Cindy Yuan MD, PhD , Hongxian Huang MA , Douglas Dirschl MD , Pradeep Chintagunta PhD , David Paushter MD
{"title":"选择性影像学利用的主要驱动因素的特征和目标:一项应用联合分析的横断面研究。","authors":"Cindy Yuan MD, PhD , Hongxian Huang MA , Douglas Dirschl MD , Pradeep Chintagunta PhD , David Paushter MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize patient and referring physician preferences when selecting where to have elective imaging performed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this institutional research board–approved survey-based study, online surveys were completed by 393 patients who had recently had a noncontrast MRI of the shoulder, lumbar spine, or knee within the past 2 years and 168 physicians who had ordered at least 12 such MRIs in the past year. The survey data included explicit questions about preferences as well as a set of conjoint choice screens. Conjoint analysis used a logistic model estimated using maximum likelihood estimation. Additionally, latent class analysis was performed to evaluate segmentation of the market.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both patients and referring physicians placed most value on copay and cost, with both groups containing a large segment that places almost all value on low costs. Patients also valued the recommendation of their referring physician and convenient appointment time and location. Overall, physicians also valued image quality and a trusted radiologist, with one physician segment placing more value on these traits than cost. As expected, there was some variation between the relative importance of traits depending on whether respondents were ranking, rating, or implicitly valuing characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Overall, both patients and referring physicians place greatest importance on copay and cost but other nonmonetary characteristics have significant utility values, which could be leveraged to help radiology practices offer better services for their patients and referring physicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages 521-529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization and Targeting of the Main Drivers of Elective Imaging Utilization: A Cross-Sectional Study Applying Conjoint Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Yuan MD, PhD , Hongxian Huang MA , Douglas Dirschl MD , Pradeep Chintagunta PhD , David Paushter MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.01.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize patient and referring physician preferences when selecting where to have elective imaging performed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this institutional research board–approved survey-based study, online surveys were completed by 393 patients who had recently had a noncontrast MRI of the shoulder, lumbar spine, or knee within the past 2 years and 168 physicians who had ordered at least 12 such MRIs in the past year. The survey data included explicit questions about preferences as well as a set of conjoint choice screens. Conjoint analysis used a logistic model estimated using maximum likelihood estimation. Additionally, latent class analysis was performed to evaluate segmentation of the market.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both patients and referring physicians placed most value on copay and cost, with both groups containing a large segment that places almost all value on low costs. Patients also valued the recommendation of their referring physician and convenient appointment time and location. Overall, physicians also valued image quality and a trusted radiologist, with one physician segment placing more value on these traits than cost. As expected, there was some variation between the relative importance of traits depending on whether respondents were ranking, rating, or implicitly valuing characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Overall, both patients and referring physicians place greatest importance on copay and cost but other nonmonetary characteristics have significant utility values, which could be leveraged to help radiology practices offer better services for their patients and referring physicians.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 521-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025000444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characterization and Targeting of the Main Drivers of Elective Imaging Utilization: A Cross-Sectional Study Applying Conjoint Analysis
Objective
To characterize patient and referring physician preferences when selecting where to have elective imaging performed.
Methods
In this institutional research board–approved survey-based study, online surveys were completed by 393 patients who had recently had a noncontrast MRI of the shoulder, lumbar spine, or knee within the past 2 years and 168 physicians who had ordered at least 12 such MRIs in the past year. The survey data included explicit questions about preferences as well as a set of conjoint choice screens. Conjoint analysis used a logistic model estimated using maximum likelihood estimation. Additionally, latent class analysis was performed to evaluate segmentation of the market.
Results
Both patients and referring physicians placed most value on copay and cost, with both groups containing a large segment that places almost all value on low costs. Patients also valued the recommendation of their referring physician and convenient appointment time and location. Overall, physicians also valued image quality and a trusted radiologist, with one physician segment placing more value on these traits than cost. As expected, there was some variation between the relative importance of traits depending on whether respondents were ranking, rating, or implicitly valuing characteristics.
Discussion
Overall, both patients and referring physicians place greatest importance on copay and cost but other nonmonetary characteristics have significant utility values, which could be leveraged to help radiology practices offer better services for their patients and referring physicians.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.