{"title":"炎症性肠病肠超声治疗反应和缓解定义的系统综述。","authors":"Mariangela Allocca, Ferdinando D'Amico, Gionata Fiorino, Vipul Jairath, Torsten Kucharzik, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is emerging as a valuable tool to assess treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical trials. This study details how IUS defines response and remission to evaluate treatment efficacy in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of studies from 1984 to March 31, 2024, focusing on IUS use in assessing treatment efficacy in IBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 studies were included: 31 on Crohn's disease (CD), 12 on ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8 on IBD. Ileocolonoscopy was used as a reference standard in 53% of studies. IUS-defined response was reported in 47% of studies, with the majority (71%) using changes in bowel wall thickness (BWT) and color Doppler signals (CDS) as key indicators. IUS-defined remission was reported in 53% of studies, primarily using normalization of BWT to <3 mm and CDS to grades 0 or 1 as criteria. Ultrasonographic activity scores were used in 16% of studies, including the Bowel Ultrasound Score (BUSS) in two CD studies, the International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) in one CD study, and the Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) in one UC study The remaining four studies used unvalidated scores without clear definitions of response or remission. Assessment times varied, most commonly at weeks 8-16, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review reveals significant variability in IUS definitions of response and remission in IBD, highlighting the need to standardize eligibility criteria and outcome measures for IUS in IBD clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review on definitions of intestinal ultrasound treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Mariangela Allocca, Ferdinando D'Amico, Gionata Fiorino, Vipul Jairath, Torsten Kucharzik, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is emerging as a valuable tool to assess treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical trials. This study details how IUS defines response and remission to evaluate treatment efficacy in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of studies from 1984 to March 31, 2024, focusing on IUS use in assessing treatment efficacy in IBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 studies were included: 31 on Crohn's disease (CD), 12 on ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8 on IBD. Ileocolonoscopy was used as a reference standard in 53% of studies. IUS-defined response was reported in 47% of studies, with the majority (71%) using changes in bowel wall thickness (BWT) and color Doppler signals (CDS) as key indicators. IUS-defined remission was reported in 53% of studies, primarily using normalization of BWT to <3 mm and CDS to grades 0 or 1 as criteria. Ultrasonographic activity scores were used in 16% of studies, including the Bowel Ultrasound Score (BUSS) in two CD studies, the International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) in one CD study, and the Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) in one UC study The remaining four studies used unvalidated scores without clear definitions of response or remission. Assessment times varied, most commonly at weeks 8-16, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review reveals significant variability in IUS definitions of response and remission in IBD, highlighting the need to standardize eligibility criteria and outcome measures for IUS in IBD clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic review on definitions of intestinal ultrasound treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease.
Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is emerging as a valuable tool to assess treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical trials. This study details how IUS defines response and remission to evaluate treatment efficacy in IBD patients.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of studies from 1984 to March 31, 2024, focusing on IUS use in assessing treatment efficacy in IBD.
Results: A total of 51 studies were included: 31 on Crohn's disease (CD), 12 on ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8 on IBD. Ileocolonoscopy was used as a reference standard in 53% of studies. IUS-defined response was reported in 47% of studies, with the majority (71%) using changes in bowel wall thickness (BWT) and color Doppler signals (CDS) as key indicators. IUS-defined remission was reported in 53% of studies, primarily using normalization of BWT to <3 mm and CDS to grades 0 or 1 as criteria. Ultrasonographic activity scores were used in 16% of studies, including the Bowel Ultrasound Score (BUSS) in two CD studies, the International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) in one CD study, and the Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) in one UC study The remaining four studies used unvalidated scores without clear definitions of response or remission. Assessment times varied, most commonly at weeks 8-16, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Conclusions: This systematic review reveals significant variability in IUS definitions of response and remission in IBD, highlighting the need to standardize eligibility criteria and outcome measures for IUS in IBD clinical trials.