膀胱过度活动综合征先进治疗后的治疗交叉。

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Preston Edge, Lisa R Yanek, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen, Victoria L Handa
{"title":"膀胱过度活动综合征先进治疗后的治疗交叉。","authors":"Preston Edge, Lisa R Yanek, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen, Victoria L Handa","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients deciding between advanced therapies for overactive bladder syndrome may be interested to know the likelihood of treatment crossover after sacral neuromodulation, intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA, or percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Treatment crossover was defined as a switch from one advanced therapy to another.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of treatment crossover after each advanced therapy for nonneurogenic overactive bladder syndrome. Our secondary objective was to compare medication use after each advanced therapy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using claims data from the MarketScan database, privately insured women 18-65 years old with overactive bladder syndrome were identified for this retrospective cohort study. For all patients who received an advanced therapy between 2013 and 2019, we calculated the proportion who subsequently crossed over to a different advanced treatment. For each advanced therapy, we also calculated the proportion who subsequently utilized overactive bladder medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7,231 adult women who underwent index advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome between 2013 and 2019. Treatment crossover occurred in 309 women (4.3%) and was significantly more likely following percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (8.0%) compared to sacral neuromodulation (4.2%) or intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (2.6%, P < 0.01). Treatment crossover was also more likely following sacral neuromodulation compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (P < 0.01). Medication use after advanced therapy was more common after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (29.2%) compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (20.4%) or sacral neuromodulation (18.8%, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment crossover following advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome was uncommon but was significantly more likely after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Medication use following advanced treatment occurred in a substantial minority in all cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 2","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Preston Edge, Lisa R Yanek, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen, Victoria L Handa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients deciding between advanced therapies for overactive bladder syndrome may be interested to know the likelihood of treatment crossover after sacral neuromodulation, intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA, or percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Treatment crossover was defined as a switch from one advanced therapy to another.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of treatment crossover after each advanced therapy for nonneurogenic overactive bladder syndrome. Our secondary objective was to compare medication use after each advanced therapy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using claims data from the MarketScan database, privately insured women 18-65 years old with overactive bladder syndrome were identified for this retrospective cohort study. For all patients who received an advanced therapy between 2013 and 2019, we calculated the proportion who subsequently crossed over to a different advanced treatment. For each advanced therapy, we also calculated the proportion who subsequently utilized overactive bladder medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7,231 adult women who underwent index advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome between 2013 and 2019. Treatment crossover occurred in 309 women (4.3%) and was significantly more likely following percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (8.0%) compared to sacral neuromodulation (4.2%) or intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (2.6%, P < 0.01). Treatment crossover was also more likely following sacral neuromodulation compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (P < 0.01). Medication use after advanced therapy was more common after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (29.2%) compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (20.4%) or sacral neuromodulation (18.8%, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment crossover following advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome was uncommon but was significantly more likely after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Medication use following advanced treatment occurred in a substantial minority in all cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"108-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:决定采用何种先进疗法治疗膀胱过度活动综合征的患者可能有兴趣了解骶神经调节、肌内肉毒杆菌毒素或经皮胫神经刺激后治疗交叉的可能性。治疗交叉被定义为从一种先进疗法切换到另一种。目的:本研究的目的是估计非神经源性膀胱过度活动综合征每次高级治疗后的治疗交叉率。我们的次要目的是比较每次高级治疗后的药物使用情况。研究设计:使用来自MarketScan数据库的索赔数据,在这项回顾性队列研究中确定了18-65岁患有膀胱过度活动综合征的私人保险女性。对于2013年至2019年期间接受高级治疗的所有患者,我们计算了随后转入不同高级治疗的比例。对于每一种高级治疗,我们也计算了随后使用过度膀胱药物的比例。结果:我们确定了7,231名成年女性,她们在2013年至2019年期间接受了膀胱过度活动综合征的指数高级治疗。309名妇女(4.3%)发生治疗交叉,经皮胫神经刺激(8.0%)比骶神经调节(4.2%)或肌内肉毒杆菌毒素(2.6%,P < 0.01)更可能发生治疗交叉。与肌内肉毒杆菌毒素相比,骶骨神经调节后治疗交叉的可能性更大(P < 0.01)。经皮胫神经刺激(29.2%)较肌内肉毒杆菌毒素(20.4%)或骶骨神经调节(18.8%,P < 0.01)更常见。结论:膀胱过度活动综合征的高级治疗后交叉治疗并不常见,但经皮胫神经刺激后交叉治疗的可能性更大。在所有队列中,在晚期治疗后使用药物的患者占少数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.

Importance: Patients deciding between advanced therapies for overactive bladder syndrome may be interested to know the likelihood of treatment crossover after sacral neuromodulation, intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA, or percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Treatment crossover was defined as a switch from one advanced therapy to another.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of treatment crossover after each advanced therapy for nonneurogenic overactive bladder syndrome. Our secondary objective was to compare medication use after each advanced therapy.

Study design: Using claims data from the MarketScan database, privately insured women 18-65 years old with overactive bladder syndrome were identified for this retrospective cohort study. For all patients who received an advanced therapy between 2013 and 2019, we calculated the proportion who subsequently crossed over to a different advanced treatment. For each advanced therapy, we also calculated the proportion who subsequently utilized overactive bladder medication.

Results: We identified 7,231 adult women who underwent index advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome between 2013 and 2019. Treatment crossover occurred in 309 women (4.3%) and was significantly more likely following percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (8.0%) compared to sacral neuromodulation (4.2%) or intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (2.6%, P < 0.01). Treatment crossover was also more likely following sacral neuromodulation compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (P < 0.01). Medication use after advanced therapy was more common after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (29.2%) compared to intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (20.4%) or sacral neuromodulation (18.8%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Treatment crossover following advanced therapy for overactive bladder syndrome was uncommon but was significantly more likely after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Medication use following advanced treatment occurred in a substantial minority in all cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信