tube to be placed. We took the time to explain the importance of small pleasures at the end of life and that the PEG tube would provide more harm than good at this stage of her mother's illness. We asked what her favorite food was, and her daughter answered ‘papas fritas’ (French fries); see Figure 1: image of Papas Fritas or French Fries. We recommended a liberalized diet, and in the following days her daughter started to give her small amounts of french fries as tolerated. After that, her daughter requested a change of code status to DNR, declined PEG tube placement, and accepted a hospice consultation for her mother.</p><p>Mrs. M's story reminds us how important goals of care discussions are to identify <b>what matters most</b> to our patients and to make sure we work to always honor their wishes, but especially at the end of life. It also reminds us how crucial it is, even more in a setting of the <b>diagnosis of dementia</b>, to have those conversations early rather than when the disease is already too advanced for them to be able to determine their priorities at the end of life.</p><p>Many times, goals of care discussions are avoided due to time restraints, moral barriers, or due to perceived resistance from patients or families. In practice, we do see resistance from patients to talk about this matter, and depending on their individual culture and beliefs, this type of conversation is, at times, not welcomed.</p><p>In Mrs. M's case, her daughter initially resisted these conversations as she believed that having a PEG tube placed would be beneficial for her mother. However, once we were able to identify that a feeding tube was not in alignment with <b>What mattered most</b> to her mother, and being able to address the daughter's concerns and expectations, she understood that the most important thing was to provide her mother with comfort.</p><p>It is always important to have goals of care discussions with patients with <b>dementia</b> early in their diagnosis, ideally with both the patient and their caregivers present in a calm, non-stressed environment, which allows time to provide information and correct misconceptions regarding care and assures that when the time comes, what matters most to the patient will be respected [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>Each of the authors contributed to the writing and editing of this manuscript.</p><p>Dr. Sehgal is the section editor for the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Education and Training Section. Drs. Nunez and Ferreira have nothing to disclose.</p><p>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 3","pages":"993-994"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food for Thought: Papas Fritas\",\"authors\":\"Marina Silva Ferreira,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Nunez,&nbsp;Mandi Sehgal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mrs. M is an 80-year-old fully dependent, Spanish-speaking woman with severe Alzheimer's dementia seen as an inpatient by Geriatric Medicine for a goals of care discussion.</p><p>She was admitted due to septic shock (MRSA bacteremia) and possible endocarditis, requiring a prolonged admission in the intensive care unit (ICU). She was started on pressors and broad-spectrum antibiotics and underwent invasive procedures. Due to her prolonged ICU stay, her clinical status significantly deteriorated, including severe dysphagia. Eventually, she was transferred from the ICU to the general medical floor; however, her severe frailty and dysphagia remained unchanged, and PEG tube placement and other invasive procedures were brought up by the interprofessional admitting team.</p><p>Her daughter, who was her health care surrogate (HCS), requested ‘everything to be done,’ including maintaining full code status, a transesophageal echo to confirm endocarditis, and PEG placement, and refused consultation from palliative care. Geriatric medicine was then consulted for a goals of care discussion.</p><p>During our consultation, we observed Mrs. M to be a frail person living with severe dementia, whose speech was limited to yes and no answers. We called her daughter and asked if she could join us and her mother in person to identify her concerns and expectations regarding her mother's health.</p><p>After a long discussion with Mrs. M's daughter, we identified that one of her biggest fears was that her mother was not able to nourish herself due to dysphagia and, as a result, was getting weaker. This was her reason for wanting a PEG tube to be placed. We took the time to explain the importance of small pleasures at the end of life and that the PEG tube would provide more harm than good at this stage of her mother's illness. We asked what her favorite food was, and her daughter answered ‘papas fritas’ (French fries); see Figure 1: image of Papas Fritas or French Fries. We recommended a liberalized diet, and in the following days her daughter started to give her small amounts of french fries as tolerated. After that, her daughter requested a change of code status to DNR, declined PEG tube placement, and accepted a hospice consultation for her mother.</p><p>Mrs. M's story reminds us how important goals of care discussions are to identify <b>what matters most</b> to our patients and to make sure we work to always honor their wishes, but especially at the end of life. It also reminds us how crucial it is, even more in a setting of the <b>diagnosis of dementia</b>, to have those conversations early rather than when the disease is already too advanced for them to be able to determine their priorities at the end of life.</p><p>Many times, goals of care discussions are avoided due to time restraints, moral barriers, or due to perceived resistance from patients or families. In practice, we do see resistance from patients to talk about this matter, and depending on their individual culture and beliefs, this type of conversation is, at times, not welcomed.</p><p>In Mrs. M's case, her daughter initially resisted these conversations as she believed that having a PEG tube placed would be beneficial for her mother. However, once we were able to identify that a feeding tube was not in alignment with <b>What mattered most</b> to her mother, and being able to address the daughter's concerns and expectations, she understood that the most important thing was to provide her mother with comfort.</p><p>It is always important to have goals of care discussions with patients with <b>dementia</b> early in their diagnosis, ideally with both the patient and their caregivers present in a calm, non-stressed environment, which allows time to provide information and correct misconceptions regarding care and assures that when the time comes, what matters most to the patient will be respected [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>Each of the authors contributed to the writing and editing of this manuscript.</p><p>Dr. Sehgal is the section editor for the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Education and Training Section. Drs. Nunez and Ferreira have nothing to disclose.</p><p>NA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"993-994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19343\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

