高、中、高风险肺栓塞管理:5年重症监护病房的随机回顾。

Inês Mendonça, Sara Teixeira, Ana Rita Ferreira, José Artur Paiva
{"title":"高、中、高风险肺栓塞管理:5年重症监护病房的随机回顾。","authors":"Inês Mendonça, Sara Teixeira, Ana Rita Ferreira, José Artur Paiva","doi":"10.48729/pjctvs.415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal management of high-risk and intermediate-high-risk Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a matter of ongoing debate. This paper aims to assess the short and long-term clinical outcomes associated with different treatment approaches for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and identify potential areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to an ICU with high and intermediate-high-risk PE between January 2018 and December 2023. The therapeutic approach and clinical outcomes were evaluated: ICU and 28-days survival, ICU and hospital length of stay, major hemorrhagic complications and direct and indirect signs of pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Demographic, comorbid state and severity at admission data were also collected (sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity and APACHE II scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>64 patients were included: 32 high-risk PE (including 18 in cardiac arrest) [Groups 1-5] and 32 intermediate-high-risk PE [Group 6a-c]. Treatment approaches varied: Group 1 - High-risk PE treated with systemic thrombolysis (ST) (n=18); Group 2 - High-risk PE treated with Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) plus ST (n=6); Group 3 - High-risk PE treated with VA-ECMO alone (n=5); Group 4 - High-risk PE treated with catheter-direct-therapy (n=1); Group 5 - Heparin only (n=2). Group 1 demonstrated an ICU and 28-day survival of 83.0%, while Groups 2 and 3 exhibited survival rates of 66.67% and 60.0%, respectively. There were 10 major bleeding complications in Group 1 and 2. For intermediate-high-risk PE, heparin alone was used in 90%; ICU and 28-day survival rate was 97%. Three patients exhibited signs of PHT during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper provides insights for the decision-making process involved in managing high and intermedi- ate-high-risk PE drawing from a 5-year retrospective cohort study conducted at an ECMO center and literature review. Fur- ther research is needed to identify the specific subgroup within the intermediate-high-risk PE that would benefit from more advanced treatment modalities for both short and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74480,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","volume":"31 3","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High And Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism Management: A 5-Year Intensive Care Unit Casuistic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Inês Mendonça, Sara Teixeira, Ana Rita Ferreira, José Artur Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.48729/pjctvs.415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal management of high-risk and intermediate-high-risk Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a matter of ongoing debate. This paper aims to assess the short and long-term clinical outcomes associated with different treatment approaches for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and identify potential areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to an ICU with high and intermediate-high-risk PE between January 2018 and December 2023. The therapeutic approach and clinical outcomes were evaluated: ICU and 28-days survival, ICU and hospital length of stay, major hemorrhagic complications and direct and indirect signs of pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Demographic, comorbid state and severity at admission data were also collected (sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity and APACHE II scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>64 patients were included: 32 high-risk PE (including 18 in cardiac arrest) [Groups 1-5] and 32 intermediate-high-risk PE [Group 6a-c]. Treatment approaches varied: Group 1 - High-risk PE treated with systemic thrombolysis (ST) (n=18); Group 2 - High-risk PE treated with Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) plus ST (n=6); Group 3 - High-risk PE treated with VA-ECMO alone (n=5); Group 4 - High-risk PE treated with catheter-direct-therapy (n=1); Group 5 - Heparin only (n=2). Group 1 demonstrated an ICU and 28-day survival of 83.0%, while Groups 2 and 3 exhibited survival rates of 66.67% and 60.0%, respectively. There were 10 major bleeding complications in Group 1 and 2. For intermediate-high-risk PE, heparin alone was used in 90%; ICU and 28-day survival rate was 97%. Three patients exhibited signs of PHT during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper provides insights for the decision-making process involved in managing high and intermedi- ate-high-risk PE drawing from a 5-year retrospective cohort study conducted at an ECMO center and literature review. Fur- ther research is needed to identify the specific subgroup within the intermediate-high-risk PE that would benefit from more advanced treatment modalities for both short and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"21-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:高危和中高危肺栓塞(PE)的最佳治疗是一个持续争论的问题。本文旨在评估重症监护室(ICU)高风险和中高风险PE不同治疗方法的短期和长期临床结果,并确定潜在的改进领域。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年12月ICU收治的高、中高危PE患者。评估治疗方法和临床结果:ICU和28天生存率、ICU和住院时间、主要出血性并发症和肺动脉高压(PHT)的直接和间接体征。还收集了入院时的人口统计学、共病状态和严重程度数据(性别、年龄、Charlson共病和APACHE II评分)。结果:纳入64例患者:高危PE 32例(其中心脏骤停18例)[1-5组],中高危PE 32例[6a-c组]。治疗方法多种多样:1组-采用全身溶栓(ST)治疗高危PE (n=18);2组:静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO) + ST治疗高危PE (n=6);第3组:单纯VA-ECMO治疗的高危PE (n=5);4组-导管直接治疗的高危PE (n=1);第5组:仅使用肝素(n=2)。第1组ICU和28天生存率为83.0%,第2组和第3组生存率分别为66.67%和60.0%。1、2组主要出血并发症10例。对于中高危PE, 90%的患者单独使用肝素;ICU和28天生存率为97%。3例患者在随访中表现出PHT症状。结论:本文从ECMO中心进行的5年回顾性队列研究和文献综述中,为管理高、中高风险PE的决策过程提供了见解。需要进一步的研究来确定中高风险PE的特定亚组,这些亚组将从更先进的短期和长期治疗方式中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High And Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism Management: A 5-Year Intensive Care Unit Casuistic Review.

Background and objectives: The optimal management of high-risk and intermediate-high-risk Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a matter of ongoing debate. This paper aims to assess the short and long-term clinical outcomes associated with different treatment approaches for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and identify potential areas for improvement.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to an ICU with high and intermediate-high-risk PE between January 2018 and December 2023. The therapeutic approach and clinical outcomes were evaluated: ICU and 28-days survival, ICU and hospital length of stay, major hemorrhagic complications and direct and indirect signs of pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Demographic, comorbid state and severity at admission data were also collected (sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity and APACHE II scores).

Results: 64 patients were included: 32 high-risk PE (including 18 in cardiac arrest) [Groups 1-5] and 32 intermediate-high-risk PE [Group 6a-c]. Treatment approaches varied: Group 1 - High-risk PE treated with systemic thrombolysis (ST) (n=18); Group 2 - High-risk PE treated with Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) plus ST (n=6); Group 3 - High-risk PE treated with VA-ECMO alone (n=5); Group 4 - High-risk PE treated with catheter-direct-therapy (n=1); Group 5 - Heparin only (n=2). Group 1 demonstrated an ICU and 28-day survival of 83.0%, while Groups 2 and 3 exhibited survival rates of 66.67% and 60.0%, respectively. There were 10 major bleeding complications in Group 1 and 2. For intermediate-high-risk PE, heparin alone was used in 90%; ICU and 28-day survival rate was 97%. Three patients exhibited signs of PHT during follow-up.

Conclusion: This paper provides insights for the decision-making process involved in managing high and intermedi- ate-high-risk PE drawing from a 5-year retrospective cohort study conducted at an ECMO center and literature review. Fur- ther research is needed to identify the specific subgroup within the intermediate-high-risk PE that would benefit from more advanced treatment modalities for both short and long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信