M女士是一位80岁的完全依赖他人的西班牙语妇女,患有严重的阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症,被老年医学视为住院患者,以进行护理讨论。她因感染性休克(MRSA菌血症)和可能的心内膜炎入院,需要在重症监护病房(ICU)长期住院。她开始服用降压药和广谱抗生素,并接受了侵入性手术。由于住院时间延长,患者临床状况明显恶化,包括严重的吞咽困难。最终,她从重症监护室转到普通医务室;然而,她的严重虚弱和吞咽困难仍然没有改变,PEG管置入和其他侵入性手术由跨专业的入院团队提出。她的女儿是她的医疗代理(HCS),她要求“一切都要做”,包括保持完全编码状态、经食管回声确认心内膜炎、植入PEG,并拒绝接受姑息治疗咨询。然后咨询老年医学,讨论护理目标。在我们的咨询中,我们观察到M女士是一个虚弱的人,患有严重的痴呆症,她的语言局限于“是”和“否”的回答。我们打电话给她的女儿,问她是否可以和我们以及她的母亲当面谈谈她对母亲健康的担忧和期望。在与M夫人的女儿进行了长时间的讨论后,我们发现她最大的恐惧之一是她的母亲由于吞咽困难而无法滋养自己,因此身体越来越虚弱。这就是她想要放置PEG管的原因。我们花时间向她解释生命结束时小快乐的重要性,以及在她母亲疾病的这个阶段,PEG管弊大于利。我们问她最喜欢的食物是什么,她女儿回答说“炸薯条”(papas fritas);见图1:帕帕斯弗里塔或炸薯条的图像。我们推荐了一种自由的饮食,在接下来的几天里,她的女儿开始给她少量的薯条,这是她能忍受的。在那之后,她的女儿要求将代码状态更改为DNR,拒绝放置PEG管,并接受了母亲的临终关怀咨询。M的故事提醒我们,护理讨论的目标是多么重要,即确定对患者最重要的是什么,并确保我们的工作始终尊重他们的愿望,尤其是在生命的最后阶段。它还提醒我们,在痴呆症诊断的背景下,尽早进行这些对话是多么重要,而不是等到疾病已经发展到无法确定生命末期的优先事项时。很多时候,由于时间限制,道德障碍,或由于患者或家属的感知阻力,护理讨论的目标被避免了。在实践中,我们确实看到病人拒绝谈论这个问题,根据他们个人的文化和信仰,这种类型的谈话有时是不受欢迎的。在M夫人的案例中,她的女儿最初拒绝这些谈话,因为她认为放置PEG管会对她的母亲有益。然而,一旦我们能够确定喂食管与她母亲最关心的事情不一致,并且能够解决女儿的担忧和期望,她就明白了最重要的事情是为她的母亲提供安慰。在诊断早期与痴呆症患者进行护理讨论的目标总是很重要的,最好是患者和他们的护理人员都在场,在一个平静、无压力的环境中,这样可以有时间提供信息,纠正有关护理的误解,并确保当时间到来时,对患者最重要的事情将得到尊重[2,3]。每位作者都对这份手稿的撰写和编辑做出了贡献。Sehgal是《美国老年医学会杂志》教育和培训部的编辑。Drs。努涅斯和费雷拉没什么可透露的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Food for Thought: Papas Fritas

Food for Thought: Papas Fritas

Mrs. M is an 80-year-old fully dependent, Spanish-speaking woman with severe Alzheimer's dementia seen as an inpatient by Geriatric Medicine for a goals of care discussion.

She was admitted due to septic shock (MRSA bacteremia) and possible endocarditis, requiring a prolonged admission in the intensive care unit (ICU). She was started on pressors and broad-spectrum antibiotics and underwent invasive procedures. Due to her prolonged ICU stay, her clinical status significantly deteriorated, including severe dysphagia. Eventually, she was transferred from the ICU to the general medical floor; however, her severe frailty and dysphagia remained unchanged, and PEG tube placement and other invasive procedures were brought up by the interprofessional admitting team.

Her daughter, who was her health care surrogate (HCS), requested ‘everything to be done,’ including maintaining full code status, a transesophageal echo to confirm endocarditis, and PEG placement, and refused consultation from palliative care. Geriatric medicine was then consulted for a goals of care discussion.

During our consultation, we observed Mrs. M to be a frail person living with severe dementia, whose speech was limited to yes and no answers. We called her daughter and asked if she could join us and her mother in person to identify her concerns and expectations regarding her mother's health.

After a long discussion with Mrs. M's daughter, we identified that one of her biggest fears was that her mother was not able to nourish herself due to dysphagia and, as a result, was getting weaker. This was her reason for wanting a PEG tube to be placed. We took the time to explain the importance of small pleasures at the end of life and that the PEG tube would provide more harm than good at this stage of her mother's illness. We asked what her favorite food was, and her daughter answered ‘papas fritas’ (French fries); see Figure 1: image of Papas Fritas or French Fries. We recommended a liberalized diet, and in the following days her daughter started to give her small amounts of french fries as tolerated. After that, her daughter requested a change of code status to DNR, declined PEG tube placement, and accepted a hospice consultation for her mother.

Mrs. M's story reminds us how important goals of care discussions are to identify what matters most to our patients and to make sure we work to always honor their wishes, but especially at the end of life. It also reminds us how crucial it is, even more in a setting of the diagnosis of dementia, to have those conversations early rather than when the disease is already too advanced for them to be able to determine their priorities at the end of life.

Many times, goals of care discussions are avoided due to time restraints, moral barriers, or due to perceived resistance from patients or families. In practice, we do see resistance from patients to talk about this matter, and depending on their individual culture and beliefs, this type of conversation is, at times, not welcomed.

In Mrs. M's case, her daughter initially resisted these conversations as she believed that having a PEG tube placed would be beneficial for her mother. However, once we were able to identify that a feeding tube was not in alignment with What mattered most to her mother, and being able to address the daughter's concerns and expectations, she understood that the most important thing was to provide her mother with comfort.

It is always important to have goals of care discussions with patients with dementia early in their diagnosis, ideally with both the patient and their caregivers present in a calm, non-stressed environment, which allows time to provide information and correct misconceptions regarding care and assures that when the time comes, what matters most to the patient will be respected [2, 3].

Each of the authors contributed to the writing and editing of this manuscript.

Dr. Sehgal is the section editor for the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Education and Training Section. Drs. Nunez and Ferreira have nothing to disclose.

NA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信